Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/741,666

BIKE CARRIER ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2020 — TW 109212949 +1 more
Examiner
HELVEY, PETER N.
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
King Rack Industrial Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1399 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.2%
+42.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1399 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (US 2010/0230455). Wang discloses a bike carrier assembly comprising: a connection unit (10-30), at least one bike carrier or at least one shelf (302 closest to hinge 31; shelf not required), the at least one bike carrier connected to the connection 5unit (see Fig. 2), wherein the connection unit has a connector which is adapted to be connected to a vehicle (10), an adaptor (30) is connected to the connection unit and includes multiple first holes (34), an extension (305) is removably connected to the adaptor (indirectly connected through 302s, the extension includes multiple bores (openings for bolts); the bike carrier includes multiple second holes (304), multiple locking 10members extend through the second holes and the first holes to connect the at least one bike carrier to the adapter (307), Wang further discloses the adaptor is a U-shaped tube (Wang 30, see Fig. 2) and a bar (302 farthest from hinge 31 meets scope of being a ‘bar’) is connected between two ends of the U-shaped tube; the adaptor having two open ends (where rear lights 308 are installed). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US 2010/0230455) as applied to claims 1 and 2 above, and further in view of Holliday (US 5129559). Wang discloses all limitations of the claim(s) as detailed above except does not expressly disclose the caps as claimed. However, Holliday teaches providing cargo carrier tubing with end caps (28) as claimed. At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to add the end caps taught by Holliday to the tubing taught by Wang, in order to provide a smooth, finished end thereto as taught by Holliday (col. 3, ll. 53-57). Claim(s) 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US 2010/0230455) as applied to claims 1 and 2 above, and further in view of Ferreira (US 9550444). Wang discloses all limitations of the claim(s) as detailed above except does not expressly disclose the light unit as claimed. However, Ferreira teaches providing the upright extensions (146a, 146b) of a cargo carrier device with a light unit including a taillight, turning light, and brake light (149a, 149b) which is capable of being electrically connected to a cable of the vehicle (col. 6, ll. 60-65). At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to add the light units taught by Ferreira to the upright extension taught by Wang, in order to enhance the functionality of the carrier and allow the lights to be seen by vehicles behind the carrier vehicle as taught by Ferreira (col. 6, ll. 61-67). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER N. HELVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1423. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-7pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER N HELVEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 March 9, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630094
VEHICLE ROOF TRACK SUPPORT STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622493
HEAD-MOUNTABLE DEVICE BAND WITH A LATCH MOVABLE BY A TAB
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618643
HANDLESS SHOULDER-FIRE FIREARM CARRY SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617348
LUGGAGE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE INCLUDING SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617586
FITTING TOOL AND FITTING-TOOL-EQUIPPED BAG BODY
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1399 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month