Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/744,459

HYDRAULIC UNIT AND BRAKE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 07, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0152664
Examiner
BURCH, MELODY M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
HL Mando Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
676 granted / 1052 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1090
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1052 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 12, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP-2019104398 (JP’398) in view of JP-6676440 (JP’440). Re: claim 1. JP’398 shows in figures 2 and 3 a hydraulic unit comprising: a hydraulic block, as labeled, including a cylinder bore provided with a master cylinder 6 connected to a brake pedal 100 shown in figure 1 via element 101, a motor bore provided with a motor, as labeled, that generates hydraulic pressure by operating by an electrical signal output corresponding to displacement of the brake pedal, a hydraulic flow path, and a valve bore provided with a valve or one of the valves shown in figure 1 that controls a flow [AltContent: textbox (Second surface)] [AltContent: textbox (Short width)][AltContent: textbox (Long width)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: connector][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Third surface)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (1st connector housing a 1st circuit board)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Motor)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Hydraulic block)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 222 216 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (First surface)] [AltContent: textbox (1st connector )][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Fourth surface (claim 2))][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 400 577 media_image2.png Greyscale of a pressurized medium through the hydraulic flow path; and an electronic control unit shown in the area of lead arrows 18 or 90 configured to control operation of the motor and the valve based on information on the displacement of the brake pedal, wherein the motor bore is provided on a first surface, as labeled, of the hydraulic block and a housing of the electronic control unit is provided on a second surface, as labeled, of the hydraulic block opposite to the first surface, the electronic control unit includes a first circuit board, a first connector configured to supply electric power or transmit an electrical signal to the first circuit board is positioned on an upper side of a third surface, as labeled, forming an upper surface between the first surface and the second surface as shown in figure 3, but is silent with regard to a second circuit board and a second connector as recited. JP’440 teaches in figure 4 the use of an electronic control unit including both first 92 and second 93 connectors housing first and second circuit boards, respectively. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the electronic control unit of JP’398 to have also included a second connector housing a second circuit board, in view of the teachings of JP’440, in order to provide a means of redundancy by having more than one circuit board and connector to operate in case of failure of the other circuit board and connector to ensure that the hydraulic unit remains operational even in the event of a fault. Examiner notes that it would have been obvious to have placed the second connector on the opposite side from the first connector such that it extended along the fourth surface since all of the other surfaces of the hydraulic block are occupied – first surface with the motor, second surface with the electronic control unit, third surface with the first connector. Re: claim 2. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figures 2 and 3 of JP’398 wherein the hydraulic unit comprises a reservoir shown in the area of element number 4 in figure 2 in which the pressurized medium is accommodated, wherein the hydraulic block further includes a reservoir bore shown at the right end of 10R2 in figure 2 communicating with the reservoir as shown, and the reservoir bore is provided in the fourth surface (as labeled in the alternative interpretation for claim 2) of the hydraulic block. Re: claim 4. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figures 2 and 3 of JP’398 wherein the first connector, as labeled, is positioned between an upper end of the reservoir and the third surface as shown. Re: claim 6. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figures 2 and 3 of JP’398 wherein the first connector, as labeled, is disposed so that a power supply unit 204 enters and engages in a direction corresponding to a thickness direction between the first surface, as labeled, and the second surface, as labeled, as shown. [AltContent: textbox (Reservoir chambers)] [AltContent: textbox (One of the partition walls)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image3.png 222 562 media_image3.png Greyscale Re: claim 7. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figure 1 of JP’398 wherein the reservoir shown in the area of number 4 includes a plurality of chambers, as labeled, partitioned by a plurality of partition walls, one of which labeled, and at least one reservoir bore 10R2 is provided to correspondingly communicate with the plurality of chambers, but is silent with regard to the at least one reservoir bore being a plurality of reservoir bores. