Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/751,137

SOLAR PANEL MOUNTING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 21, 2024
Examiner
STERLING, AMY JO
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unirac, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1291 granted / 1691 resolved
+24.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1712
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§102
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1691 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is a Non-final Office Action for application number 18/751,137 SOLAR PANEL MOUNTING APPARATUS filed on 6/21/2024. Claims 2-21 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement submitted on 10/10/2025 and 10/3/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.84(h)(5) because Figure 98 show(s) modified forms of construction in the same view. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 2-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United States Patent No. 10,756,668 to Bamat et al. With regards to claims 2, 10 and 11, the patent to Bamat et al. teaches a cap (20, 20’) a first wing (28, 158); a second wing (26, 156) extending opposite the first wing; a first vertical leg (24a, 24a’) extending perpendicular to the first wing and the second wing from a position between the first wing and the second wing, the position being closer to an end of the first wing than to an end of the second wing (See Figure 9); and a tooth (30) formed on the first vertical leg; and a base (10) configured to engage the cap when installed, the base comprising: a first support (14a); a second support (14b) extending opposite the first support; a second vertical leg (12, 12’) extending perpendicular to the first support and the second support; and a groove (19) formed in the second vertical leg of the base, the groove being engageable with the tooth. With regards to claims 3, 16 and 20, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the groove is a first groove of a plurality of grooves (19) formed along a length of the second vertical leg, and the base is vertically adjustable with respect to the cap (20, 20’) via engagement of the tooth with one of the plurality of grooves. With regards to claim 4, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the second support has an upward spring (186, 186’) bias toward the second wing. With regards to claim 5, Bamat et al. teaches an opening in the cap (155); and a fastener (38, 168) extending through the opening. With regards to claim 6, Bamat et al. teaches a fastener (38, 168) attaching the cap to the base; and a spring clip (186, 186’) attached to the fastener and the first vertical leg to maintain engagement of the tooth with the groove. With regards to claims 7, 17 and 21, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the first wing, the second wing, the first vertical leg, and the tooth are integrally formed as a single integrated structure. (See Figure 32) With regards to claims 8, 17 and 21, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the first support, the second support, the second vertical leg, and the groove are integrally formed as a single integrated structure. (See Figure 30) With regards to claim 9, Bamat et al. teaches a cap (20. 20’) having a first vertical leg (24a, 24a’) extending perpendicular to the cap; and a tooth (30) formed on the first vertical leg; and a base (10) configured to engage the cap when installed, the base comprising: a second vertical leg (12. 12’) extending perpendicular to the base; and a groove formed in the second vertical leg of the base; and a spring clip (186, 186’) attached to the cap to maintain engagement of the tooth with the groove. With regards to claim 12, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the tooth is engaged with the groove. (See Figure 21) With regards to claim 13, Bamat et al. teaches a fastener (38, 168) attaching the cap to the base. With regards to claims 14 and 15, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the first and/or second support have a biasing force towards the first wing to retain a solar panel module (374) between the first support and the first wing. With regards to claim 18, as shown above Bamat et al. teaches all of the following limitations including a cap comprising: a first wing extending horizontally from the cap; a second wing extending horizontally from the cap opposite the first wing; a first vertical leg extending downward from the cap perpendicular to the first wing and the second wing from the cap and at a position between the first wing and the second wing, the position being closer to an end of the first wing than to an end of the second wing; and a tooth formed on the first vertical leg; and a base configured to engage the cap when installed with the cap, the base comprising: a first support extending horizontally from the base; a second support extending horizontally from the base opposite the first support; a second vertical leg extending upward to be aligned with the first vertical leg of the cap; and a groove formed in the second vertical leg of the base, the groove being engageable with the tooth; a fastener attaching the cap to the base; and a spring clip attached to the fastener and the first vertical leg to maintain engagement of the tooth with the groove. With regards to claim 19, Bamat et al. teaches wherein the second support has an upward spring bias toward the second wing. (See Figure 72) Cited References PN 2019/0013772 to Bamat et al. shows a solar mount PN 2016/0268958 to Wildes et al. shows a solar mount PN 8,938,932 to Wentworth et al. shows a solar mount Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Amy J. Sterling at telephone number 571-272-6823 or to Supervisor Jonathan Liu at 571-272-8227 if the examiner cannot be reached. The examiner can normally be reached (Mon-Fri 8am-5:00pm). The fax machine number for the Technology center is 571-273-8300 (formal amendments), informal amendments or communications 571-273-6823. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application should be directed to the Technology Center receptionist at 571-272-3600. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMY J. STERLING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631 1/16/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601195
ADJUSTABLE TOP PLATE DEVICE FOR A JACK POST
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590663
CLEAN OUT PLUG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584585
ADJUSTABLE MIRROR INSTALLATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575652
KICKSTAND FOR COMPUTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567826
KIT FOR FASTENING A PANEL, PROVIDED WITH A HOLDING PART AND A CLAMPING ELEMENT, AND HOLDING PART AND CLAMPING ELEMENT OF THE FASTENING KIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1691 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month