Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/741,875

MULTIPLE LOCATION LOAD CONTROL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Examiner
FERNANDEZ, PEDRO C
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lutron Technology Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
191 granted / 252 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
264
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 252 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present Office Action is in response to Applicants’ filing of June 13, 2024. Claims 1-15 are presented for examination, with Claims 1, 6, and 11 being in independent form. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on June 13, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on November 12, 2025 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,052,810; 11,696,384; 11,184,970; 10,194,510; and 9,681,513 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Objections Claims 7-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: In Claim 7, line 1, “claim 1” should be --claim 6--; In Claim 8, line 1, “claim 1” should be --claim 6--; In Claim 9, line 1, “claim 1” should be --claim 6--; and In Claim 10, line 1, “claim1” should be --claim 6--; Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0160409 (“Carmen”). Regarding Claim 1, Carmen discloses a lighting control apparatus (main dimmer 102 in Figs. 1 and 10B, details in Fig. 3; [0033]; [0039]), comprising: a controllably conductive device (102) to receive an AC voltage input (106) and provide a phase controlled AC voltage (output of 102; [0039]-[0040]); a multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) coupled to the control circuit, the multi-location communication circuit including an accessory dimmer interface circuit communicatively couplable to one or more accessory dimmers (accessory dimmers 104; details in Fig. 7; [0063]-[0065]); and a control circuit coupled to the controllably conductive device and to the multi-location communication circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8), the control circuit to cause the multi-location communication circuit to: receive the AC voltage input (106; [0066]; [0033]); and provide an AC signal output to the accessory dimmer interface circuit (104; [0066]; [0033]) such that; during a first portion of the AC signal output period, provide power via the AC signal output to each of the one or more accessory dimmers via the multi-location communication circuit (charging time Tchrg in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]); and during a second portion of the AC signal output period, provide communication with the one or more accessory dimmers (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]). Regarding Claim 5, Carmen further discloses wherein to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) during the second portion of the AC signal output period (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]), the control circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8) to further: determine whether the AC signal output is in a pulled-up state; and responsive to the determination that the AC signal output is in the pulled-up state, receive, via the multi-location communication circuit, a message from one of the one or more accessory dimmers (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Regarding Claim 6, Carmen discloses a lighting control apparatus communication method (main dimmer 102 in Figs. 1 and 10B, details in Fig. 3; [0033]; [0039]), comprising: causing, by a control circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8), a communicatively coupled controllably conductive device to provide a phase-controlled AC output (output of 102; [0039]-[0040]) responsive to receipt of an AC voltage input (106); responsive to receipt of the AC voltage input (106; [0066]; [0033]), causing, by the control circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8), the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to provide an AC signal output to an accessory dimmer interface circuit (104; [0066]; [0033]) such that; during a first portion of the AC signal output period, the multi-location communication circuit provides power via the AC signal output to each of one or more communicatively coupled accessory dimmers (charging time Tchrg in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]); and during a second portion of the AC signal output period, the control circuit communicates with the one or more accessory dimmers via the multi-location communication circuit (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]). Regarding Claim 10, Carmen further discloses wherein causing the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) during the second portion of the AC signal output period (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]) further comprises: determining, by the control circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8), whether the AC signal output is in a pulled-up state; and receiving, by the control circuit via the multi-location communication circuit, a message from one of the one or more accessory dimmers responsive to the determination that the AC signal output is in the pulled-up state (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Regarding Claim 11, Carmen discloses a non-transitory, machine-readable, storage device that includes instructions that, when executed by a control circuit disposed in a lighting control apparatus ([0040]; controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8), cause a communicatively coupled controllably conductive device to provide a phase-controlled AC output (output of 102; [0039]-[0040]) responsive to receipt of an AC voltage input (106); responsive to receipt of the AC voltage input (106; [0066]; [0033]), cause a communicatively coupled multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to provide an AC signal output to an accessory dimmer interface circuit (104; [0066]; [0033]) such that; during a first portion of the AC signal output period, the multi-location communication circuit provides power via the AC signal output to each of one or more communicatively coupled accessory dimmers (charging time Tchrg in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]); and during a second portion of the AC signal output period, the control circuit communicates with the one or more accessory dimmers via the multi-location communication circuit (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]). Regarding Claim 15, Carmen further discloses wherein the instructions that cause the control circuit (controller 314 of main dimmer 102; Fig. 9A; [0067]-[0069]; Fig. 8) to cause the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) during the second portion of the AC signal output period (communication time Tcomm in Fig. 8; [0066]; [0033]) cause the control circuit to: determine whether the AC signal output is in a pulled-up state; and receive, via the multi-location communication circuit, a message from one of the one or more accessory dimmers responsive to the determination that the AC signal output is in the pulled-up state (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 3, 7, 8, 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0160409 (“Carmen”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 7,247,999 (“Kumar”). Regarding Claim 2, Carmen, as applied to Claim 1, further discloses wherein to provide communication with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period, the control circuit to further: cause the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-up the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimmer system as disclosed by Carmen with a forward phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a resistive or inductive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 11-12). Regarding Claim 3, Carmen, as applied to Claim 1, further discloses wherein to provide communication with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period, the control circuit to further: cause the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-down the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-down signal pulling AD line down; step 926 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0071]) . Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a reverse phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimmer system as disclosed by Carmen with a reverse phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a capacitive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 17-18). Regarding Claim 7, Carmen, as applied to Claim 6, further discloses wherein causing the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period further comprises: causing, by the control circuit, the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-up the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimming method as disclosed by Carmen with a forward phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a resistive or inductive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 11-12). Regarding Claim 8, as applied to Claim 6, Carmen further discloses wherein causing the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period further comprises: causing, by the control circuit, the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-down the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-down signal pulling AD line down; step 926 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0071]) . Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a reverse phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimming method as disclosed by Carmen with a reverse phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a capacitive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 17-18). Regarding Claim 12, Carmen, as applied to Claim 11, further discloses wherein the instructions that cause the control circuit to cause the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period further cause the control circuit to: cause the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-up the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-up signal pulling AD line high; step 916 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0070]). Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimmer system as disclosed by Carmen with a forward phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a resistive or inductive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 11-12). Regarding Claim 13, Carmen, as applied to Claim 11, further discloses wherein the instructions that cause the control circuit to cause the multi-location communication circuit to communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers during the second portion of the AC signal output period further cause the control circuit to: cause the multi-location communication circuit (Fig. 1, [0031]-[0033]; Fig. 10B, [0078]) to bidirectionally communicate with the one or more accessory dimmers (104) via pulling-down the AC signal output voltage responsive to the control circuit (pull-down signal pulling AD line down; step 926 in Fig. 9A; [0068]-[0071]) . Carmen does not specifically disclose causing the controllably conductive device to provide a reverse phase control AC voltage. However, Kumar, in the same field of endeavor teaches causing the controllably conductive device to provide a forward phase control AC voltage (col. 4, lines 5-19). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention, to have provided the dimmer system as disclosed by Carmen with a reverse phase control technique, as taught by Kumar, in order to control energy to a capacitive load, as evidenced by Kumar (col. 4, lines 17-18). Claims 4, 9 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0160409 (“Carmen”) in view of WO 2023/063646 (“Stelmach”). Regarding Claim 4, Carmen, as applied to Claim 1, fails to specifically disclose wherein the control circuit to further: cause the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period. However, Stelmach, in the same field of endeavor, teaches wherein the control circuit to further: cause the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period; that is, inserting a buffer period between two portions ([0044], lines 8-16; Fig. 5D). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have provided the communication portions as disclosed by Carmen and inserted a buffer period therebetween, in order to provide clear separation between the portions, and to account for delays due to circuit response times and propagation delays, as evidenced by Stelmach ([0044], lines 8-10). Regarding Claim 9, Carmen, as applied to Claim 6, fails to specifically disclose wherein causing, by the control circuit, the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period. However, Stelmach, in the same field of endeavor, teaches wherein causing, by the control circuit, the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period ([0044], lines 8-16; Fig. 5D). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have provided the communication portions as disclosed by Carmen and inserted a buffer period therebetween, in order to provide clear separation between the portions, and to account for delays due to circuit response times and propagation delays, as evidenced by Stelmach ([0044], lines 8-10). Regarding Claim 14, Carmen, as applied to Claim 11, fails to specifically disclose wherein the instructions, when executed by the control circuitry, further cause the control circuitry to: cause the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period. However, Stelmach, in the same field of endeavor, teaches wherein the instructions, when executed by the control circuitry, further cause the control circuitry to: cause the multi-location communication circuit to insert a buffer period between the first portion of the AC signal output period and the second portion of the AC signal output period ([0044], lines 8-16; Fig. 5D). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have provided the communication portions as disclosed by Carmen and inserted a buffer period therebetween, in order to provide clear separation between the portions, and to account for delays due to circuit response times and propagation delays, as evidenced by Stelmach ([0044], lines 8-10). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PEDRO C FERNANDEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-7050. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander H Taningco can be reached at 1-(571) 272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PEDRO C FERNANDEZ/Examiner, Art Unit 2844 /ALEXANDER H TANINGCO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12581581
AEROSOL-GENERATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12538397
CONTROLLING COLOR TEMPERATURE AND LUMINANCE IN LINEAR LED FIXTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12538395
ILLUMINATION DEVICE AND ILLUMINATION PROCESS WITH LIMITATION OF MAXIMUM IRRADIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12526897
Autonomous Circadian Lighting System with Environmental and Sensor Input
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12522132
VISUAL FRONT ALERT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 252 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month