Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/748,509

Solar Cable Support Bracket

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Mar 22, 2024 — provisional 63/568,808
Examiner
SMITH, NKEISHA
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
HellermannTyton Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
1004 granted / 1382 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1407
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1382 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following correspondence is a Final Office Action for application no. 18/748,509, for a SOLAR CABLE SUPPORT BRACKET, filed on 6/20/2024. This correspondence is in response to applicant's reply filed on 1/14/2026. Claims 1-9 and 11-21 are pending. Claims 3, 4 and 7 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 16 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Labeirie et al. (U.S. Pat. 6,994,300). Regarding claim 1, Labeirie teaches a support bracket (see figure below) configured to receive an edge of a workpiece (3, Fig. 3) and support an elongated object (tubes, sheaths, cables) relative to the workpiece, the support bracket comprising: a first hanger portion configured to support the edge of the workpiece and limit a rotation of the support bracket on the edge of the workpiece; a clip portion (members 8, 18, 19, 21 operate as the clip portion) configured to fasten over the edge of the workpiece, the clip portion including a first connector (21) configured to engage at least one of a first web face or a second web face of the workpiece, the clip portion spaced apart from the first hanger portion; a cable tie retainer defining an aperture configured to receive a cable tie therethrough, the cable tie retainer configured to receive the cable tie to attach the elongated object to the support bracket; and an object support section (see cradle portion 11 below) configured to support the elongated object. [AltContent: textbox (Cross brace)] [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Object support section)] PNG media_image1.png 462 494 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (1st cradle arm)] [AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (Cable tie)][AltContent: textbox (1st connector)] [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (rib)][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (1st hanger portion)] [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (2nd cradle arm)][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (2nd clip arm)][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (Clip portion)][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: textbox (1st end wall)] [AltContent: textbox (gap)][AltContent: textbox (1st clip arm)] [AltContent: textbox (Cable tie retainer)] Regarding claim 2, Labeirie teaches the bracket of claim 1, wherein the clip portion further comprises: a first clip arm; a second clip arm (see Fig. 3) arranged opposite the first clip arm; and a first end wall interconnecting the first and second clip arms, wherein the first and second clip arms define a gap therebetween that is configured to receive the edge of the workpiece through an opening opposite the first end wall. Regarding claim 6, Labeirie teaches a support bracket of claim 1, wherein the support bracket includes at least one rib configured to bend a loose cable tie inserted through a cable tie retainer to retain the cable tie on the support bracket. Regarding claim 8, Labeirie teaches a support bracket of claim 1, wherein the object support section further comprises: a cross brace; a first cradle arm; and a second cradle arm, wherein the first and second cradle arms are spaced apart and define a cradle therebetween. Regarding claim 13, Labeirie teaches the bracket of claim 1, further comprising: a second hanger portion configured to hang over the edge of the workpiece, the second hanger portion spaced apart from the first hanger portion (see Fig. 3). Regarding claim 16, Labeirie teaches the bracket of claim 13, wherein the cable tie retainer is defined on at least one of the clip portion, the first hanger portion, or the second hanger portion. Regarding claim 21, Labeirie teaches a support bracket (see figure above) configured to receive an edge of a workpiece (3) and support an elongated object relative to the workpiece, the support bracket comprising: a first hanger portion configured to support the edge of the workpiece at a first location and limit a rotation of the support bracket on the edge of the workpiece; a clip portion (members 8, 18, 19, 21 operate as the clip portion) configured to fasten over the edge of the workpiece at a second location, the clip portion including a first connector configured to engage at least one of a first web face or a second web face of the workpiece, the first location and the second location are different locations on the edge of the workpiece; a cable tie retainer defining an aperture configured to receive a cable tie therethrough, the cable tie retainer configured to receive the cable tie to attach the elongated object to the support bracket; and an object support section (cradle, 11) configured to support the elongated object. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 9, 11, 12, 14-15 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 18-20 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 16 and 21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NKEISHA J. SMITH whose telephone number is (571)272-5781. The examiner can normally be reached Normal hours: M/Th 7-4; T 9-5; W 7-3; F 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NKEISHA SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632 April 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12648637
Adjustable Floating Shelf
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12635833
Dual Towel Hook with Secure Retention of a Hanging Article
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631019
SPLICE APPARATUS FOR JOINING TOGETHER ADJACENT WALL BRACKETS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628930
TELESCOPIC SUPPORT AND HAIR DRYER DEVICE USING SAME
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622519
STABILIZER SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING TIPPING OF FURNITURE
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1382 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month