Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/751,581

Power converter, electrical machine unit and method for current conversion

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 24, 2024
Examiner
BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seg Automotive Germany GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
913 granted / 1150 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1187
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1150 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/24/24 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 11-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are indefinite because the invention is claimed as a method, yet no steps are recited, making the scope of the method claims uncertain. See MPEP 2173.05(q) “Use” Claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 11, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Wijekoon (WO 2022/226941). Examiner notes for the rejections below, US 2024/0055993 is used as an English equivalent. With respect to claim 1, Wijekoon discloses a power converter (Fig. 7 4) with two DC voltage connections (Fig. 5 IN1,IN2) and several AC voltage connections (Fig. 7 OUTa,OUTb,OUTc), wherein the power converter comprises a first partial power converter (Fig. 5 SC1,SC2,D1,D2,BS) and a second partial power converter (Fig. 5 S3,S4), wherein the first partial power converter comprises first semiconductor switching elements (Fig. 5 S11,S12,S13,S14,D1,D2,BS) and is configured as a three-level power converter (Fig. 5 NPC is three level) or power converter with more than three levels, wherein the second partial power converter comprises second semiconductor switching elements (Fig. 5 S3,S4) and is configured as a two-level power converter, and wherein the first partial power converter and the second partial power converter are each connected or are connectable between the two DC voltage connections (Fig. 5 IN1,IN2) and the several AC voltage connections (Fig. 7 OUTa,OUTb,OUTc). With respect to claim 2, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 1, wherein the first semiconductor switching elements (paragraph 63, “The second switch of the first series connection and the second switch of the second series connection each may be an IGBT”) and the second semiconductor switching elements (paragraph 69, “The third switch and the fourth switch may be transistors, such IGBTs, FETs, MOSFETs, BJTs and/or JFETs”) are different from each other, in particular are of different types [MOSFET different type from an IGBT]. With respect to claim 3, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 2, wherein the first semiconductor switching elements comprise or are IGBTs (Fig. 6 S12,S22 comprise IGBTs). With respect to claim 4, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 2, wherein the second semiconductor switching elements comprise or are MOSFETs (paragraph 69), in particular SiC-MOSFETs and/or GaN-HEMTs. With respect to claim 5, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 1, wherein the first partial power converter is configured as a three-level power converter of the T-type, NPC-type (Fig. 5 SC1,SC2,D1,D2,BS forms NPC) or flying capacitor type. With respect to claim 6, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 1, wherein the second partial power converter comprises a plurality of second half bridges (Fig. 7 5a,5b,5c) each having two of the second semiconductor switching elements (Fig. 5 S3,S4). With respect to claim 8, Wijekoon discloses the power converter according to claim 1 wherein the first partial power converter and the second partial power converter are integrated into each other (Fig. 5 3 combined in parallel). With respect to claim 11, Wijekoon discloses a method (Fig. 8 100) of power conversion using a power converter (Fig. 7 4) according to claim 1. With respect to claim 14, Wijekoon discloses the method according to claim 11, wherein, in a mixed mode operation (paragraph 145 both operated), the first and second partial power converters are used for current conversion (Fig. 5 convert DC to AC). With respect to claim 15, Wijekoon discloses the method according to claim 14, wherein, in a first mixed mode operation mode (paragraph 145), the first partial power converter is activated first, and then the second partial power converter is activated (paragraph 145, “In order to achieve that conduction losses reduction, these additional two switches S3 and S4 are operated such that they are switched between the nonconducting state and the conducting state (that is they open and close), when the series connection SC1 respectively SC2 (respective branch) connected in parallel is conducting.”). Claim(s) 1, 7 ,11 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Zhang (CN 104702140). With respect to claim 1, Zhang discloses a power converter (Fig. 1) with two DC voltage connections (Fig. 1 P1,N1) and several AC voltage connections (Fig. 1 connections to ea,eb,ec), wherein the power converter comprises a first partial power converter (Fig. 1 Sa1-Sa3,Sb1-Sb3,Sc1-Sc3) and a second partial power converter (Fig. 1 Sa1’-Sa11’,Sb1’-Sb11’,Sc1’-Sc11’), wherein the first partial power converter comprises first semiconductor switching elements (Fig. 1 Sa1-Sa3,Sb1-Sb3,Sc1-Sc3) and is configured as a three-level power converter (Fig. 1 T type) or power converter with more than three levels, wherein the second partial power converter comprises second semiconductor switching elements (Fig. 1 Sa1’-Sa11’,Sb1’-Sb11’,Sc1’-Sc11’) and is configured as a two-level power converter (Fig. 1 T type comprises a 2-level converter), and wherein the first partial power converter and the second partial power converter are each connected or are connectable between the two DC voltage connections (Fig. 1 P1,N1) and the several AC voltage connections (Fig. 1 connections to ea,eb,ec). With respect to claim 7, Zhang discloses the power converter according to claim 1 wherein the first partial power converter (Fig. 1 Sa1-Sa3,Sb1-Sb3,Sc1-Sc3) and the second partial power converter (Fig. 1 Sa1’-Sa11’,Sb1’-Sb11’,Sc1’-Sc11’) are connected in parallel to one another and are formed separately from one another. With respect to claim 11, Zhang discloses a method of power conversion using a power converter (Fig. 1) according to claim 1. With respect to claim 17, Zhang discloses the method according to claim 11, wherein, in an energy transfer mode (Fig. 9) in which energy is transferred between an energy storage (Fig. 1 C1,C2) and a power grid (Fig. 1 ea,eb,ec) via the power converter, the second partial power converter is used for power conversion [since both used]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9, 10 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu (US 2019/0238062) in view of Wijekoon (WO 2022/226941). With respect to claim 9, Lu discloses an electrical machine unit (Fig. 7) comprising an electrical machine (Fig. 7 Load) having one or more phases (Fig. 7 three phase) and a power converter (Fig. 3 Inverter/Rectifier Module) wherein the one or more phases are each connected to a respective one of the several AC voltage connections (Fig. 7 inverter connections to Load). Lu does not require the power converter to be implemented according to claim 1. Wijekoon teaches a power converter as set forth above. