Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/749,368

DISPLAY DEVICE, EXTERNAL DEVICE, AND AUDIO PLAYING AND SOUND EFFECT PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Examiner
WOO, STELLA L
Art Unit
2693
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hisense Visual Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
801 granted / 1007 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1028
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1007 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 8, 11-15, 18-20 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 6-7, 9-10, 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kraegeloh et al. (US 2021/0243491 A1, “Kraegeloh”) in view of Yu et al. (US 2023/0297324 A1, “Yu”). As to claims 1, 16, Kraegeloh discloses a display apparatus, comprising: a display configured to display an image and/or a user interface (sink device may be a TV set, para. 0009); one or more external device interfaces, configured to connect with one or more external devices (digital media interfaces include HDMI, HDMI ARC and S/PDIF links, para. 0008-0010, 0030); one or more processors (processing means, para. 0551, 0559) in connection with the display and the one or more external device interfaces, and configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: obtain a control instruction for outputting an audio signal (mode instruction selects playback mode, para. 0020-0021, 0049, 0412, 0485, and latency value, para. 0475); in response to the control instruction, detect a current audio output mode of the display apparatus, wherein the audio output mode comprises a normal mode and/or a low-latency mode (audio mode may be a standard audio mode or a low latency audio mode, para. 0049, 0053, 0055); receive audio data from a first external device in connection with the display apparatus; wherein a data format of the audio data is determined according to the audio output mode (playback of audio/video content sends an audio and video stream from a source device to a sink device, para. 0008-0009, 0020; low latency playback mode uses a first input data format, para. 0063); based on that the audio output mode is the low-latency mode, perform a first type of sound effect processing on the audio data; and based on that the audio output mode is the normal mode, perform a second type of sound effect processing on the audio data; wherein processing time of the second type of sound effect processing is greater than processing time of the first type of sound effect processing. Kraegeloh differs from claims 1, 16 in that it does not teach the above underlined limitations. Yu teaches processing audio data in a low-latency mode which requires a particular processing time based on a first duration, processing audio in a non-low-latency mode based on a second duration, where the second duration is greater than the first duration (para. 0020-0022), and including sound effect processing (para. 0008-0009, 0503, 0522). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kraegeloh with the above teaching of Yu in order to flexibly play and control audio data of a source terminal by one or more other terminals, as taught by Yu (para. 0004). As to claims 2, 17, Kraegeloh in view of Yu teaches: wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: obtain a sound low-latency switch state, wherein the sound low-latency switch state comprises one of an on-state, an off-state, or an automatic state (Kraegeloh: sink device reports a latency playback mode, para. 0063); based on that the sound low-latency switch state is the on-state, mark the audio output mode as the low-latency mode (Kraegeloh: low-latency playback mode, para. 0063, 0073); based on that the sound low-latency switch state is the off-state, mark the audio output mode as the normal mode (Kraegeloh: legacy audio mode, para. 0066, 0073); based on that the sound low-latency switch state is the automatic state, obtain a status of an image low-latency switch in the display apparatus, and set the current audio output mode according to the status of the image low-latency switch (Kraegeloh: latency mode is set based on source latency information, para. 0053, 0055, 0063). As to claim 6, Kraegeloh in view of Yu teaches: wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: obtain a set of basic processing items currently supported by the display apparatus, wherein a sound effect processing item in the set of basic processing items is a sound effect processing item of the first type of sound effect processing (Yu: audio capability of a slave device may include a sound effect parameter, para. 0010-0011); parse the audio data to obtain a current format version of the audio data (Yu: parse the feature information in the audio data, para. 0126); filter out an essential sound effect processing item of the current format version from the set of basic processing items (Yu: required sound effect, para. 0547); and call a sound effect processing algorithm corresponding to the essential sound effect processing item, to perform sound effect processing on the audio data by using the sound effect processing algorithm corresponding to the essential sound effect processing item (Yu: sound effect processing algorithm, para. 0008, 0260, 0539). As to claim 7, Kraegeloh in view of Yu teaches: wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: obtain the content source information sent from a third external device, after obtaining the set of basic processing items currently supported by the display apparatus (Yu: audio capability parameter of a device, para. 0042) ; read a current content source type of the third external device from the content source information (Yu: audio play policy content of received audio data, para. 0028); filter out an unessential sound effect processing item from the set of basic processing items according to the current content source type (Yu: it is determined that sound effect adding does not need to be performed, para. 0042); and disable a sound effect processing algorithm corresponding to the unessential sound effect processing item (Yu: audio is played without sound effect adding, para. 0042). As to claim 9, Kraegeloh in view of Yu teaches: wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: decode the audio data to obtain an audio signal (Yu: audio is decoded, para. 0209); call a basic sound effect processing algorithm, and adjust the audio signal according to the basic sound effect processing algorithm (Yu: sound effect algorithm, para. 0260); and play the adjusted audio signal (Yu: second device plays the audio data, para. 0042, 0465). As to claim 10, Kraegeloh in view of Yu teaches: wherein the one or more processors are further configured to execute instructions to cause the display apparatus to: send a connection request to a fourth external device to establish an audio input channel (Kraegeloh: TV set wirelessly connects with a loudspeaker, para. 0011, 0013); and based on that the audio output mode is the low-latency mode, receive the first audio data sent from the fourth external device through the audio input channel, and play the first audio data (Kraegeloh: audio latency is applied to audio sent to loudspeaker, para. 0063). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yang et al. (US 2021/0360235 A1) teach a low-delay flag. Young (US 10,705,793 B1) teach low latency mode between wireless devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Stella L Woo whose telephone number is (571)272-7512. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached at 571-272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STELLA L. WOO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2693 /Stella L. Woo/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693 68
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602416
HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR SEMI-AUTOMATIC PATENT CLAIMS ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587613
System and method for documenting and controlling meetings with labels and automated operations
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585681
Methods for Converting Electronic Presentations Into Autonomous Information Collection and Feedback Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581038
AUDIO PROCESSING IN VIDEO CONFERENCING SYSTEM USING MULTIMODAL FEATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568170
PRIORITIZING EMERGENCY CALLS BASED ON CALLER RESPONSE TO AUTOMATED QUERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1007 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month