Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/750,293

STEERING CONTROL DEVICE AND STEERING CONTROL METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 21, 2024
Priority
Jun 27, 2023 — JP 2023-105309
Examiner
MORALES, OMAR
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
3 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
308 granted / 514 resolved
-10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
555
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to Applicants’ amendment received on July 24, 2026. Claims 1-6 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kakimoto et al. (US PG Pub No. 2021/0394821 A1), hereinafter “Kakimoto”. Regarding claim 1, Kakimoto discloses a steering control device that is applied to a vehicle steering system (Abstract) having a structure in which a dynamic power transmission path between a steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) and a turning unit (Fig. 1 (30)) is mechanically separated, the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) being configured to be steered by a steering wheel (Fig. 1 (11)) of the vehicle, the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) including a steering shaft (Fig. 1 (21)) coupled to the steering wheel (Fig. 1 (11)) of the vehicle, a reaction force motor (Fig. 1 (22)) configured to give a motor torque to the steering shaft (Fig. 1 (21)) so as to give a steering reaction force to the steering wheel (paragraph 10), a stopper mechanism configured to regulate a rotation of the steering shaft in a right-left direction within a regulatory rotation amount (paragraph 28), and an angle sensor configured to detect a rotation angle of the steering shaft (paragraphs 27 and 28) and the turning unit (Fig. 1 (30)) including a turning actuator (Fig. 1 (32)) configured to turn a turning wheel (Fig. (12)) of the vehicle, the steering control device comprising: a processor (Fig. 1 (36)) that controls the steering unit (paragraphs 21, 32), the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) using the reaction force motor (Fig. 1 (22)) as a drive source (paragraphs 25-28), the processor (Fig. 1 (36)) being configured to execute: an integrated rotation angle acquisition process of acquiring an integrated rotation angle based on a detection result of the angle sensor (paragraphs 46, 55, 81, 84, 94), the integrated rotation angle being an integrated value of the rotation angle of the steering shaft (paragraph 25-29); and an abnormality determination process of determining whether an abnormality condition is satisfied, based on the integrated rotation angle (Abstract; paragraphs 8-12), the abnormality condition being a condition for detecting an abnormality of the stopper mechanism (paragraphs 24-30), wherein the abnormality determination process includes a process of determining that the abnormality condition is satisfied, when the processor is capable of determining that the integrated rotation angle is out of the regulatory rotation amount (paragraphs 27-32). Regarding claim 6, Takashima discloses a method of controlling a vehicle steering system (Abstract) having a structure in which a dynamic power transmission path between a steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) and a turning unit (Fig. 1 (30)) is mechanically separated, the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) being configured to be steered by a steering wheel (Fig. 1 (11)) of the vehicle, the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) including a steering shaft (Fig. 1 (21)) coupled to the steering wheel (Fig. 1 (11)) of the vehicle, a reaction force motor (Fig. 1 (22)) configured to give a motor torque to the steering shaft (Fig. 1 (21)) so as to give a steering reaction force to the steering wheel (paragraph 10), a stopper mechanism configured to regulate a rotation of the steering shaft in a right-left direction within a regulatory rotation amount (paragraph 28), and an angle sensor configured to detect a rotation angle of the steering shaft (paragraphs 27 and 28), and the turning unit (Fig. 1 (30)) including a turning actuator (Fig. 1 (32)) configured to turn a turning wheel (Fig. (12)) of the vehicle, the method comprising: controlling the steering unit by a processor (paragraphs 21, 32), the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) using the reaction force motor (Fig. 1 (22)) as a drive source (paragraphs 25-28), the controlling of the steering unit (Fig. 1 (20)) by the processor (Fig. 1 (36)) including: acquiring an integrated rotation angle based on a detection result of the angle sensor configured to detect a rotation angle of the steering shaft (paragraphs 46, 55, 81, 84, 94), the integrated rotation angle being an integrated value of the rotation angle of the steering shaft (paragraph 25-29); and determining whether an abnormality condition is satisfied, based on the integrated rotation angle (Abstract; paragraphs 8-12), the abnormality condition being a condition for detecting an abnormality of the stopper mechanism configured to regulate a rotation of the steering shaft in a right-left direction within a regulatory rotation amount (paragraphs 24-30), the determining whether the abnormality condition is satisfied including determining that the abnormality condition is satisfied, when the processor is capable of determining that the integrated rotation angle is out of the regulatory rotation amount (paragraphs 27-32). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicants’ remarks filed on July 24, 2026 have been fully considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the current rejection. Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicants are reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-5923. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay Low can be reached on (571)272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /O.M/Examiner, Art Unit 3747 /LINDSAY M LOW/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Dec 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 24, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734896
METHOD FOR ACTUATING A FRICTION BRAKE DEVICE, CONTROL UNIT AND ELECTRICALLY DRIVABLE VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12715505
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715258
VEHICLE BEHAVIOR CONTROL APPARATUS, VEHICLE BEHAVIOR CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12681511
COOLER BYPASS MANIFOLD, METHOD FOR MODIFYING COOLER BYPASS MANIFOLD AND KIT FOR MODIFYING COOLER BYPASS MANIFOLD
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679160
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SUSPENSION ACCORDING TO STEERING MODE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+16.4%)
3y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month