Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/742,383

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Examiner
CAMERON, ATTICUS A
Art Unit
3658
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
CNH Industrial N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
51 granted / 62 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
126
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
73.2%
+33.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 62 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/21/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by et al. (US11027613, referred to as Lee). Regarding claim 1: discloses: An agricultural machine, comprising: a work vehicle comprising a vehicle wheel configured to move the work vehicle in a direction of travel; a wheel slip sensor configured to generate data indicative of wheel slip of the vehicle wheel relative to the ground; an agricultural implement configured to be towed by the work vehicle, the agricultural implement comprising: an implement wheel configured to move the agricultural implement in the direction of travel; and a regenerative brake assembly comprising: an energy storage device; an electric motor electrically coupled to the energy storage device; and a regenerative brake configured to rotationally drive the electric motor; and a computing system communicatively coupled to the wheel slip sensor and the regenerative brake, the computing system configured to: determine the wheel slip of the vehicle wheel based on the data generated by the wheel slip sensor; and control an operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor based on the determined wheel slip. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 2: Lee discloses: The agricultural machine of claim 1, Lee further discloses: the work vehicle further comprising: an engine configured to provide power to the vehicle wheel to move the work vehicle in the direction of travel; and an engine sensor configured to generate data indicative of a rotational speed of the engine, and wherein, the computing system is communicatively coupled to the engine sensor, the computing system further configured to: determine the rotational speed of the engine based on the data generated by the engine sensor; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor based on the determined rotational speed of the engine. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 3: Lee discloses: A system for controlling the operation of an agricultural implement, the system comprising: a vehicle wheel of a work vehicle configured to move the work vehicle in a direction of travel; a wheel slip sensor configured to generate data indicative of wheel slip of the vehicle wheel relative to the ground; an implement wheel of an agricultural implement configured to be towed by the work vehicle, the implement wheel configured to move the agricultural implement in the direction of travel; a regenerative brake assembly of the agricultural implement comprising: an energy storage device; an electric motor electrically coupled to the energy storage device, the electric motor configured to receive electrical power from the energy storage device for rotating the implement wheel, and supply power to the energy storage device; and a regenerative brake configured to rotationally drive the electric motor such that electric power is supplied by the electric motor to the energy storage device when the regenerative brake engages the electric motor; and a computing system communicatively coupled to the wheel slip sensor and the regenerative brake, the computing system configured to: determine the wheel slip of the vehicle wheel based on the data generated by the wheel slip sensor; and control an operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor based on the determined wheel slip. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 4: Lee discloses: The system of claim 3, Lee further discloses: wherein: increases in engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor result in increases in the electric power supplied by the electric motor to the energy storage device; and decreases in engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor result in decreases in the electric power supplied by the electric motor to the energy storage device. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 5: Lee discloses: The system of claim 4, Lee further discloses: wherein, when controlling the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor, the computing system is configured to: control the operation of the regenerative brake to increase engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with increases in the determined wheel slip of the vehicle wheel; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to decrease engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with decreases in the determined wheel slip of the vehicle wheel. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 6: Lee discloses: The system of claim 4, Lee further discloses: further comprising: a work vehicle engine configured to provide power to the vehicle wheel to move the work vehicle in the direction of travel; and an engine sensor configured to generate data indicative of a rotational speed of the engine, and wherein, the computing system is communicatively coupled to the engine sensor, the computing system further configured to: determine the rotational speed of the work vehicle engine based on the data generated by the engine sensor; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor based on the determined rotational speed of the work vehicle engine. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 7: Lee discloses: The system of claim 6, Lee further discloses: wherein, when controlling the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor, the computing system is configured to: control the operation of the regenerative brake to increase engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with increases in the determined rotational speed of the work vehicle engine; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to decrease engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with decreases in the determined rotational speed of the work vehicle engine. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 8: Lee discloses: The system of claim 3, Lee further discloses: further comprising: a terrain slope sensor configured to generate data indicative of a slope of terrain over which the work vehicle traverses, and wherein, the computing system is communicatively coupled to the terrain slop sensor, the computing system further configured to: determine when the work vehicle is traversing an incline based on the data generated by the terrain slope sensor; and determine the wheel slip of the vehicle wheel based on the data generated by the wheel slip sensor when it is determined that the work vehicle is traversing the incline. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 9: Lee discloses: The system of claim 8, Lee further discloses: wherein, after determining that the work vehicle is traversing an incline, the computing system is further configured to: determine when the work vehicle is traversing a decline based on the data generated by the terrain slope sensor; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor when it is determined that the work vehicle is traversing the decline based on the wheel slip of the vehicle wheel determined when the work vehicle was traversing the incline. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 10: Lee discloses: The system of claim 8, Lee further discloses: wherein the terrain slope sensor is configured as an inclinometer. ([col. 3, lines 23-30] Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108.) Regarding claim 11: Lee discloses: The system of claim 3, Lee further discloses: further comprising: a wheel speed sensor configured to generate data indicative of a rotational speed of the implement wheel, and wherein, the computing system is communicatively coupled to the wheel speed sensor, the computing system further configured to: determine the rotational speed of the implement wheel based on the data generated by the wheel speed sensor; and control the operation of the regenerative brake to increase engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with increases in the determined rotational speed of the implement wheel. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 12: Lee discloses: The system of claim 11, Lee further discloses: wherein the computing system is further configured to: control the operation of the regenerative brake to decrease engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with decreases in the determined rotational speed of the implement wheel. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 13: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 1. Regarding claim 14: Lee discloses: The method of claim 13, Lee further discloses: further comprising: when controlling the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor, controlling, with the computing system, the operation of the regenerative brake to increase engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with increases in the determined wheel slip of the vehicle wheel; and when controlling the operation of the regenerative brake to rotationally drive the electric motor, controlling, with the computing system, the operation of the regenerative brake to decrease engagement of the regenerative brake with the electric motor with decreases in the determined wheel slip of the vehicle wheel. ([col. 2, lines 30-38] The regenerative powertrain 108 may be adapted to convert mechanical power from the rotating front axle 104 and/or rear axle 106 into electrical power. The electrical power may be stored in a battery or other suitable electrical storage facility 110 which electrically interfaces 35 with the regenerative powertrain 108. The electrical power which is stored in the electrical storage facility 110 may be used in propulsion of the vehicle 102 such as in the conventional manner. [col. 3, lines 21-62] In the event that the front wheels 105 encounter a front tire impact event during vehicle braking, the wheel slip sensor 112 may detect wheel slippage at the front wheels 105 and responsively transmit the wheel slip sensor signal 114 to 25 the regenerative powertrain 108. Additionally or alternatively, the vehicle motion sensor 120 may detect acceleration, deceleration and/or other vehicle motion and responsively transmit the motion sensor signal 120 to the regenerative powertrain 108. The regenerative powertrain 30 108 may use the wheel slip and/or vehicle motion data to reduce regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107. The magnitude of the reduction in regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels 107 may be in proportion to the magnitude of wheel slippage which is detected by the wheel 35 slip sensor 112 at the front wheels 105 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected by the vehicle motion sensor 120. Therefore, the regenerative powertrain 108 may utilize the motion sensor signal 122 from the vehicle motion sensor 120 and/or the wheel slip sensor signal 114 from the 40 wheel slip sensor 112 to inhibit regenerative braking torque during braking of the vehicle 102 and maintain stability of the vehicle 102 during the front tire impact event. Referring next to FIG. 2 of the drawings, a block diagram 200 of an illustrative embodiment of a regenerative braking 45 control method is shown. The method 200 begins at block 202. At block 204, a determination may be made as to whether vehicle braking is being applied. If vehicle braking is not being applied, then the method may end at block 206. If vehicle braking is being applied at block 204, then at block 50 208 a determination may be made as to whether a front tire impact event is occurring. The front tire impact event may be detected based on wheel slip data and/or vehicle motion data. If a front tire impact event is not occurring at block 208, 55 then the method may end at block 206. If a front tire impact event is occurring, then regenerative braking torque at the rear wheels may be reduced at block 210. The magnitude of regenerative braking reduction may be proportional to the magnitude of slip which is detected at the front wheels 60 and/or the magnitude of vehicle motion which is detected during the front tire impact event.) Regarding claim 15: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 6. Regarding claim 16: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 7. Regarding claim 17: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 8. Regarding claim 18: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 9. Regarding claim 19: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 11. Regarding claim 20: Rejected using the same rationale as claim 12. Conclusion The prior art made of record, and not relied upon, considered pertinent to applicant' s disclosure or directed to the state of art is listed on the enclosed PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ATTICUS A CAMERON whose telephone number is 703-756-4535. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Worden can be reached on 571-272-4876. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ATTICUS A CAMERON/ Examiner, Art Unit 3658A /JASON HOLLOWAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3658
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636800
DAMAGE-POINT ESTIMATION DEVICE AND DAMAGE-POINT ESTIMATION METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12583445
VEHICLE CONTROLLER, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR VEHICLE CONTROL
2y 7m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586473
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO BUILD A FLYABLE HOLDING PATTERN ENTRY TRAJECTORY WHEN THE AVAILABLE SPACE IS LIMITED
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12544937
ROBOTIC HAND SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROBOTIC HAND
3y 10m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528448
HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE ENERGY MANAGEMENT DURING EXTREME OPERATING CONDITIONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 62 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month