Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/749,347

HANDHELD TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Jul 07, 2023 — provisional 63/512,362
Examiner
RODDEN, JOSHUA E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Allway Tools Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
635 granted / 1083 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+51.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1108
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1083 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 6,386,500 (Dainoff et al.). Regarding Claim 1, Dainoff et al. teaches: Claim 1 - a handheld device, comprising: a base (12) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; and at least one attachment mechanism (14, 16) that is configured to be releasably fixed to the base (12) and house an item (such as book (52)), (Figures 1-13). Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Design Patent No. D583,144 (Vejnar). Regarding Claims 1, 2, 3, and 9, Vejnar teaches: Claim 1 - a handheld device, comprising: a base (AA) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; and at least one attachment mechanism (BB, CC, DD, EE) that is configured to be releasably fixed to the base (AA) and house an item (such as seen in Figures 13-15), (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 Below); Claim 2 - wherein the at least one attachment mechanism (BB, CC, DD, EE) includes at least one of a first attachment mechanism (BB), a second attachment mechanism (CC), a third attachment mechanism (DD), and a fourth attachment mechanism (EE), (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 Below); Claim 3 - wherein the at least one attachment mechanism (BB) includes a recess that extends over one of the sidewalls and a fastener (FF) that is configured to extend through the recess and releasable fix the at least one attachment mechanism (BB) to the base (AA), (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 Below); Claim 9 - wherein the at least one attachment mechanism (BB) is configured to at least one of extend over and be fixed to one of the sidewalls, (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 Below). PNG media_image1.png 605 540 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 10, Vejnar teaches: Claim 10 - a kit, comprising: a handheld tool including a base (AA) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface that is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; and a plurality of attachment mechanisms (BB, CC, DD, EE) that are each configured to be releasably fixed to the base (AA) and house an item (such as seen in Figures 13-15), (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 above). Regarding Claim 11, Vejnar teaches: Claim 11 - a method of assembling and using a handheld tool, comprising: providing a handheld tool comprising a base (AA) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and that is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; providing at least one attachment mechanism (BB, CC, DD, EE); fixing the at least one attachment mechanism (BB, CC, DD, EE) to the base (AA) of the handheld tool; and arranging an item (such as seen in Figures 13-15) to be housed within or in contact with the at least one attachment mechanism (BB, CC, DD, EE), (Figures 1-24 and Annotated Figure 19 above). Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 8 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0305603 (Davis). Regarding Claims 1, 2, 4, 8 and 9, Davis teaches: Claim 1 - a handheld device (10 – the device is certainly “capable of” being moved by hand), comprising: a base (16) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; and at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44) that is configured to be releasably fixed to the base (16) and house an item, (Figures 1-5D); Claim 2 - wherein the at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44) includes at least one of a first attachment mechanism (anyone of 38, 40, 42, or 44), a second attachment mechanism (any other one of 38, 40, 42, or 44), a third attachment mechanism (any other one of 38, 40, 42, or 44), and a fourth attachment mechanism (any other one of 38, 40, 42, or 44), (Figures 1-5D); Claim 4 - wherein the first attachment mechanism (44) includes a housing that includes a base (AA), a first arm (BB) extending from the base (AA) and a second arm (CC) that is spaced from the first arm (BB), the first arm and the second arm (CC) together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween, (Figures 1-5D and Annotated Figure 3 Below); Claim 8 - wherein the third attachment mechanism (44) includes a main body (AA) that includes a first arm (BB) and a second arm (CC) that is spaced from the first arm (BB), extending from a distal end of the first arm (BB) is a first flange (DD) that delimits the first arm (BB) and extending from a distal end of the second arm (CC) is a second flange (DD) that delimits the second arm (CC), the first arm (BB) and the second arm (CC) together are configured to house the tool, (Figures 1-5d and Annotated Figure 3 Below); Claim 9 - wherein the at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44) is configured to at least one of extend over and be fixed to one of the sidewalls, (Figures 1-5D). PNG media_image2.png 526 762 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 10, Davis teaches: Claim 10 - a kit, comprising: a handheld tool including a base (16) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface that is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; and a plurality of attachment mechanisms (38, 40, 42, or 44) that are each configured to be releasably fixed to the base (16) and house an item, (Figures 1-5D). Regarding Claim 11, Davis teaches: Claim 11 - a method of assembling and using a handheld tool, comprising: providing a handheld tool comprising a base (16) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and that is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; providing at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44); fixing