Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/741,639

Dynamic Joint Alignment Brace For An Animal

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 12, 2024
Examiner
RODRIQUEZ, KARI KRISTIN
Art Unit
3786
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
235 granted / 425 resolved
-14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
451
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 425 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species B in the reply filed on 1/23/2026 is acknowledged. It is noted that while applicant elected “without traverse”, the applicant challenges that there are two resilient members having different biasing forces are shown in Figures 31-41. However, Figures 13-17 are a flat strip that extend between the first and second detachable mounting portions whereas the resilient members in Figures 31-41 are a plurality of rods that attach to superior segment 66. Applicant indicates claims 4-6 include the additional limitation of two resilient members and withdraw claims 3 and 8-18. It is noted that claims 4-6 depend from claim 3. Therefore, claims 8-18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/23/2026. Claims 1-18 are currently pending, of which claims 1-7 are being examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Prahl (US 4,203,433). Regarding claim 1, Prahl discloses a dynamic joint alignment brace for aligning an animal's leg to a joint (Figures 1-2 and 6; Abstract) comprising: a detachable mounting portion (6 on left side, insofar as supporting dish 6 is detachably mounted to the user’s leg; Figures 1-2) sized to operably engage the animal's leg (Figures 1-2); a resilient member (3, 5 on left side; Col. 3, lines 34-36) operably secured to the detachable mounting portion and biased to a neutral position (Figure 3; Col. 3, lines 43-49); and, the resilient member deflected from its neutral position when the detachable mounting portion is operably secured to the animal's leg such that the resilient member applies a biasing force (pressure in upward direction 7; Col. 3, lines 39-42) that urges the animal's leg into a desired alignment position relative to the animal's joint (Figures 1-2; Col. 3, line 54 to Col. 4, line 7). Regarding claim 2, Prahl discloses wherein the desired alignment position is abduction (Figures 1-2; Abstract; Col. 3, line 54 to Col. 4, line 7). Regarding claim 3, Prahl discloses a second detachable mounting portion (6 at opposite right end deteachably mounted to the user’s leg; Figures 1-2 and 6), the first detachable mounting portion operably secured to an animal's first leg, and the second detachable mounting portion operably secured to the animal's second leg (Figures 1-2); and, the resilient member extending between the first detachable mounting portion and the second detachable mounting portion (3, 5 is between the two supporting dishes 6). Regarding claim 4, Prahl discloses a second resilient member (3, 5 on right side, Figure 6) biased to a second neutral position extending between the first detachable mounting portion (Figure 6) and the second detachable mounting portion such that the second resilient member is deflected from the second neutral position thereby applying a second biasing force to the animal (Figures 1-2; Col. 3, line 54 to Col. 4, line 7). Regarding claim 5, Prahl discloses wherein the biasing force of the first resilient member is different from the second biasing force of the second resilient member (biasing force of left member 3, 5 is diagonally upward toward the left which is different than the right member 3, 5 which provides a biasing force diagonally upward toward the right; Figures 1, 2). Regarding claim 6, Prahl discloses wherein the desired alignment position is a combination of abduction and external rotation about the animal's joint (Figures 1-2; Col. 3, line 54 to Col. 4, line 7). Regarding claim 7, the device of Prahl is capable of use on a canine and the animal’s joint is a hip joint (Figures 1-2 due to its material/flexing properties which make it capable to be applied to a canine, col. 3, lines 50-62, col. 4, lines 1-8). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kari Rodriquez whose telephone number is 571-270-1909. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6-3 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alireza Nia can be reached at (571) 270-3076. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KARI K RODRIQUEZ/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594441
FACE MASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594209
LUMBER AND KNEE RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589017
ADJUSTABLE BODY BRACE AND ADJUSTING ASSEMBLY THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12533254
EXOSKELETON WITH A BACK PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12508165
Heated Hydrocolloid Patches For Skin Treatment
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+38.0%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 425 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month