Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/741,088

Thrust Reverser Mounting Assembly

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 12, 2024
Examiner
HARRINGTON, ALYSON JOAN
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
137 granted / 180 resolved
+6.1% vs TC avg
Strong +62% interview lift
Without
With
+61.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 180 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are currently being examined. Claim Objections Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 8: in each of lines 7 and 9, “to connected” should read as – to connect --. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-11, 13-16 and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Buxton 4585189. Regarding independent claim 1, Buxton teaches a mounting assembly (Fig. 3) to support a thrust reverser (col 3 lines 32-34 describe thrust reversers incorporated into first and second cowling sections 18 and 19 which are shown in Fig. 3 and shown in open position as 18’, 19’ in Fig. 3A) that is mounted to an engine mount (pylon 16, i.e., an engine mount, in Fig. 3; engine 12 is shown mounted to engine mount 16 via the mounting assembly in Fig. 3 which is described in col 3 lines 10-16) of an aircraft (10 in Figs. 1-2; col 3 lines 12-13 describe 10 is an aircraft with fuselage 15), the mounting assembly comprising: a support assembly (40, 54A, 54B, 42, 44A, 44B, 48A, 48B in Fig. 3A) configured to connect to the engine mount of the aircraft (40 is configured to connect to 16 as shown in Fig. 3), the support assembly comprising a first lateral side (first lateral side at 60A,60B in Fig. 3A) and a second lateral side (second lateral side at 64A,64B in Fig. 3A); a first arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) connected to the first lateral side of the support assembly (first arm is connected to first lateral side at 60, 60B) and configured to connect to a first section of the thrust reverser (first arm is configured to connect to 18’ in Fig. 3A); a second arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) connected to the second lateral side of the support assembly (second arm is connected to second lateral side at 64A,64B in Fig. 3A) and configured to connect to a second section of the thrust reverser (second arm is configured to connect to 19’ in Fig. 3A); and wherein the first arm and the second arm are pivotally connected to the support assembly to support the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser at different angular positions (as shown in Fig. 3 and in Fig. 3A, the first arm and second arm are pivotally connected to the support assembly at pivot axis point 62 and at pivot axis point 66 per col 4 lines 3-8; Fig. 3 shows 18 and 19 at one angular position which is partially open and Figs. 2 and 3A show 18’ and 19’ at another angular position which is fully open). PNG media_image1.png 747 701 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Buxton further teaches the support assembly comprising a first base assembly (44A Fig. 4) and a second base assembly (48A Fig. 4) that are mounted adjacent to each other (44A and 48A are mounted adjacent each other) and with inner sides abutting together (inner side of 44A at first end 45A of 44A abuts inner side of 48A at first end 50A of 48A in Fig. 4) and with the first arm connected to the first base assembly (first arm is connected to 44A in Figs. 3A and 4) and the second arm connected to the second base assembly (second arm is connected to 48A in Figs. 3A and 4). Regarding claim 3, Buxton further teaches the first base assembly and the second base assembly are aligned in a common plane (44A and 48A are aligned in plane of Fig. 3A). Regarding claim 6, Buxton further teaches the support assembly, the first arm, and the second arm are aligned in a common plane (in the plane of the section shown in Fig. 4 which is taken through line 4-4 in Fig. 1, the first arm, second arm and 44A, 44B, 48A, 48B of support assembly are aligned). Regarding claim 7, Buxton further teaches the first arm pivots about a first pivot axis (axis through pivot axis point 62 in Fig. 4; first arm pivots about axis through 62) and the second arm pivots about a second pivot axis (axis through pivot axis point 66 in Fig. 4; second arm pivots about axis through 66) wherein the first pivot axis and the second pivot axis are spaced apart and parallel (axis through 62 and axis through 66 in Fig. 4 are spaced apart and parallel). PNG media_image2.png 747 701 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding independent claim 8, Buxton teaches a mounting assembly (Fig. 3) to support a thrust reverser (col 3 lines 32-34 describe thrust reversers incorporated into first and second cowling sections 18 and 19 which are shown in Fig. 3 and shown in open position as 18’, 19’ in Fig. 3A) that is mounted to an engine mount (pylon 16, i.e., an engine mount, in Fig. 3; engine 12 is shown mounted to engine mount 16 via the mounting assembly in Fig. 3 which is described in col 3 lines 10-16) of an aircraft (10 in Figs. 1-2; col 3 lines 12-13 describe 10 is an aircraft with fuselage 15), the mounting assembly comprising: a beam assembly (16, 40, 54A, 54B, 42 in Fig. 3A) configured to connect to the engine mount (40 of beam assembly is configured to connect to 16 as shown in Fig. 3); a first base assembly (44A, 44B in Fig. 3A) and a second base assembly (48A, 48B in Fig. 3A) each connected to the beam assembly (44A, 44B and 48A, 48B are each connected to 42 of beam assembly in Fig. 3A), the first base