Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/746,444

POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND POWER MANAGEMENT METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 18, 2024
Priority
Aug 02, 2023 — JP 2023-125958
Examiner
PATEL, JIGNESHKUMAR C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
366 granted / 462 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
481
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 462 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application 2. Claim 1-5 have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on the merits. Drawings 3. The drawings filed on 6/18/24 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Specification 4. The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (2) as being anticipated by Nakazawa (US PG Pub: 2024/0380214). 6. Regarding claim 1, Nakazawa discloses: A power management system that manages power supply and demand in a power grid including a plurality of power balancing resources (e.g., As illustrated in FIG. 3, the power management server 200 includes a manager 210, a communicator 220, and a controller 230. In the embodiment, the power management server 200 is an example of a power management apparatus. The power management server 200 is communicable with the facility 100 via the network 11, and may be considered as a server operating on a cloud) (Para. [0035]), the power management system comprising: a controller that controls a corresponding resource that is a corresponding one of the power balancing resources (e.g., The EMS 150 manages the power related to the facility 100. The EMS 150 may control the solar cell apparatus 110, the power storage apparatus 120, the fuel cell apparatus 130, and the load device 140. In the embodiment, the EMS 150 is exemplified as a device receiving a control command from the power management server 200. However, such a device may be referred to as a gateway or simply a control unit. The details of the EMS 150 will be described below (see FIG. 4)) (Para. [0030]); and a server that sets power management control to be performed on the corresponding resource by the controller (e.g., The controller 153 may control the solar cell apparatus 110, the power storage apparatus 120, and the fuel cell apparatus 130. The controller 153 may control the load device 140. For example, the controller 153 controls the charge-discharge of the power storage apparatus 120, based on the control command received from the power management server 200. The control command is transmitted from the power management server 200 in accordance with the charge-discharge plan created by the power management server 200.) (Para. [0049]), wherein: the power management control includes a first control instructing the controller to control the corresponding resource based on a power supply and demand plan developed in advance (e.g., The controller 153 may control the solar cell apparatus 110, the power storage apparatus 120, and the fuel cell apparatus 130. The controller 153 may control the load device 140. For example, the controller 153 controls the charge-discharge of the power storage apparatus 120, based on the control command received from the power management server 200. The control command is transmitted from the power management server 200 in accordance with the charge-discharge plan created by the power management server 200 ) (Para. [0049], the charge-discharge plan is interpreted as first control), and a second control instructing the controller to control the corresponding resource based on an actual situation of surplus power and demand power of the corresponding resource (e.g., In step S20, the power management server 200 may receive the actual value of the demand power or the power consumption of the facility 100 from the facility 100 (for example, the measurement device 160). The power management server 200 may receive the actual value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the predicted value of the demand power or the power consumption of the facility 100 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the predicted value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the power generation impact information, the power outage impact information, and the like from the external server 300. In step S22, the power management server 200 corrects the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120 based on the actual value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 and the actual value of the power consumption of the facility 100. The power management server 200 may correct the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120 based on the latest information of the predicted value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 and the latest information of the predicted value of the power consumption of the facility 100. In correcting the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120, the priorities of the respective modes of charge-discharge control are used. Step S22 is an example of the second timing) (Para. [0085]-[0086], Fig. 8, the control based on corrected charge-discharge plan is interpreted as second control); and during execution of the first control, the server instructs the controller to perform the second control during a period in which at least one of power sale of the surplus power and power purchase of the demand power is predicted to occur in the corresponding resource (e.g., In step S12, the power management server 200 creates the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120, based on the predicted value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 and the predicted value of the power consumption of the facility 100. In creating the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120, the priorities of the respective modes of charge-discharge control are used. Step S12 is an example of the first timing. In step S14, the power management server 200 transmits the control command to the facility 100 in accordance with the charge-discharge plan created in step S12. The control command may be transmitted for each target interval or may be transmitted for each unit time included in the target interval. Note that, in FIG. 8, the processing in steps S10 to S14 may be considered to be processing executed before the target interval. In step S20, the power management server 200 may receive the actual value of the demand power or the power consumption of the facility 100 from the facility 100 (for example, the measurement device 160). The power management server 200 may receive the actual value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the predicted value of the demand power or the power consumption of the facility 100 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the predicted value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 from the facility 100. The power management server 200 may receive the latest information of the power generation impact information, the power outage impact information, and the like from the external server 300. In step S22, the power management server 200 corrects the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120 based on the actual value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 and the actual value of the power consumption of the facility 100. The power management server 200 may correct the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120 based on the latest information of the predicted value of the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 and the latest information of the predicted value of the power consumption of the facility 100. In correcting the charge-discharge plan for the power storage apparatus 120, the priorities of the respective modes of charge-discharge control are used. Step S22 is an example of the second timing. In step S24, the power management server 200 transmits the control command to the facility 100 in accordance with the charge-discharge plan corrected in step S22. The control command may be transmitted for each target interval or may be transmitted for each unit time included in the target interval) (Para. [0082]-[0087], Fig. 8). 