Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/746,684

Session Establishment for Cellular Wireless Devices

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 18, 2024
Priority
Dec 31, 2021 — provisional 63/295,689 +1 more
Examiner
PATEL, JAY P
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
791 granted / 936 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
964
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
62.9%
+22.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 936 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 11-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US Publication 2018/0376444 A1). In regards to claims 1, 11 and 20, Kim et al. (US Publication 2018/0376444 A1) teaches, a method comprising: receiving, by a base station from a first core network function, a configuration message for an uplink packet flow between the base station and a second core network function for one or more wireless devices (see figure 15 step 2, N2 Request form AMF to RAN; see paragraphs 482-483; 9. AMF to (R)AN: N2 Request (N2 SM information received from SMF, security context, AMF Signaling Connection ID, Handover Restriction List, MM NAS Service Accept); RAN stores the Security Context, AMF Signaling Connection Id, QoS Information for the QoS Flows of the PDU Sessions that are activated and N3 Tunnel IDs in the UE RAN context); and transmitting, by the base station to the second core network function and based on the configuration message, a data packet of the uplink packet flow, wherein the data packet is based on information from the one or more wireless devices (see figure 15, step 11; UE to RAN to UPF; see paragraph 489; After the User Plane radio resources are setup, the uplink data from the UE may now be forwarded to RAN. The 5G RAN transmits the uplink data to the UPF address and Tunnel ID provided in the step 4). In regards to claims 2 and 12, Kim teaches, transmitting, by the base station to the first core network function, a message requesting the uplink packet flow, wherein the receiving the configuration message is in response to the message (see figure 15, step 2, RAN to AMF; see paragraph 455; N2 Message (MM NAS Service Request, 5G Temporary ID, Location information, RAT type, RRC establishment cause). Details of this step are described in RAN specifications). In regards to claims 3 and 13, Kim teaches, wherein the message requesting the uplink packet flow comprises one or both of: an establishment request of the uplink packet flow; or an identifier of the packet flow (see figure 15, step 2, RAN to AMF; see paragraph 455; N2 Message (MM NAS Service Request, 5G Temporary ID, Location information, RAT type, RRC establishment cause). Details of this step are described in RAN specifications; MM NAS service request reads on request of the uplink packet flow). In regards to claims 4 and 14, Kim teaches, receiving, by the base station from the one or more wireless devices, one or more signals; and determining, based on the one or more signals, to request the uplink packet flow (see figure 15, step 1, UE to RAN; see paragraph 451; UE to (R)AN: MM NAS Service Request (PDU session ID(s), security parameters, PDU session status)). In regards to claims 5 and 15, Kim teaches, wherein the uplink packet flow comprises a session, a data flow, or a quality of service (QoS) flow (see paragraphs 486, 487, 488, 489; the QoS flows of the PDU sessions). In regards to claims 6 and 16, Kim teaches, selecting the uplink packet flow from one or more uplink packet flows established between the one or more wireless devices and the second core network function (see paragraph 453; When the Service Request is triggered for user data, the UE includes the PDU session ID(s) in NAS Service Request message to indicate the PDU session(s) that the UE needs to use. When the Service Request is triggered for signaling only, the UE doesn't include any PDU session ID. When this procedure is triggered for paging response, in the case that the UE needs to use some PDU session(s), the UE includes the PDU session ID(s) in MM NAS Service Request message to indicate the PDU session(s) that the UE needs to use). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7-10 and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. as stated above, and further in view of Shahid et al. (US Publication 2021/0152278 A1). In regards to claims 7-10 and 17-19, Kim teaches all the limitations of the parent claims as stated above. In regards to claims 7-10 and 17-19, Kim fails to teach, Kim teaches, receiving, from the one or more wireless devices, one or more signals; and determining, based on the one or more signals, the information, wherein the information is determined based on one or more received power values of the one or more signals, receiving, by the base station from the one or more wireless devices, one or more signals; determining, by the base station, that a number of the one or more signals satisfy a condition; and transmitting, by the base station to the first core network function, a request for the uplink packet flow in response to the condition being satisfied and wherein the condition comprises that the number of the one or more signals is greater than a threshold. In regards to claims 7-10, Shahid et al. (US Publication 2021/0152278 A1) teaches, receiving, from the one or more wireless devices, one or more signals; and determining, based on the one or more signals, the information (see figure 2, steps 202-204, receiving a UE report from the UE and determining a device metric associated with the UE), wherein the information is determined based on one or more received power values of the one or more signals (see figure 2 steps 206; see figure 3 steps 306 and paragraph 43; the RAN can additionally determine that the device metric (e.g., device temperature, device power consumption, etc.) exceed the threshold), receiving, by the base station from the one or more wireless devices, one or more signals (see figure 2, steps 202-204, receiving a UE report from the UE and determining a device metric associated with the UE); determining, by the base station, that a number of the one or more signals satisfy a condition (see figure 2 steps 206; see figure 3 steps 306 and paragraph 43; the RAN can additionally determine that the device metric (e.g., device temperature, device power consumption, etc.) exceed the threshold); and transmitting, by the base station to the first core network function, a request for the uplink packet flow in response to the condition being satisfied (see figure 2, step 208; see paragraph 32; at block 208, the RAN can determine a modification for the coding scheme associated with the user device. In particular, the RAN can determine whether the threshold is satisfied by the device temperature, the device power consumption, the one or more processor speeds, or the one or more other device metrics. In some embodiments, the RAN can determine that the coding scheme is to be modified to reduce the transmission of data via the data connection associated with the user device. In some additional embodiments, the RAN can report the one or more device metrics to another network node associated with the network; see paragraph 37; the RAN can further comprise the stored information, access the stored information via a database, and/or request the one or more potential coding schemes from the network; see paragraph 70; the 5G RAN 106 can transmit a modification request to the network 506 and receive a modification response from the network 506. In some embodiments, the modification request and response are transmitted to a database that includes information regarding potential modifications for the coding scheme and/or potential alternative coding schemes for the data connection) and wherein the condition comprises that the number of the one or more signals is greater than a threshold ((see figure 2 steps 206; see figure 3 steps 306 and paragraph 43; the RAN can additionally determine that the device metric (e.g., device temperature, device power consumption, etc.) exceed the threshold)). Shahid and Kim both data session support with respect to interactions between network core, the base station and the UE. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present application to incorporate the power level determination as taught by Shahid into the teachings of Kim. The motivation to do so would be to prevent service disruptions and improve transmission quality by determining if the transmission power used will cause service disruption and if so changing the transmission parameters. Relevant Prior Art Prior art Park et al. (US Publication 2020/0037386 A1) teaches, in figure 17, a registration procedure for UE, where a new AMF is determined first. Prior art Dinan et al. (US Publication 2018/0324663 A1) teaches, first base station may determine whether reference signal received power (RSRP) and/or reference signal received quality (RSRQ) of a target cell satisfies or exceeds one or more threshold values. If RSRP and/or RSRQ of the target cell does not satisfy or exceed one or more threshold values, the target cell may not be a suitable candidate as a target cell for the requested one or more network slices for the wireless device (see figure 18 and paragraph 251). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY P PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-3086. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-8786. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY P PATEL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683752
METHOD FOR RECEIVING BANDWIDTH PART COMBINATION AND METHOD FOR SENDING BANDWIDTH PART COMBINATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12659087
TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS AND METHODS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659832
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION METHOD AND APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659185
CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652205
ADAPTIVE PEAK TO AVERAGE POWER RATIO PAPR SUPPRESSION APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 8m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 936 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month