Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/752,430

SEAT CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 24, 2024
Priority
Nov 21, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0162499
Examiner
KLEINMAN, LAIL A
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
322 granted / 457 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
481
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 457 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims This action is in response to the applicant’s filing on September 8, 2026. Claims 1, 2, 4, 11, 12, and 14 have been amended. Claims 5-7, and 15-17 have been canceled. Claims 1-4, 8-14, and 18-20 are pending and examined below. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on September 8, 2026 has been entered. Response to Remarks/Arguments Applicant’s arguments and amendments filed September 8, 2026 with respect to the previous 35 U.S.C. 112 rejections have been fully considered. The present amendments incorporate subject matter from previously rejected claims 5 and 15 rendering the previous rejections of those claims moot, however, raising new grounds of rejection for claims 1 and 11 discussed below. Applicant’s arguments and amendments filed September 8, 2026 with respect to the previous 35 U.S.C. 103 rejections have been fully considered and render moot the previous rejections under 35 U.S.C. 103. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, and 8-14, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claims 1 and 11, the recitation “identifying first reference data and second reference data having the first current state from the mapping table when coordinate data corresponding to the first current state is not identified from the mapping table, wherein the first current state is located between the first reference data and the second reference data” is vague and indefinite. Similar to the previous rejections regarding claims 5 and 15, it is unclear how to perform the claimed identifying of reference data because the identifying of first and second reference data appears to occur when coordinate data corresponding to a first current state is not identified, however, the claim requires identifying the first current state exists within the first and second reference data. It is unclear how to determine whether the first current state is located between first and second reference data when coordinate data for the first current state cannot be identified because coordinate data appears to be how seat states are expressed. Applicant’s Specification offers no further clarification (See at least ¶67, 68, and 82 of Applicant’s PGPUB). Therefore, it is unclear what is being claimed in light of Applicant’s original disclosure. Claims 2-4, 8-10, depend from claim 1, and claims 12-14, and 18-20 depend from claim 11. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lail Kleinman whose telephone number is (571)272-6286. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr can be reached at (571)272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAIL A KLEINMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 24, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757808
METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUSLY WEEDING CROPS IN AN AGRICULTURAL FIELD
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759579
VEHICLE, VEHICLE CONTROL INTERFACE BOX, AND AUTONOMOUS DRIVING VEHICLE
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12746855
ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROUGH AND PRECISE ADJUSTMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729063
AUTOMATIC TRANSPORTATION OF PALLETS OF GOODS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728771
SEAT CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 457 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month