Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/748,698

MODULAR TRUSS HANGER SYSTEM AND METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Examiner
MAESTRI, PATRICK J
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tremco CPG Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
772 granted / 1057 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1090
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1057 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Foley (US Patent No 8,209,925). Referring to claim 1: Foley teaches a modular construction assembly, comprising: a truss hanger (item 14) configured to support a truss structure; and an embed plate (item 12) including one or more studs (item 38), the embed plate configured for mounting to a predetermined position over a wall structure (item 70) and configured to engage the truss hanger to maintain the truss hanger in a fixed position relative to the wall structure (figure 4). Foley does not specifically teach wherein the embed plate shifts load associated with the truss structure from a face of the wall structure to the embedded studs of the embed plate. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to recognize that the structure of Foley would function to shift the truss load into the wall structure through the studs embedded in concrete as taught by the final product of Foley. Referring to claim 2: Foley teaches all the limitations of claim 1 as noted above. Additionally, Foley teaches the embed plate engages a form configured to receive concrete (col 3, lines 50-53). Referring to claim 3: Foley teaches all the limitations of claim 2 as noted above. Additionally, Foley teaches the form comprises a rebar cage (item 72). Foley does not specifically teach stirrups. However, the Examiner gives Official Notice that it is known in the art to include stirrups when creating a rebar cage within a wall or column. Referring to claim 4: Foley teaches all the limitations of claim 1 as noted above. Additionally, Foley teaches wherein the embed plate includes a base plate (item 26) and the one or more studs (item 38) extend from the base plate and are configured for shear connection in concrete (figure 4). Referring to claim 5: Foley teaches all the limitations of claim 1 as noted above. Additionally, Foley teaches wherein the embed plate is configured to receive concrete over the one or more studs along a first side of the embed plate to anchor the embed plate in the predetermined position along the wall structure, and the truss hanger is mounted to a second side of the embed plate opposite the first side (col 3, lines 50-53 and figure 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK J MAESTRI whose telephone number is (571)270-7859. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at 571-270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK J MAESTRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590453
CONCEALED STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590456
MODULAR BUILDING BLOCKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577792
SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR RAISED FLOORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559941
Profiled metallic sheet for a sandwich panel
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559932
JOIST HANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1057 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month