Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/750,865

DECELERATION ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, DECELERATION ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 21, 2024
Examiner
ALHARBI, ADAM MOHAMED
Art Unit
3663
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
554 granted / 630 resolved
+35.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
663
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 06/21/2024. Claims 1-5 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to ATA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 15 1, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Pub. No. 20250083656 (hereinafter, "Ishii"). Regarding claim 1, Ishii discloses a deceleration assistance apparatus, comprising a control apparatus that executes deceleration control that decelerates a vehicle when a vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater (Fig. 4, #S105) than a target vehicle speed set as a target value of the vehicle speed of the vehicle when the vehicle travels on a curved road (“The reference braking force calculation unit 104 calculates reference braking force based on the current vehicle speed Vv and the target vehicle speed Vp. The reference braking force is calculated, in the vehicle control system, based on the external environment information ahead of the vehicle, and specified to successfully approach to and travel along (more specifically, achieve the target vehicle speed in approaching to and travelling along) the target travel locus such as a corner (curve) in the direction of travel of the vehicle” (para 0043)), wherein the control apparatus is configured to cause the target vehicle speed to be greater by a predetermined value (“the braking force calculation unit 107 includes the mechanism to increase or decrease the auxiliary braking force limit value as the maximum output value of the auxiliary braking force, in accordance with the current vehicle speed and the road surface μ information (presumed road surface μ)” (para 0116)) or is configured to not execute the deceleration control (“On determination of No in S103, the auxiliary braking force control device (braking control device) 11 proceeds to S108 to determine that the auxiliary braking force is not required (no need to execute the auxiliary braking force function)” (para 0064)) even when the vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater than the target vehicle speed when a predetermined condition in which a decrease of a deceleration speed of the vehicle is detected when the vehicle travels on the curved road is met ((Fig. 4, #S105 and #S108) and “the braking force calculation unit 107 calculates the physical speed limit based on the external environment information, such as the travel path curvature, acquired by the external recognition information acquisition unit 101” (para 0072)). Regarding claim 2, Ishii discloses the deceleration assistance apparatus according to claim 1. Additionally, Ishii discloses wherein the predetermined condition includes a condition in which the deceleration speed at a time point at which the decrease of the deceleration speed of the vehicle is detected is equal to or more than a predetermined deceleration speed (Fig. 7, #T1-T4 and “In the braking control, the determination above is similar to that in S201, but the given threshold may be used to vary timing for calculation and timing for output, initialize setting of each gradient, and others.” (para 0105)). Regarding claim 3, Ishii discloses the deceleration assistance apparatus according to claim 1. Additionally, Ishii discloses wherein the predetermined condition includes a condition in which the decrease of the deceleration speed of the vehicle is detected at a time point at which the vehicle enters the curved road (Fig. 4, #S103 and Fig. 7, #T1-T4). Regarding claim 4, Ishii discloses a deceleration assistance method that executes deceleration control that decelerates a vehicle when a vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater (Fig. 4, #S105) than a target vehicle speed set as a target value of the vehicle speed of the vehicle when the vehicle travels on a curved road (“The reference braking force calculation unit 104 calculates reference braking force based on the current vehicle speed Vv and the target vehicle speed Vp. The reference braking force is calculated, in the vehicle control system, based on the external environment information ahead of the vehicle, and specified to successfully approach to and travel along (more specifically, achieve the target vehicle speed in approaching to and travelling along) the target travel locus such as a corner (curve) in the direction of travel of the vehicle” (para 0043)), the deceleration assistance method comprising a step of causing the target vehicle speed to be greater by a predetermined value (“the braking force calculation unit 107 includes the mechanism to increase or decrease the auxiliary braking force limit value as the maximum output value of the auxiliary braking force, in accordance with the current vehicle speed and the road surface μ information (presumed road surface μ)” (para 0116)) or not executing the deceleration control (“On determination of No in S103, the auxiliary braking force control device (braking control device) 11 proceeds to S108 to determine that the auxiliary braking force is not required (no need to execute the auxiliary braking force function)” (para 0064)) even when the vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater than the target vehicle speed when a predetermined condition in which a decrease of a deceleration speed of the vehicle is detected when the vehicle travels on the curved road is met ((Fig. 4, #S105 and #S108) and “the braking force calculation unit 107 calculates the physical speed limit based on the external environment information, such as the travel path curvature, acquired by the external recognition information acquisition unit 101” (para 0072)). Regarding claim 5, Ishii discloses a non-transitory storage medium storing instructions that are executable by one or more processors and that cause the one or more processors to perform functions comprising: executing deceleration control that decelerates a vehicle when a vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater (Fig. 4, #S105) than a target vehicle speed set as a target value of the vehicle speed of the vehicle when the vehicle travels on a curved road (“The reference braking force calculation unit 104 calculates reference braking force based on the current vehicle speed Vv and the target vehicle speed Vp. The reference braking force is calculated, in the vehicle control system, based on the external environment information ahead of the vehicle, and specified to successfully approach to and travel along (more specifically, achieve the target vehicle speed in approaching to and travelling along) the target travel locus such as a corner (curve) in the direction of travel of the vehicle” (para 0043)); and causing the target vehicle speed to be greater by a predetermined value (“the braking force calculation unit 107 includes the mechanism to increase or decrease the auxiliary braking force limit value as the maximum output value of the auxiliary braking force, in accordance with the current vehicle speed and the road surface μ information (presumed road surface μ)” (para 0116)) or not executing the deceleration control (“On determination of No in S103, the auxiliary braking force control device (braking control device) 11 proceeds to S108 to determine that the auxiliary braking force is not required (no need to execute the auxiliary braking force function)” (para 0064)) even when the vehicle speed of the vehicle is greater than the target vehicle speed when a predetermined condition in which a decrease of a deceleration speed of the vehicle is detected when the vehicle travels on the curved road is met ((Fig. 4, #S105 and #S108) and “the braking force calculation unit 107 calculates the physical speed limit based on the external environment information, such as the travel path curvature, acquired by the external recognition information acquisition unit 101” (para 0072)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM ALHARBI whose telephone number is (313)446-6621. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 11:00AM – 7:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abby Flynn can be reached on (571) 272-9855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADAM M ALHARBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 16, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583435
TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING POWER DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE LOADS AND HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY SYSTEM DURING LOW STATE OF CHARGE CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12553731
ARRIVAL PREDICTIONS BASED ON DESTINATION SPECIFIC MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12548446
COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12509218
FLIGHT CONTROL FOR AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12504286
SIMULTANEOUS LOCATION AND MAPPING (SLAM) USING DUAL EVENT CAMERAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month