Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/747,544

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING UPLINK TRANSMISSION TIMING FOR SRS TRANSMISSION IN ONE OR MORE CELLS IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 18, 2023 — RE 1020230092969
Examiner
LEE, CHI HO A
Art Unit
4100
Tech Center
4100
Assignee
Soenghun KIM
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1269 granted / 1378 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1378 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2 and 4-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MONOLAKOS et al PG PUB 2026/0163699 in view of YUAN et al PG PUB 2026/0067840. Re Claims 1, 13, MONOLAKOS et al teaches a UE (a transceiver, memory, and controller) receiving in a first cell a set of positioning SRS configuration with IEs (RRC message) for positioning SRS in RRC inactive state [0169] wherein the IEs (fields) includes a validity area (a positioning area), positioning SRS configuration ID and Area-ID-cell list indicating a one or more cells where the positioning SRS configuration is valid [0182 0184]; the UE performing transitioning to RRC inactive state and cell reselection to a second cell [0184 0208]; the UE further receiving an SRS activation message that includes SRS information RSRP threshold [0174]; by comparing the RSRP threshold of downlink pathloss with a RSRP of downlink pathloss (a stored RSRP) of the second cell indicates whether the positioning SRS area satisfies the RSRP threshold to ascertain whether the positioning SRS area needs updating [0190]. MONOLAKOS et al fails to explicitly teach “a first timing advance based on a downlink timing difference; and performing by the terminal a positioning SRS transmission in the second cell based on: the first timing advance and a positioning SRS configuration,”. However, YUAN et al teaches in figure 4, obtaining a first TA based on a downlink timing difference [0110] and figure 3, S302 teaches the terminal device sending and SRS based on the first TA [0134], S303 teaches the terminal device receiving a TA adjustment command to select/use a beam/area associated with the SRS. By combining the teachings, TA determination in MONOLAKOS et al can be modified to include the TA adjustment in YUAN et al determine whether the positioning SRS area requires updating. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to have determined “the updating, the second to a positively SRS area” based on the TA adjustment in YUAN to ascertain whether the positioning SRS configuration is valid. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled to have combined the teachings Re Claim 2, YUAN teaches in figure 3, receiving the TA adjustment (the second timing advance) from the second cell indicating a uplink transmission time for the SRS transmission [0315] wherein the TA adjustment can be send via SIB. Re Claims 4, 7, 8, YUAN et al teaches the timing difference is determined based on downlink frame boundary of the second and downlink frame boundary of the first cell (the previous cell) [See figure 4] wherein the positioning SRS configuration comprised in the RRC message in the first cell [0169]. Re Claim 5, MONOLAKOS et al teaches the UE receiving the RSRP threshold (a specific threshold) [0164] for the increase/decrease of RSRP for time alignment validation wherein when the difference between the stored RSRP of downlink pathloss reference and current RSRP of downlink pathloss reference is above the threshold, the positioning SRS transmission is stopped [0190: conditional transmission of SRS]. Re Claims 6, 9, MONOLAKOS et al teaches the IE includes “inactivePosSRS-RSRP-changeThreshold” parameter in RRC inactive state [0164], SRS power and PL pathloss estimate [0162]. Re Claim 10, MONOLAKOS et al teaches PL indicates the SSB information or index [0168]. Re Claims 11, 12, MONOLAKOS et al teaches the positioning SRS transmission is performed, Area-ID-cell list (positioning SRS area) indicating a one or more cells where the positioning SRS configuration is determined [0182 0184] with transmission power for the positioning SRS resource set [0162]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Re Claim 3, prior art fails to teach the amount of time advice is determined as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-3130. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KASSIM KHALAD can be reached at 5712703770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706726
RATE MATCHING FOR CHANNEL AWARE TONE RESERVATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701563
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING SCRAMBLING CODE RESOURCE, AND TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690019
TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATOR STATES FOR DIFFERENT OPERATING STATES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12690054
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684618
TERMINAL
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1378 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month