assembly and the second base assembly aligned in a common plane (44A, 44B and 48A, 48B are aligned in plane of the section shown in Fig. 4 which is taken through line 4-4 in Fig. 1); a first arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) pivotally connected to the first base assembly (as shown in Fig. 3 and in Fig. 3A, the first arm is pivotally connected to 44A, 44B at pivot axis point 62 per col 4 lines 3-8) and comprising a first mount (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) configured to connected to a first section (18, 18’) of the thrust reverser (as shown in Fig. 3A, first mount is configured to connect to 18’); a second arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) pivotally connected to the second base assembly (as shown in Fig. 3 and in Fig. 3A, the second arm is pivotally connected to 48A, 48B at pivot axis point 66 per col 4 lines 3-8) and comprising a second mount (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) configured to connected to a second section (19, 19’) of the thrust reverser (as shown in Fig. 3A, second mount is configured to connect to 19’); and wherein the first arm and the second arm pivot between first and second positions to selectively position the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser at different angular positions (as shown in Figs. 2-3A, first arm and the second arm pivot between first and second positions which positions 18 and 19 of the thrust reverser in different angular positions; Fig. 3 shows 18 and 19 at one angular position which is partially open and Figs. 2 and 3A show 18’ and 19’ at another angular position which is fully open). Regarding claim 9, Buxton further teaches each of the first base assembly and the second base assembly comprises inner edges that abut together (inner edge of 44A at first end 45A of 44A abuts inner edge of 48A at first end 50A of 48A in Fig. 4; edge interpreted per Vocabulary.com dictionary definition: the outside limit of an object or area or surface; a place farthest away from the center) and outer edges that face outward in opposing lateral directions (outer edge of 44A at 60A and outer edge of 48A at 64A face outward in opposing lateral directions in Fig. 3A) with the first arm connected at the outer edge of the first base assembly (first arm is connected at outer edge of 44A at 60A in Fig. 3A) and the second arm is connected at the outer edge of the second base assembly (second arm is connected at outer edge of 48A at 64A in Fig. 3A). Regarding claim 10, Buxton further teaches the beam assembly comprises: a beam (16 is a beam as shown in Fig. 3A); and clevis joints (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) that extend outward from the beam (the clevis joints extend outward from 16 in Fig. 3A) and are configured to connect to the first base assembly and the second base assembly (one of the clevis joints is configured to connect to 44A, 44B via the first mount and the first arm, and the other clevis joint is configured to connect to the 48A, 48B via the second mount and the second arm in annotated Fig. 3A). PNG media_image3.png 747 701 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 11, Buxton further teaches the beam assembly, the first base assembly, the second base assembly, the first arm, and the second arm are aligned in a common plane (end 46 of 42, 54A, 54B, 44A, 44B, 48A, 48B, first arm and second arm are aligned in plane of the section shown in Fig. 4 which is taken through line 4-4 in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 13, Buxton further teaches a first block positioned between the first base assembly and the first arm (a first pin or fastener, i.e., a first block, extending through and between the first arm and 44A, 44B at 60A, 60B about which the first arm and 44A, 44B pivot) to support the first arm in the first position (the first block supports the first arm in first position) and a second block positioned between the second base assembly and the second arm (a second pin or fastener, i.e., a second block, extending through and between the second arm and 48A, 48B at 64A, 64B about which the second arm and 48A, 48B pivot) to support the second arm in the first position (the second block supports the second arm in first position). Regarding independent claim 14, Buxton teaches a method of supporting a thrust reverser (col 3 lines 32-34 describe thrust reversers incorporated into first and second cowling sections 18 and 19 which are shown in Fig. 3 and shown in open position as 18’, 19’ in Fig. 3A) on an engine mount (pylon 16, i.e., an engine mount, in Fig. 3; engine 12 is shown mounted to engine mount 16 via the mounting assembly in Fig. 3 which is described in col 3 lines 10-16) of an aircraft (10 in Figs. 1-2; col 3 lines 12-13 describe 10 is an aircraft with fuselage 15), the method comprising: connecting a support assembly (40, 54A, 54B, 42, 44A, 44B, 48A, 48B in Fig. 3A) to the engine mount (40 is connected to 16 as shown in Fig. 3); connecting a first arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) that extends from the support assembly to a first section of the thrust reverser (first arm is connected to and extends from 44A,44B of support assembly to first section 18’ of thrust reverser in Fig. 3A); connecting a second arm (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A) that extends from the support assembly to a second section of the thrust reverser (second arm is connected to and extends from 48A,48B of support assembly to second section 19’ of thrust reverser in Fig. 3A); positioning the first arm and the second arm at a first angular position relative to the support assembly (Figs. 2 and 3A show the first arm and the second arm at a first angular position relative to the support assembly) and supporting the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser in a first position (in Figs. 2 and 3A 18’ and 19’ are supported in a first position); and positioning the first arm and the second arm at a second angular position relative to the support assembly (Fig. 3 shows the first arm and the second arm at a second angular position relative to the support assembly) and supporting the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser in a second position (in Fig. 3 18 and 19 are supported in a second position). Regarding claim 15, Buxton further teaches pivoting the first arm and the second arm about pivot axes that extend through the support assembly (as shown in Figs. 2-3A, first arm and second arm pivot about, respectively, axis of 62 extending through 44A, 44B and axis of 66 extending through 48A, 48B) and pivoting the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser about a thrust reverser axis (18 and 19 are pivoted about a thrust reverser axis, 18 is pivoted about axis of 34 and 19 is pivoted about axis of 36 in light of instant specification [0046] describing thrust reverser pivot axis A, B of Fig. 5A that each section pivots about a respective thrust reverser axis) with the pivot axes and the thrust reverser axis being coincident (coincident is interpreted per Merriam-Webster online dictionary of occupying the same space or time and per instant specification [0057] that pivoting about multiple axes is coincident, i.e., done at the same time: as shown in Figs. 2-3A, pivoting about axes 34, 62, 36, 66 and axis through rollers 52A, 52B is coincident, i.e., done at the same time, when moving 18 and 19 into different positions). Regarding claim 16, Buxton further teaches connecting the first arm to a first Power Door Open System (PDOS) bracket (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A; first arm is connected to first PDOS bracket in Fig. 3A) on the first section (first PDOS bracket is on 18’) and the second arm to a second PDOS bracket (labeled in annotated Fig. 3A; second arm is connected to second PDOS bracket in Fig. 3A) on the second section (second PDOS bracket is on 19’). Buxton refers to a Power Door Open System of Crudden et al. 4399966 in col 1 lines 18-27 as a system in which each thrust reverser section is controlled by a separate hydraulic actuator, while an objective of Buxton’s invention per col 1 lines 67-68 to col 2 lines 1-2 is to keep the weight of the power system used to open and close the thrust reverser sections at a minimum. This is accomplished by having just one linear actuator 40 to move both 18 and 19 of the thrust reverser per col 3 lines 44-56. Therefore, Buxton teaches a Power Door Open System (PDOS) along with the first and second PDOS brackets as shown in annotated Fig. 3A. PNG media_image4.png 747 701 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Buxton further teaches supporting the first section and the second section in a first position (position shown in Figs. 2 and 3A) comprises positioning the first section and the second section in a fully open position (per col 2 lines 67-68 to col 3 lines 1-2 Fig. 3A shows fully open position, and per col 4 lines 9-13 describe 18’ and 19’ being in an open position). Regarding claim 20, Buxton further teaches supporting the first section and the second section in a second position (position shown in Fig. 3) comprises supporting the first section and the second section in a near closed position (18 and 19 are supported in a partially open position, i.e., a near closed position). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Buxton 4585189 in view of Sosnosky et al. 20220177148. Regarding claim 4, Buxton teaches all that is claimed above but does not explicitly teach the first base assembly and the first arm are mirror images of the second base assembly and the second arm. Sosnosky teaches a mounting assembly to support a thrust reverser from a pylon extending from a fuselage of an aircraft in Fig. 1D which is similar to Buxton Fig. 2. Sosnosky teaches components of the lower cowl mechanism 102b are generally equivalent to corresponding components of the upper cowl mechanism, but that the shape of the lower inboard pylon forked link 308b may be different from a shape of the upper inboard pylon forked link 308a; the invention also encompasses arrangements in which the upper and lower links have the same shape/bend angle, and where the upper cowl mechanism 102a is a mirror image copy of the lower cowl mechanism 102b (per [0112]). “When there is a design need or market pressure to solve a problem and there are a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, a person having ordinary skill has good reason to pursue the known options within his or her technical grasp. If this leads to the anticipated success, it is likely not the product of innovation, but of ordinary skill and common sense.” KSR at 1397. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Buxton to have the first base assembly and the first arm be mirror images of the second base assembly and the second arm as taught by Sosnosky as obvious to try and have a reasonable expectation of success in supporting the first and second sections of the thrust reverser. Claim(s) 5, 12 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Buxton 4585189 in view of Joret et al. 20170174353. Buxton teaches all that is claimed above but is silent regarding Claim 5: the mounting assembly is configured to support the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser within an angular range of 6° to 47°. Claim 12: the first arm and the second arm are configured to pivot within a range of 6° - 47° relative to respective pivot axes. Claim 18: moving the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser through an angular range of 6° - 47°. Joret teaches a propulsion unit for an aircraft and a method for opening a movable cowl of said propulsion unit per [0002]. Joret teaches (claim 5) a mounting assembly is configured to support a first section and a second section of a thrust reverser within an angular range of 6° to 47° (per [0018] regular maintenance operations concern equipment of the propulsion unit generally positioned close to the gas generator of the turbojet engine, more generally in an area of the propulsion unit having an opening angle of each half-cowl, i.e., first and second sections, of thrust reverser comprised between about 30 and 45 degrees which is within the claimed angular range of 6° to 47°); (claim 12) the first arm and the second arm are configured to pivot within a range of 6° - 47° relative to respective pivot axes (per [0089] FIG. 7 illustrates the half-cowl 109 in the regular maintenance position, the position in which the half-cowl 109 has pivoted at an angle comprised between about 30 and about 45 degrees relative to its operating position which is within the claimed angular range of 6° to 47°); (claim 18) moving the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser through an angular range of 6° - 47° (per [0011] in order to carry out maintenance of the turbojet engine 5, it is known to access the suspension mast 3 by pivoting, i.e., moving, each half-cowl 9 of the thrust reverser about axes 19 substantially collinear with a longitudinal axis 21 of the propulsion unit, thanks to the hinges 17, as shown in FIG. 2 schematically illustrating the downstream portion of the propulsion unit 1 in the maintenance position; in this position, each half-cowl 9 of the thrust reverser has pivoted about the axes 19, and an operator can access the turbojet 5 to perform maintenance of the turbojet engine and per [0018] regular maintenance operations concern equipment of the propulsion unit generally positioned close to the gas generator of the turbojet engine, more generally in an area of the propulsion unit having an opening angle of each half-cowl, i.e., first and second sections, of thrust reverser comprised between about 30 and 45 degrees which is within the claimed angular range of 6° to 47°). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Buxton per each of the following limitations regarding claims 5, 12 and 18, respectively, the mounting assembly configured to support the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser within an angular range of 6° to 47° the first arm and the second arm are configured to pivot within a range of 6° - 47° relative to respective pivot axes moving the first section and the second section of the thrust reverser through an angular range of 6° - 47° as taught by Joret to enable performing regular maintenance operations concerning equipment of the engine of the aircraft generally positioned close to the gas generator of the engine. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Buxton 4585189 in view of Stretton et al. 20210079810. Regarding claim 17, Buxton teaches all that is claimed above but does not explicitly teach positioning the first arm and the second arm forward of a forward edge of the thrust reverser. Stretton teaches a mounting assembly (60A Fig. 6) to support a thrust reverser (sections 65 in Fig. 6; [0009] describes thrust reverser outer cowl hinged opening for engine maintenance activities). Stretton teaches hinge structure 60A is at a forward location, i.e., the fore of the thrust reverser cowl doors per [0105]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Buxton to include positioning the first arm and the second arm forward of a forward edge of the thrust reverser as taught by Stretton as forward of the forward edge being a location at which an internal height of the nacelle is sufficient to accommodate the first and second arms and other mounting structures of the mounting assembly. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Each of the following prior art teach a mounting assembly to support a thrust reverser that is mounted to an aircraft: Burhans 4679750 – See Figs. 1-2 and 6-8. Vauchel et al. 20090165463 – See Fig. 10. Boileau et al. 20160101871 – See Fig. 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALYSON JOAN HARRINGTON whose telephone number is (571)272-2359. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am - 5 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phutthiwat Wongwian can be reached at (571) 270-5426. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.J.H./Examiner, Art Unit 3741 /LORNE E MEADE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590560
VANE HEATING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571351
GAS TURBINE ENGINE DEFINING A ROTOR CAVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12504171
PREMIXER FOR A COMBUSTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12486784
TURBINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12480447
REAL-TIME OPTICAL COKING SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+61.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month