Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/743,922

DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Jun 19, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0078468
Examiner
QUARTERMAN, KEVIN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 885 resolved
+22.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 885 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 23-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wolk (US 2014/0021492). Regarding independent claim 23, Wolk teaches a display apparatus comprising: a plurality of subpixels including an emitting area (Fig. 6; areas between Elements 100) and a non-emitting area (Fig. 6; area of Element 100) surrounding the emitting area; a pattern portion (Fig. 6, Element 100) disposed in the non-emitting area and surrounding a plurality of subpixels; a reflective portion (Fig. 6, Element 102; ¶ [0033]) disposed on the pattern portion and having a curved surface; and at least one optical path changing portion (Fig. 6, Element 104; ¶ [0032]) disposed in the emitting area and the non-emitting area. Regarding claim 24, Wolk teaches the pattern portion having a bottom surface and an inclined surface extended from the bottom surface (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 25, Wolk teaches the pattern portion including a pixel electrode (Fig. 6, Element 102) disposed along the inclined surface of the pattern portion; a bank layer (Fig. 6, Element 100) disposed on the pixel electrode; and a light emitting layer (Fig. 6, Element 99) disposed on the bank layer. Regarding claim 26, Wolk teaches the at least one optical path changing portion including a plurality of nano-lenses disposed on the pixel electrode (¶ [0033]). Regarding claim 27, Wolk teaches the pixel electrode including a first part (102) and a second part (106) extended from the first part, and wherein the first and second parts of the pixel electrode have an upper surface and a lower surface, and the lower surface of the first part is flat and faces the substrate (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 28, Wolk teaches the reflective portion including a reflective electrode disposed on the light emitting layer (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 29, Wolk teaches the at least one optical path changing portion having a width greater than a width of the emission area (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 30, Wolk teaches the plurality of nano-lenses disposed on an upper surface of the first and second parts of the pixel electrode (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 31, Wolk teaches the pattern portion including a first pattern line extended along a first direction and a second pattern line extended along a second direction (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 32, Wolk teaches the first pattern line disposed between adjacent subpixels for emitting light with a same color, and the second pattern line disposed between adjacent subpixels for emitting light with different color light (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 33, Wolk teaches the reflective portion and the at least one optical path changing portion configured to change optical paths of light in the emitting area and the non-emitting area (Fig. 6). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claim 1, the prior art of record neither shows or suggests a display apparatus comprising, in addition to other limitations of the claim, a substrate including a plurality of subpixels; a pattern portion having a concave shape; and a reflective portion disposed on the pattern portion, wherein each of the plurality of the subpixels includes a nano-lens portion spaced apart from the reflective portion. Due to their dependencies upon independent claim 1, claims 2-22 are also allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Shin (US 2022/0206612) teaches a display panel with nanostructure in a non-light emitting region. Kim (US 2019/0348624) teaches a light emitting display apparatus with a metal layer having an uneven surface. Lee (US 2018/0211979) teaches a light emitting display device with a light-emitting layer including semiconductor nanoparticles. Wolk (US 9,997,573) teaches nanostructures for OLED devices. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Quarterman whose telephone number is (571)272-2461. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece can be reached at (571) 272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kevin Quarterman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875 3 October 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772667
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768521
LIGHTING ELEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765244
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761510
FLEXIBLE ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANEL
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757578
DISPLAY PANEL, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 885 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month