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the at least one reservoir bore to have been a plurality of bores, in order to provide a level of redundancy for fluid flow from the reservoir to the hydraulic block in case one reservoir bore gets jammed or clogged. See In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960) (Claims at issue were directed to a water-tight masonry structure wherein a water seal of flexible material fills the joints which form between adjacent pours of concrete. The claimed water seal has a “web” which lies in the joint, and a plurality of “ribs” projecting outwardly from each side of the web into one of the adjacent concrete slabs. The prior art disclosed a flexible water stop for preventing passage of water between masses of concrete in the shape of a plus sign (+). Although the reference did not disclose a plurality of ribs, the court held that mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced.). MPEP 2144.04(VI)(B). Re: claim 12. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figure 8 of JP’398 wherein the upper end of the housing shown in the area at the end of the lead arrows or 18 or 90 is positioned below the upper end of the reservoir shown in the area of element 4 as shown. Re: claim 17. JP’398, as modified, teaches in figures 2 and 3 of JP’398 wherein the first connector is formed to have a long width and a short width and the long width of the first connector is formed in a front-rear direction Z on the housing as shown. Claim(s) 5 and 7-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO-2023153912 (WO’912) in view of JP-2019104398 (JP’398). Re: claim 5. WO’912 shows a second connector 140 disposed on the hydraulic block 200 but is silent with regard to a power supply as recited. JP’398 teaches in figures 2 and 3 of JP’398 wherein a connector, as labeled, is disposed so that a power supply unit 204 enters and engages in a direction corresponding to a thickness direction between the first surface, as labeled, and the second surface, as labeled, as shown. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the hydraulic block of WO’912 to have included a power supply unit, as recited, in view of the teachings of JP’398 in order to provide a means of being in close proximity to the components of the hydraulic unit that need powering to improve response time. Re: claim 7. WO’912 discloses in the consecutive paragraphs beginning “A reservoir connection port 241” the use of a plurality of reservoir bores 241 provided to communicate with the reservoir 400 but is silent with regard to the reservoir having separate chambers separated by partition walls. JP’398 teaches in figure 1 of JP’398 wherein the reservoir shown in the area of number 4 includes a plurality of chambers, as labeled, partitioned by a plurality of partition walls, one of which labeled, and at least one reservoir bore 10R2 is provided to correspondingly communicate with the plurality of chambers. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the reservoir of WO’912 to have included a plurality of chambers partitioned by a plurality of partition walls, in view of the teachings of JP’398, in order to provide a means of reducing sloshing, improving pressure management, and providing redundancy. Re: claim 8. WO’912, as modified, teaches in figure 4 of WO’912 the use of bores 241b and 241c being arranged in a direction corresponding to a thickness direction of the fourth surface. Re: claim 9. WO’912, as modified, is silent with regard to the recited rising portion. JP’398 teaches in figure 3 at area 809 the use of a rising portion formed to protrude on the first surface so that a thickness of the fourth surface beyond area 809 is greater than a thickness shown in the area of 80A between the first surface and the second surface. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the first surface of WO’912, as modified, to have been provided with a rising portion, in view of the teachings of JP’398, to have included an area with less thickness to save on material resulting in a cost savings. Re: claim 10. WO’912, as modified, teaches in figure 11 of WO’912 wherein the reservoir 400 is disposed relatively higher than the second connector 140 on the hydraulic block 200. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 11-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WO-2023153912 (WO’912). Re: claims 1 and 18. WO’912 shows in figures 2 and 3 a hydraulic unit comprising: a hydraulic block 200 including a cylinder bore provided with a master cylinder 500 connected to a brake pedal described as being connected to input rod 520, a motor bore provided with a motor 300 that generates hydraulic pressure by operating by an electrical signal output corresponding to displacement of the brake pedal, a hydraulic flow path, and a valve bore provided with a valve or one of the valves described in the abstract that controls a flow of a pressurized medium through the hydraulic flow path described in the paragraph under Tech-Solution; [AltContent: textbox (Third surface)][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (Fifth surface)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Fourth surface)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image4.png 