Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/753,491

REFRIGERATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Priority
Aug 30, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0114980 +3 more
Examiner
WILKENS, JANET MARIE
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
906 granted / 1251 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1272
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1251 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Darney (GB2,439,328) in view of Caputo (EP1561890). Darney teaches a refrigerator (Fig. 4a) comprising: a main body (402) forming a storage compartment; a door (210) configured to open and close the storage compartment and including a guide rail (412 on 408); and a hinge bracket (406) connecting the main body and the door so that the door is rotatable about a rotation axis (at 418) between an open position at which the storage compartment is open (Fig. 5d), and a closed position at which the storage compartment is closed (Fig. 5a), wherein the guide rail is spaced apart from the rotation axis, the hinge bracket includes a guide shaft (416) inserted into the guide rail and configured to guide rotation of the door, and the guide rail includes: a first end (416 location on rail shown in Fig. 5a) where the guide shaft is located when the door is in the closed position, a second end where the guide shaft is located when the door is in the open position (416 location on rail shown in Fig. 5d), a free area between the first end and the second end having a first width (416 location on rail shown in Fig. 5c) and having an arc shape approximately centered on the rotation axis. For claim 18, Darney fails to teach limited areas between the first and second ends and the free area, respectively, having second or third widths, respectively, which are less than a first width of the free area. