Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/746,791

NANOMATERIALS COMPRISING TETRAVALENT LIPID COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 18, 2024
Priority
Dec 20, 2021 — provisional 63/291,593 +2 more
Examiner
BAEK, BONG-SOOK
Art Unit
1611
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
383 granted / 919 resolved
-18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +70% interview lift
Without
With
+69.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
967
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 919 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims Claims 1-2, 7, 22, 33, 40-41, 43-47, 53, 55, 58-59, and 64-65 are pending. Election/Restrictions Applicants’ election of Group I and the following species: PNG media_image1.png 134 491 media_image1.png Greyscale (Example 7-53), in the reply filed on 6/24/2026 is acknowledged. The election was made without traverse. Applicant stated that claims 1-2, 7, 22, 33, 40, 43-47, 53, and 64-65 read on the elected compound. However, it is noted that claim 33 is not readable because X1 is not -O- or -NR- in the elected species. Accordingly, claims 33, 41, 55, and 58-59 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claims 1-2, 7, 22, 40, 43-47, 53, and 64-65 are under examination in the instant office action. The elected compound is free of prior art, thus search and examination are extended to the following scope of compounds defined by the formula(I): the compound of formula (I-A), PNG media_image2.png 183 279 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein, L2, L2’, and L2” are absent, L3, L3’, and L3” are absent, R1, R1’, and R1” are saturated straight or branched C1-20 hydrocarbon chain, X1 is absent, X2 is C1-6 hydrocarbon chain wherein one methylene unit is optionally replaced with -NR and R is alkyl; and X3 is hydrogen. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 43 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 43 refers to “Table 1” in the specification. Here the Table 1 contains about 50 compounds and as such can easily be written out and there is no need for “Table 1” in the claim. The claim is not complete in itself. Where possible, claims are to be complete in themselves. Incorporation by reference to a specific figure or table “is permitted only in exceptional circumstances where there is no practical way to define the invention in words and where it is more concise to incorporate by reference than duplicating a drawing or table into the claim. Incorporation by reference is a necessity doctrine, not for applicant’s convenience.” Ex parteFressola, 27 USPQ2d 1608, 1609 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1993) (citations omitted). See MPEP 2173.05(s). Claim 45 recites “a conjugate-linker lipid (e.g., polyethylene glycol lipid)”. The recitation of a feature in parenthesis renders a claim indefinite by raising a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by the parenthesis is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). For examination purpose, the feature introduced by the parenthesis is considered as not required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7, 22, 44-47, and 53 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by WO 2020032184 (hereafter, Matsumoto; its national stage application US 20220098142 cited as English equivalent). Matsumoto teaches cationic lipid (ionizable lipid) of the following formula (I): PNG media_image3.png 242 311 media_image3.png Greyscale , wherein L is -C(O)O- (abstract and claim 1). The compound of formula (I) encompasses the claimed formula (I-A). Also, Matsumoto specifically discloses the following compound: PNG media_image4.png 718 802 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 606 761 media_image5.png Greyscale (p27, Table 1, compound 1 and compound 2, and claims 2-6). The compound is a speices of the claimed formula (I) wherein, L1, L1’, and L1” are -C(O)-, L2, L2’, and L2” are absent, L3, L3’, and L3” are absent, R1, R1’, and R1” are optionally saturated straight or branched C1-20 hydrocarbon chain, X1 is absent, X2 is C4-5 hydrocarbon chain wherein one methylene unit is replaced with -NR and R is methyl (C1 alkyl); and X3 is hydrogen. Also, Matsumoto discloses that the cationic lipid may form a complex with a plurality of molecules in a solvent or a dispersion medium and the complex may contain other lipid components and nucleic acids (therapeutic agent) wherein the other lipid components include sterols (e.g., cholesterol, cholesterol ester, and cholesteryl hemisuccinate), phospholipid, and polyethylene glycol lipids (PEG lipids) such as GS-020 ([0083]-[0087]). Matsumoto teaches that the compound is used for producing the lipid particle and disclose a composition comprising the lipid particle and a nucleic acid (particularly, a nucleic acid which is a substance useful for a pharmaceutical application or an application for a research purpose) ([0090]). Matsumoto specifically disclose siRNA (nucleic acid) encapsulated lipid nanoparticle comprising the cationic lipid, DPPC (phospholipid), cholesterol (sterol), and GS-020 (PEG lipid) (Examples 1-2). In addition, Matsumoto teaches that the composition as a medicament can be produced by a method known in the field of pharmaceutical formulation techniques using a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier (excipient) ([0109]). As such, the instant claims are anticipated by Matsumoto. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 40 and 64-65 are objected to as being dependent from a rejected base claim (claim 1), but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form to the extent of the scope of the elected invention, including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following scope of compounds defined by formula (I-A) appears to be free of prior art: PNG media_image2.png 183 279 media_image2.png Greyscale wherein, L2 is absent; L2’ and L2” are an optionally substituted saturated or unsaturated, straight or branched C1-12 hydrocarbon chain; L3 is absent; L3’ and L3” are -C(O)O-; R1 is –(CH2)p-CyB wherein CyB is 1-adamantyl or 2-adamantyl and p is 1, 2, or 3; R1’ and R1” are an optionally substituted saturated or unsaturated, straight or branched C1-20 hydrocarbon chain; X1 is absent; and X2 -X3 is PNG media_image6.png 78 149 media_image6.png Greyscale . Relevant Prior Art US 2017/0197903, US 20210052646, US 20220273566. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BONG-SOOK BAEK whose telephone number is 571-270-5863. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM-6:00PM Monday-Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bethany Barham can be reached on 571-272-6175. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /BONG-SOOK BAEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697312
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF EYELID PTOSIS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692221
5-METHOXYMETHYL AND 5-HYDROXYMETHYL PHENETHYLAMINES
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12653820
HYDROMORPHONE FORMULATIONS FOR MULTI-DOSE PRODUCTS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12636315
METHOD FOR TREATING PERIODONTAL DISEASE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12611394
USE OF GINKGOLIDE A IN THE TREATMENT OF AUTISM
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+69.8%)
3y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 919 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month