the at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44) to the base (16) of the handheld tool; and arranging an item to be housed within or in contact with the at least one attachment mechanism (38, 40, 42, or 44), (Figures 1-5D and Annotated Figure 19 above). Claim(s) 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,186,507 (Neidfeld). Regarding Claim 11, Neidfeld teaches: Claim 11 - a method of assembling and using a handheld tool, comprising: providing a handheld tool comprising a base (12) that has a linearly extending top surface and a linearly extending bottom surface and that is delimited by a plurality of sidewalls; providing at least one attachment mechanism (16, 18 or 20); fixing the at least one attachment mechanism (16, 18 or 20) to the base (12) of the handheld tool; and arranging an item (26, 28, 30) to be housed within or in contact with the at least one attachment mechanism (16, 18 or 20), (Figures 1-7A). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0305603 (Davis) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,477,744 (Miles). Regarding Claims 4 and 5, Davis teaches the handheld device as described above, in addition to Davis teaching: Claim 4 - wherein the first attachment mechanism (anyone of 38, 40, 42, or 44) includes a housing that includes a base (34), (Figures 1-5D and Annotated Figure 3 Above). Davis does not teach: a first arm extending from the base and a second arm that is spaced from the first arm, the first arm and the second arm together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween, wherein the first arm and the second arm of the first attachment mechanism are elastically deformable (Claims 4 and 5). However, Miles teaches: Claims 4 and 5 - a first arm (46) extending from a base (18) and a second arm (50) that is spaced from the first arm (46), the first arm (46) and the second arm (50) together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween, wherein the first arm (46) and the second arm (50) are elastically deformable, (Figures 1-3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the handheld device of Davis to a first arm extending from the base and a second arm that is spaced from the first arm, the first arm and the second arm together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween, wherein the first arm and the second arm of the first attachment mechanism are elastically deformable (Claims 4 and 5) as taught by Miles for the purposes of being able to securely grip a tool with a shaft such as a brush. Claim(s) 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0305603 (Davis) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,932,312 (Chen). Regarding Claims 6 and 7, Davis teaches the handheld device as described above, in addition to Davis teaching: Claim 6 – wherein the second attachment mechanism (anyone of 38, 40, 42, or 44) includes a first component that has a base (34), (Figures 1-5D and Annotated Figure 3 Above); Claim 7 - wherein the base (34) includes a recess (between spring arms of element (34)) that extends one of vertically within the base toward the second component or horizontally within the base (34), (Figures 1-5D and Annotated Figure 3 Above). Davis does not teach: wherein the base includes a first sidewall extending from one end of the base and a second sidewall extending from an opposite end of the base, and a second component that includes a first arm and a second arm, which are arranged adjacent to each other and independently rotatably fixed to the first component at the first sidewall and the second sidewall, respectively, and the first arm and the second arm together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween (Claim 6). However, Chen teaches: Claim 6 – a base (11) which includes a first sidewall (17a) extending from one end of the base (11) and a second sidewall (17b) extending from an opposite end of the base (11), and a second component that includes a first arm (22) and a second arm (22), which are arranged adjacent to each other and independently rotatably fixed to the first component at the first sidewall (17a) and the second sidewall (17b), respectively, and the first arm (22) and the second arm (22) together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween, (Figures 1-6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the handheld device of Davis to have wherein the base includes a first sidewall extending from one end of the base and a second sidewall extending from an opposite end of the base, and a second component that includes a first arm and a second arm, which are arranged adjacent to each other and independently rotatably fixed to the first component at the first sidewall and the second sidewall, respectively, and the first arm and the second arm together configured to receive and releasably fix the tool therebetween (Claim 6) as taught by Chen for the purposes of being able to securely grip a tool with a shaft such as a brush. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Josh Rodden whose telephone number is (303) 297-4258. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 8-5 MST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Michener can be reached on (571) 271467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA E RODDEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698746
TRAVELING FINGER LOCK FOR AN ACTUATOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691643
JOINTS FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATED PANELS AND BEAMS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685390
STORAGE RACK WITH EMBEDDED DISPLAY FOR BARRELS OR CASKS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686492
Aircraft With Transonic Rotor
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679079
SPACE DEBRIS CAPTURE APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR IMPLENTING THE SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+51.2%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1083 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month