Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/740,671

USER DEVICE METHOD FOR WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TABLE GAME SCOREBOARD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 12, 2024
Priority
May 27, 2016 — divisional of 10/828,552 +2 more
Examiner
VANDERVEEN, JEFFREY S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Medal Sports (Taiwan) Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
476 granted / 739 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
769
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 1 includes limitations directed towards 1. A method comprising: and establishing, using a user device, a communication link to a data transmission module of an electronic scoring system; and receiving, at the user device from the data transmission module, a first score of the game, a second score of the game, and a first recorded video of the game, wherein the first recorded video includes a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system; and. Le teaches transmitting, from the user device to the data transmission module, at least one game parameter for a game to be played using the electronic scoring system; See [0013+], receiving, at the user device from the data transmission module, updates to the graphical overlay, wherein the updates are generated by the electronic scoring system in response to changes to at least one of the first score of the game or the second score of the game. See Fig. 3B. Davisson teaches transmitting, from the user device to the data transmission module, an overlay video request; See [0050+]. The closest art of record Le teaches the video overlay and transmission module; however it is silent with regards to the electronic scoring system game parameters for a game to be played, and the first recorded video with a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system. The prior art of record, alone or in combination, does not teach or suggest the above-identified limitations, and claim 1 is therefore allowed. Claim 11 includes limitations directed towards 11. A user device configured to communicate with an electronic scoring system, the user device comprising: a processor; and a memory configured to store instructions that, when executed by the processor, execute an application configured to: and establish a communication link to a data transmission module of an electronic scoring system; and transmit, to the data transmission module, at least one game parameter for a game to be played using the electronic scoring system; and receive, from the data transmission module, a first score of the game, a second score of the game, and a first recorded video of the game, wherein the first recorded video includes a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system; and. Davisson teaches transmit, to the data transmission module, an overlay video request; See [0050+]. Le teaches receive, from the data transmission module, updates to the graphical overlay, wherein the updates are generated by the electronic scoring system in response to changes to at least one of the first score of the game or the second score of the game. See Fig. 3B. The closest art of record Le teaches the video overlay and transmission module, however it is silent with regards to the memory and processor configured to establish the communication link transmit the at least one game parameter for a game to be played using the electronic scoring system and the receiving from the transmission module a first and second score of the game and the first recorded video wherein the first recorded video includes a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system. The prior art of record, alone or in combination, does not teach or suggest the above-identified limitations, and claim 11 is therefore allowed. Claim 20 includes limitations directed towards 20. A system comprising: a user device configured to communicate with an electronic scoring system, wherein the user device includes a display configured to display one or more selectable icons, and wherein the user device is configured to: and execute an application configured to establish a communication link to a data transmission module of an electronic scoring system; and transmit, to the data transmission module and using the application, at least one game parameter for a game to be played using the electronic scoring system; and receive, via the application and from the data transmission module, a first score of the game, a second score of the game, and a first recorded video of the game, wherein the first recorded video includes a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system; and. Davisson teaches transmit, to the data transmission module and using the application, an overlay video request; See [0050+]. Le teaches receive, via the application and from the data transmission module, updates to the graphical overlay, wherein the updates are generated by the electronic scoring system in response to changes to at least one of the first score of the game or the second score of the game. See Fig. 3B. The closest art of record Le teaches the video overlay however it is silent with regards to the user device with selectable icons the execution of the application to establish a communication link with the electronic scoring system the transmission of one game parameter for a game to be played using the electronic scoring system and the first recorded video includes a graphical overlay generated by the electronic scoring system. The prior art of record, alone or in combination, does not teach or suggest the above-identified limitations, and claim 20 is therefore allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 recites the limitation "an electronic scoring system" in "11. A user device configured to communicate with an electronic scoring system." Specifically, "electronic scoring system" was previously introduced in a parent claim, so it is unclear whether "an electronic scoring system" refers to that previously introduced element or introduces a new, separate element. Accordingly, the claim is rendered indefinite. Claim 12 recites the limitation "an application" in "an application configured to enable a user to select the at least one game parameter from a plurality of game parameters." Specifically, "application" was previously introduced in a parent claim, so it is unclear whether "an application" refers to that previously introduced element or introduces a new, separate element. Accordingly, the claim is rendered indefinite. Claim 20 recites the limitation "an electronic scoring system" in "20. A system comprising: a user device configured to communicate with an electronic scoring system." Specifically, "electronic scoring system" was previously introduced in a parent claim, so it is unclear whether "an electronic scoring system" refers to that previously introduced element or introduces a new, separate element. Accordingly, the claim is rendered indefinite. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Le US 20070273488 A1 - which teaches a video overlay system for sporting events. Davisson US 20150382076 A1 - which teaches a video overlay system for basketball with transmission capabilities. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY S VANDERVEEN whose telephone number is (571)270-0503. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 11am - 7pm CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Weiss can be reached at (571) 270-1775. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY S VANDERVEEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734412
GOLF CLUB ALTERNATIVE FITTING SYSTEM
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722056
LAMINATED PICKLE BALL PADDLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717310
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING PERFORMANCE VARIABLE VALUES OF A GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714926
Golf Putting Apparatus and Board Game
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702907
Shock Absorbing Structure of Racket
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month