Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/744,172

SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR POSITIONING BONE CUT GUIDE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2014 — provisional 61/946,428 +3 more
Examiner
COLEY, ZADE JAMES
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Blue Belt Technologies Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
579 granted / 802 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
818
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 802 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cheal et al. (US 2012/0323244; “Cheal”). Claim 21, Cheal discloses a system (Fig. 1) for use in orthopedic surgery on a bone (abstract), the system comprising: a cut guide (Fig. 2; 52, 54) configured to be positioned adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), the cut guide comprising a guide body (52, 54) configured to be coupled to the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), the guide body having a bone-facing surface (Fig. 2; surface facing the bone) and a guide member (54) configured to guide a cutting tool along a planned planar cutting trajectory (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]); wherein the cut guide includes two or more reconfigurable landing members (See Fig. A below showing a possibility of what could be considered the landing members, the screw coming off 52 towards the bone can still be considered a landing member as well) configured to securely and fixedly position the cut guide adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), wherein the two or more reconfigurable landing members comprise a structure separate from the guide body and fixable with the guide body so as to couple the guide body adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraphs [0042]-[0044]), wherein the two or more reconfigurable landing members are configured to removably couple to a landing site of the bone (Fig. A; note how the landing members are coupled to bone via the device; paragraph [0042]); a processing device (Fig. 1; 100) including cut guide positioning planning instructions stored therein to generate a cut guide positioning plan (paragraphs [0044]-[0072]), wherein the cut guide positioning plan is generated at least in part using a bone model (paragraphs [0044]-[0072]); a computer-controlled robotic arm (50) configured to assist an operator in positioning the cut guide adjacent the bone based on the cut guide positioning plan (paragraphs [0038]-[0045]); a communication interface (30) configured to display a real time perioperative target bone representation and the planned planar cutting trajectory of the bone (paragraphs [0051]-[0072]). PNG media_image1.png 396 475 media_image1.png Greyscale Fig. A: Annotated Fig. 2 of Cheal to help show claim limitations. Claim 22, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the guide body is configured to provide a secure attachment of the cut guide to the bone during performance of at least one bone cut (Fig. 2; paragraph [0048]). Claim 23, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the bone model includes a data set representing a bone having an anatomical origin comparable to the bone to be altered by the system (paragraphs [0046]-[0048]). Claim 24, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, further comprising a coupling receptacle preparation tool (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]; the saw prepares the bone for receiving the implant) configured to be operated manually by the operator to create a plurality of receptacles on the bone (Figs. 1-5; paragraphs [0042] and [0055]). Claim 25, Cheal discloses the system of claim 24, wherein the cut guide is configured to conform to the bone (Fig. 2). Claim 26, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the processing device further includes a surgical planning module (paragraph [0038]) configured to generate a surgical plan for altering at least a portion of the bone when the cut guide is positioned adjacent the bone (paragraphs [0038], [0045], and [0047]). Claim 27, Cheal discloses the system of claim 26, wherein the cutting tool is configured to be positioned within the guide member for resecting the bone based on the surgical plan (paragraphs [0042]; [0045], and [0047]). Claim 28, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the guide body is configured to be adjustably coupled to the bone using pins (Fig. 2; you could put a pin through the slot 54 if desired). Claim 29, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the bone model is one of a parametric model, a statistical model, or a statistical shape model (paragraphs [0046]-[0048]). Claim 30, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the bone model is generated using two-dimensional image data of the bone (paragraphs [0046]-[0048] and [0062]-[0069]). Claim 31, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the bone is a femur (abstract; paragraphs [0001]-[0003]). Claim 32, Cheal discloses the system of claim 31, wherein the planned planar cutting trajectory corresponds to a distal femur cut in a total knee arthroplasty procedure (paragraphs [0001]-[0003]). Claim 33, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the bone is a tibia (paragraphs [0001]-[0003]). Claim 34, Cheal discloses the system of claim 33, wherein the planned planar cutting trajectory corresponds to a proximal tibial cut in a total knee arthroplasty procedure (paragraphs [0001]-[0003]). Claim 35, Cheal discloses the system of claim 21, wherein the cut guide positioning plan can be modified intraoperatively (Fig. 8; paragraphs [0050] and [0055]). Claim 36, Cheal discloses a system (Fig. 1) for use in orthopedic surgery on a bone (abstract), the system comprising: a cut guide (Fig. 2; 52, 54) to be positioned adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), the cut guide comprising a guide body (52, 54) configured to be coupled to the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), the guide body having an exterior surface (Fig. 2; outer surface) and a guide member (54) configured to guide a cutting tool along a planned planar cutting trajectory (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]); wherein the cut guide includes two or more reconfigurable landing members (See Fig. A above showing a possibility of what could be considered the landing members, the screw coming off 52 towards the bone can still be considered a landing member as well) configured to securely and fixedly position the cut guide adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]), wherein the two or more reconfigurable landing members comprise a structure separate from the guide body and fixable with the guide body so as to couple the guide body adjacent the bone (Fig. 2; paragraphs [0042]-[0044]), wherein the two or more reconfigurable landing members are configured to removably couple to a landing site of the bone (Fig. A; note how the landing members are coupled to bone via the device; paragraph [0042]); a processing device (Fig. 1; 100) including cut guide positioning planning instructions stored therein to generate a cut guide positioning plan (paragraphs [0044]-[0072]), wherein the cut guide positioning plan is generated at least in part using a bone model (paragraphs [0044]-[0072]); a communication interface (30) configured to display a real time perioperative target bone representation and the planned planar cutting trajectory of the bone (paragraphs [0051]-[0072]). Claim 37, Cheal discloses the system of claim 36, further comprising a coupling receptacle preparation tool (Fig. 2; paragraph [0042]; the saw prepares the bone for receiving the implant) configured to be operated manually by the operator to create a plurality of receptacles on the bone (Figs. 1-5; paragraphs [0042] and [0055]). Claim 38, Cheal discloses the system of claim 36, wherein the cut guide is configured to be adjustably positioned to conform to the bone (Figs. 2 and 8; paragraph [0043]). Response to Arguments In response to Applicant’s arguments that Cheal fails to disclose the landing members being couplable to the bone, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. The entire device 50 is said to be mountable to the bone (paragraph [0042]). Therefore, the two landing members as pointed out by Fig. A, which are part of device 50, are removably coupled to the bone. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Zade Coley whose telephone number is (571)270-1931. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9-5) PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong can be reached at (571)272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Zade Coley/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 12, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740816
ACTIVE COMPRESSION BONE SCREW
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733943
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ROBOTIC ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733946
SHOULDER PROSTHESIS COMPONENTS AND ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734047
APPARATUS FOR ALIGNING AN ACETABULAR CUP
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721663
Locking System For Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 802 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month