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement an electrical machine having one or more phases and a power converter according to claim 1, wherein the one or more phases are each connected to a respective one of the several AC voltage connections, in order to power the electrical machine with high efficiency. With respect to claim 10, Lu in view of Wijekoon make obvious the electrical machine unit () according to claim 9, which is configured as a traction drive (paragraph 44) of a vehicle (Fig. 14 EV). With respect to claim 19, Lu in view of Wijekoon make obvious a method of power conversion using an electrical machine unit (Lu Fig. 7) according to claim 9. Claim(s) 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wijekoon (WO 2022/226941) in view of Fong (US 2022/0329149). With respect to claim 12, Wijekoon discloses the method according to claim 11 as set forth above, wherein both partial converters are active, and remains silent to one of the partial converters being inactive. It was known before the effective filing date of the invention to have one of the partial converters active and the other inactive. Fong discloses wherein, in a partial operation mode, only one of the first (Fig. 4 35W Converter: ON) and second partial power converters is used for current conversion, and wherein the other of the first and second partial power converters is inactive (Fig. 4 65W Converter: OFF). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement wherein, in a partial operation mode, only one of the first and second partial power converters is used for current conversion, and wherein the other of the first and second partial power converters is inactive, in order to reduce power consumption during low power operation. With respect to claim 13, Wijekoon in view of Fong make obvious the method according to claim 12, wherein, in a first partial operation mode, when a demanded load is below a predetermined threshold, the second partial power converter is used for current conversion, and/or wherein, in a second partial operation mode [normal operation], when a demanded load is above the predetermined threshold, the first partial power converter is used for current conversion (since both used). Claim(s) 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wijekoon (WO 2022/226941) in view of Li (CN115579839). With respect to claim 18, Wijenkoon discloses the method according to claim 11, as set forth above, wherein first the low-side or high-side semiconductor switching elements of the first partial power converter are closed (Fig. 5 NPC switched first) and then the low-side or high-side switching elements of the second partial power converter are closed (Fig. 5 S3,S4 switched after NPC switches conducting) and remains silent as to the over-current protection. Li discloses wherein, in an active-short-circuit mode, all low-side (Fig. 2 low side switches turned on) or high-side semiconductor switching elements are closed, wherein first the low-side or high-side semiconductor switching elements of the first partial power converter are closed and then the low-side or high-side switching elements of the second partial power converter are closed. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement in an active-short-circuit mode, all low-side or high-side semiconductor switching elements are closed, wherein first the low-side or high-side semiconductor switching elements of the first partial power converter are closed and then the low-side or high-side switching elements of the second partial power converter are closed, in order to protect the load and converter by recirculating the current in the load during short circuit conditions. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 16 is rejected as indefinite for the reasons stated above, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims and if the indefinite type rejections stated above were overcome. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to claim 16, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, in combination with the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, primarily, wherein, in a second mixed mode operation, and when the first and second partial power converters have an equal rated power within predetermined tolerances, the one of the first and second partial power converters that has lower switching losses is activated first, and then the other of the first and second partial power converters is activated. The aforementioned limitations in combination with all remaining limitations of the respective claims are believed to render the aforementioned indicated claim and any dependent claims thereof patentable over the art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Alahutala (EP 2728734A1) discloses parallel converters. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY RAYMOND BEHM whose telephone number is (571)272-8929. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY R BEHM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 24, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601768
MONITORING ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM HAVING A MONITORING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587102
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH OPTIMIZED AVAILABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567814
Method and Device for Calibrating a Time Base Signal in a Photovoltaic Inverter
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567733
FAULT PROTECTION APPARATUS AND PHOTOVOLTAIC INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562564
REDUCING INRUSH CURRENT TO A CAPACITOR BANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1150 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month