Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/748,060

Increasing Tortuosity To Decrease Heat Transfer In Hollow Structures By Shaping The Hollow Structures, A Process That Entails Distribution Of Forces During Transformation Of Seeds

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2023 — provisional 63/525,143
Examiner
DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S
Art Unit
1741
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Plassein Technologies Ltd. LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
528 granted / 852 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
83.6%
+43.6% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 852 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lynch (2022/0185683). Lynch teaches a method for manufacturing an insulating board, the method comprising providing a tray 608 having a bottom surface and plurality of side walls 606, placing on the bottom surface of the tray a plurality of seeds in a first layer, placing a plurality of seeds in a second layer on top of the first layer, a center of each seed in the second layer being horizontally offset from a center of each seed of the first layer, placing a plurality of seeds in a third layer on top of the second layer, a center of each seed in the third layer being horizontally offset from a center of each seed of the first layer and the second layer, and heating the tray to transform the seeds into a plurality of hollow structures in the positioned in which they were laid (figure 6, [0159]-[0160]). Lynch doesn’t specify printing of the seeds in this embodiment. However, Lynch teaches the seeds can be produced by 3-dimensional printing. More specifically, Lynch teaches applying a lower coating over a tray bottom or belt, applying a plurality of cores over the lower coating, and applying an upper coating over the cores and lower coating ([0141], [0142]). Lynch also teaches multiple layers of seeds can be produced by a similar method of applying a lower coating over a tray bottom, applying a plurality of cores over the lower coating, and applying an upper coating over the cores and lower coating, and repeated to form more layers ([0153]). Lynch teaches the 3-dimensional printing method is used to produce seeds that are subsequently used in the embodiment shown in figure 6, as discussed earlier. However, in light of the different embodiments for producing seeds taught by Lynch, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have combined known steps of 3-D printing of the layers of seeds directly into the tray 608 in the embodiment of figure 6, wherein the layers of seeds are 3-D printed by layering of the lower coating, the cores, and the upper coating, repeatedly to form a plurality of layers, and heating of filled tray with the plurality of layers of seeds to transform the seeds in the seeds in the positioned in which they were printed, as it would provide a more efficient process than producing the seeds, collecting them, and then filling the tray with the seeds. Naturally in combining the known techniques, the printing of said plurality of seeds of said first layer would include applying a lower coating over said tray bottom, applying a plurality of cores over said lower coating, and applying an upper coating over said cores and said lower coating, the printing of said plurality of seeds of said second layer would include applying a second lower coating over upper coating of said first layer, applying a second plurality of cores over said second lower coating, and applying a second upper coating over said second plurality of cores and said second lower coating, the printing of said plurality of seeds of said third layer would include applying a third lower coating over said second upper coating, applying a third plurality of cores over said third lower coating, and applying a third upper coating over said third plurality of cores and said third lower coating, and the step of heating said tray to transform said seeds of said first, second, and third layers into said plurality of hollow structures includes transforming said seeds in the position in which they are printed. Response to Arguments Applicant did not provide any substantial argument in their response filed April 29, 2026. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUEENIE S DEHGHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8209. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Hindenlang can be reached at 571-270-7001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUEENIE S DEHGHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662418
ANNULAR GLASS PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING GLASS SUBSTRATE FOR MAGNETIC DISK, GLASS SUBSTRATE FOR MAGNETIC DISK, AND MAGNETIC DISK
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12643809
GLASS PRODUCT FORMING MOLD
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637380
MOLTEN GLASS TRANSPORTER, TRANSPORT CUP, ENDCAP, AND METHODS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630459
CLEANING STEP TO REMOVE METALS OR METAL OXIDES FROM POROUS GLASS BODY
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623951
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN OPTICAL FIBER AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM THEREFOR
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 5m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 852 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month