7. Regarding claim 2, Nakazawa discloses: The power management system according to claim 1, wherein during execution of the second control, the server instructs the controller to perform the first control during a period in which neither the power sale of the surplus power nor the power purchase of the demand power is predicted to occur (e.g., The surplus charge is control (charge control) to charge the power storage apparatus 120 with the surplus power of the power generation apparatus. For example, the surplus power is power obtained by subtracting the power consumption of the facility 100 (for example, power consumption of the load device 140) from the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110. The surplus charge can be executed in a time zone (for example, 5:00 to 19:00) in which the output power of the solar cell apparatus 110 is assumed to be obtained) (Para. [0053]). 8. Regarding claim 3, Nakazawa discloses: The power management system according to claim 2, wherein while the server has a control right of the corresponding resource in the first control, the server transfers the control right to the controller in the second control (e.g., The controller 153 may control the solar cell apparatus 110, the power storage apparatus 120, and the fuel cell apparatus 130. The controller 153 may control the load device 140. For example, the controller 153 controls the charge-discharge of the power storage apparatus 120, based on the control command received from the power management server 200. The control command is transmitted from the power management server 200 in accordance with the charge-discharge plan created by the power management server 200.) (Para. [0049]). 9. Regarding claim 4, Nakazawa discloses: The power management system according to claim 1, wherein: each of the power balancing resources belongs to either of a first group and a second group; the first group includes at least one of a water heater, an electrified vehicle, a storage battery, and a fuel cell (e.g., Examples of the purpose of using the power storage apparatus are considered to include a purpose of charging the power storage apparatus with the surplus power of the power generation apparatus such as the solar cell apparatus (hereinafter, surplus charge purpose) and a purpose of discharging power for curbing the peak power in a predetermined time interval (for example, 30 minutes) to a threshold value or less from the power storage apparatus (hereinafter, peak cut purpose)) (power storage apparatus is a storage battery) (Para. [0103]); the second group includes at least one of an air conditioner, a lighting device, and a photovoltaic power generation facility (e.g., The power generation apparatus may be one or more power generation apparatuses selected from the fuel cell apparatus, a wind power generation apparatus, a water power generation apparatus, a geothermal power generation apparatus, and a biomass power generation apparatus.) (Para. [0099]); and while the server sets, among the power balancing resources, a power balancing resource belonging to the first group as a control target of the first control and the second control, the server does not set, among the power balancing resources, a power balancing resource belonging to the second group as the control target (e.g., As described above, the remaining amount adjustment includes control to secure the power storage capacity of the power storage apparatus 120 for the peak cut. In other words, the remaining amount adjustment is an example of the first control to secure the power storage capacity of the power storage apparatus 120 in order to curb the demand power of the facility 100 to the predetermined power or less by discharging the power storage apparatus 120 in the predetermined time interval. The remaining amount adjustment includes control to secure a free capacity of the power storage apparatus 120 for the surplus charge. In other words, the remaining amount adjustment is an example of the second control to secure the free capacity of the power storage apparatus in order to charge the power storage apparatus 120 with the surplus power of the power generation apparatus.) (Para. [0056]). 10. Regarding claim 5, Claim 5 recites a power management method that implement the power management system of claim 1, with substantially the same limitations. Therefore the rejection applied to claim 1 also applies to claim 5 respectively. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tateiwa (Pub: 2023/0387682) disclose a control method for causing a computer to execute processing of: acquiring supply information indicating supply power supplied to a power grid and grid information indicating a grid capacity of the power grid; determining whether or not the supply power exceeds the grid capacity based on the supply information and the grid information; and if it is determined that the grid capacity is exceeded, performing control so that surplus power exceeding the grid capacity is supplied to a computing device constituting a predetermined distributed computing system (Para. [0007]). Nakayama (Pub: 2017/0012428) disclose a control method of a power control system according to the disclosure is a control method of a power control system that is provided in a consumer's facility and performs power control, the consumer's facility including a power generation device and other distributed power sources, the power generation device generating power while a current sensor detects forward power flow, the control method including: outputting power supplied from the other distributed power sources, in a state where the power generation device and the other distributed power sources are paralleled off from a grid; stepping down the power supplied from the other distributed power sources; and supplying a dummy current detectable by the current sensor as a current in the same direction as the forward power flow, using the stepped down power (Para. [0010]). Arakawa (Pub: 2013/0275290) disclose a surplus electricity trading system including: a surplus electricity supply system adapted to generate electricity and supply surplus electricity (Para. [0012]). Baba (Pub:2013/0049695) disclose an electric power control apparatus for controlling the connection of an electrical grid of a commercial power source and a distributed power source of a consumer dwelling, and a grid connection system provided with the same (Para. [0001]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-0698. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth M. Lo can be reached at (571)272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIGNESHKUMAR C PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699369
DATA-ANALYSIS-BASED PROCESSING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDED CONTROL SETPOINT
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693638
RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR ADVANCED PROCESS CONTROL LIMITS USING INSTANCE-BASED LEARNING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693656
NUMERICAL CONTROL DEVICE AND MACHINING METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687822
LEARNING CONTROL DEVICE, LEARNING CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687824
MANUFACTURING CLOUD SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.3%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 462 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month