301 401 media_image4.png Greyscale and an electronic control unit 100 configured to control operation of the motor and the valve based on information on the displacement of the brake pedal, wherein the motor bore is provided on a first surface shown at the end of the lead line of 200 in figure 1 of the hydraulic block 200 and a housing 110 of the electronic control unit 100 is provided on a second surface, shown opposite the first surface, of the hydraulic block opposite to the first surface, the electronic control unit 100 includes a first circuit board within element 130 and a second circuit board within element 140, a first connector 130 configured to supply electric power or transmit an electrical signal to the first circuit board is positioned on an upper side of a third surface, as labeled, forming an upper surface between the first surface and the second surface as shown in figure 3, a second connector 140 configured to supply electric power or transmit an electrical signal to the second circuit board is positioned on a front side of a fourth surface, as labeled, forming a front surface between the first surface and the second surface as shown in figure 1. Re: claim 2. WO’912 shows in figure 1 the hydraulic unit comprising a reservoir 400 in which the pressurized medium is accommodated, wherein the hydraulic block further includes a reservoir bore communicating with the reservoir, and the reservoir bore is provided in the fourth surface, as labeled, of the hydraulic block. Re: claim 3. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein the second connector 140 is positioned between a front end of the reservoir shown at the end of the lead line of number 400 and the fourth surface, as labeled. Re: claim 4. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein the first connector 130 is positioned between an upper end of the reservoir shown in the area of elements 640 and the third surface particularly the right side of the third surface. Re: claim 11. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein a front end of the housing 110 is positioned behind the front end of the reservoir 400 as shown in figure 1. Re: claim 12. WO’912 shows in figure 11 wherein an upper end of the housing 110 is positioned below the upper end of the reservoir 400. Re: claims 13 and 14. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein the cylinder bore is provided in a fifth surface, as labeled, that forms a rear surface between the first surface and the second surface of the hydraulic block and is a surface opposite to the fourth surface as shown in figure 1. Re: claim 15. WO’912 shows in figure 11 wherein the hydraulic block 200 further includes a plurality of wheel ports 210a-210d to which a plurality of wheel cylinders described in the abstract are connected, respectively, and the wheel ports are provided on the first surface of the hydraulic block 200 as shown in figure 11. Re: claims 16 and 20. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein the second connector 140 is formed to have a long width shown up and down along the surface at the end of the lead line of 140 and a short width shown perpendicular to the long width, and the long width of the second connector is disposed in an up-down direction on the housing 110 as shown in figure 1. Re: claim 17. WO’912 shows in figure 1 wherein the first connector 130 is formed to have a long width shown left-right along the surface at the end of the lead line of number 130 and a short width shown perpendicular to the long width, and the long width of the first connector is disposed in the front-rear direction on the housing 110 as shown in figure 1. Re: claim 19. WO’912 shows in figure 11 wherein the reservoir 400 is disposed relatively higher than the second connector 140 on the hydraulic block 200. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the brake pedal, hydraulic flow path, first and second circuit board, and reservoir chamber must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). Some of the elements were described as not being shown in the specification or do not have a corresponding reference number. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Applications: 2021/0039614 and 2022/0161774 as well as WO-2014045791 teach the use of similar hydraulic units. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELODY M BURCH whose telephone number is (571)272-7114. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 6:30AM-3PM, generally. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. mmb September 19, 2026 /MELODY M BURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747768
METERING NEEDLE FOR OLEO-PNEUMATIC-TYPE SHOCK ABSORBER
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742486
SHOCK ABSORBER
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736103
END-STOP CONTROL VALVES FOR PROVIDING PROGESSIVE DAMPING FORCES IN VIBRATION DAMPERS
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722440
Multi-Stage Adjusting Damping Valve, As Well As Shock Absorber And Suspension System Using Damping Valve
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698818
SUSPENSION DAMPER WITH REMOTELY-OPERABLE VALVE
10y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+26.3%)
3y 5m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1052 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month