Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/753,468

PROTECTIVE COVER FOR CONNECTOR AND CABLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Examiner
JOHNSON, RASHAD H
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
443 granted / 554 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
579
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 554 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/25/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 2-3 are objected to because of the following informalities: “the connecting member” should read –flexible connecting member--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schroedel et al. (US 2017/0149363). In claim 1, Schroedel discloses (Fig. 1-11) a protective cover (34, 38) for a connector (12) of an electric device (1; [0036]) mounted on a vehicle ([0004]) and a cable (33) connected to the connector (12), the protective cover (34, 38) comprising: a first rigid protective member (38) that covers the connector (12); a second rigid protective member (respective 38) that covers the cable (33) extending from the connector (12) at a position distant from the connector (12); and a flexible connecting member (34) that is provided in a clearance between the first rigid protective member (38) and the second rigid protective member (respective 38) and connects the first rigid protective member (38) and the second rigid protective member (respective 38) while slacking away from the cable (33). In claim 2, Schroedel discloses wherein: the connector (12) is attached to a side surface of the electric device (1; [0036]) in a vehicle width direction; and the connecting member (34) has a slack shape to project in the vehicle width direction. In claim 4, Schroedel discloses wherein the electric device (1) is a unit including at least a drive motor of the vehicle ([0032]). In claim 5, Schroedel discloses electrified vehicle comprising: an electric device (1); and the protective cover (34, 38) according to claim 1 that is provided for the electric device (1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Schroedel et al. (US 2017/0149363) in view of Szilagyi et al. (US 2010/0170693). In claim 3, Schroedel teaches the cover of claim 1, with the exception of wherein the connecting member is a mesh sheet member. However, Szilagyi teaches a protective cover (Fig. 1-4) wherein the connecting member (26) is a mesh sheet member. Therefore in view of Szilagyi, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have arrived at the claimed invention, in order to provide structural integrity to the cable and protect against cable damage caused by short circuit connections (Szilagyi; [0021]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Adachi et al. (US 2010/0243321) teaches a motor cable assembly connecting a motor and an inverter including a cable main body, which can move flexibly. Kogure et al. (US 2020/0070748) teaches a wire harness including: a flexible conductor; a flexible restricting member extending along the conductor and restricting a path of the conductor; a flexible armoring member through which the conductor and the restricting member are inserted; a first holding member including a first recessed part and fixed to the vehicle body. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RASHAD H JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1231. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RASHAD H. JOHNSON Examiner Art Unit 2834 /RASHAD H JOHNSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597823
Rotor and Method for Producing a Rotor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597819
Insulation Device, Motor Stator and Motor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573921
ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SHIELD TO PREVENT BEARING AND/OR GEARBOX DAMAGE DUE TO SHAFT INDUCED VOLTAGE IN ELECTRIC MOTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573907
STATOR HAVING SLOTS FILLED WITH RESIN FOR INSULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567790
MAGNETIC FLUX MODULATED TYPE MAGNETIC GEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 554 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month