Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/753,251

PRESBYOPIA-CORRECTING LENS SYSTEM HAVING HYPEROPIC / MYOPIC CORRECTION-DEPENDENT DESIGNS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Priority
Jun 27, 2023 — provisional 63/523,418
Examiner
BROOME, SHARRIEF I
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Johnson & Johnson
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
653 granted / 800 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
819
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 800 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/21/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement As required by M.P.E.P. 609, the applicant’s submissions of the Information Disclosure Statement dated 7/21/2026 is acknowledged by the examiner and the cited references have been considered in the examination of the claims now pending. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In at least claim 1 the term “substantially” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear how the applicant is measuring substantially correct or substantially accurate since these are terms of degree/ subjective terms. The term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degrees, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). See In re Wiggins, 488 F. 2d 538, 541, 179 USPQ 421, 423 (CCPA 1973). Dependent claims 2-20 are rejected as dependent upon claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowed, pending applicant’s overcoming of the 112(b) or 112 2nd rejection above. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: with respect to the allowable subject matter, none of the prior art either alone or in combination disclose or teach of the claimed combination of limitations to warrant a rejection under 35 USC 102 or 103. The prior art fails to teach all the limitations of claim 1, including the limitations directed to a contact lens system, comprising: a first add optical zone having a first add zone power profile comprising a myopic paraxial power selected to correct myopic refractive error and a first add power; and a first transitional optical zone surrounding the first add optical zone, the first transitional optical zone having a myopic progressive power profile; and the myopic power profile comprising the first add zone power profile and the myopic progressive power profile, the myopic power profile includes a first spherical aberration (SPHA); and a plurality of hyperopic-correcting lenses, each having a hyperopic power profile and each comprising: a second add optical zone having a second add zone power profile comprising a hyperopic paraxial power selected to correct hyperopic refractive error and a second add power; and a second transitional optical zone surrounding the second add optical zone, the second transitional optical zone having a hyperopic progressive power profile; the hyperopic power profile comprising the second add zone power profile and the hyperopic progressive power profile, the hyperopic power profile having a second SPHA; wherein the second SPHA of each of the plurality of hyperopic-correcting lenses is at least ten percent (10%) less than the first SPHA of each of the plurality of myopic- correcting lenses. Claims 2-20 are allowable based upon dependency to respective independent claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wooley (20170276961), Buehren (20140375949), Back (20130201442), and Lang (20030125806) are cited for being examples of a multifocal ophthalmic lens system that provides foveal vision correction. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sharrief I Broome whose telephone number is (571)272-3454. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached at 571-272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Sharrief I. Broome Primary Examiner Art Unit 2872 /SHARRIEF I BROOME/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §112
Jul 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704765
MAGNETIC STRUCTURE OF VOICE COIL MOTOR, VOICE COIL MOTOR, ZOOM LENS AND PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703175
Automotive Window Laminate Structure, Thermoplastic Laminated Sheet Structure for Use Therein and Transport Vehicle Provided With the Same
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697874
HEADS UP DISPLAY SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699258
LENS SYSTEM FOR WAVEFRONT MODULATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693549
Multifocal Ophthalmic Lenses and Related Methods
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+4.1%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month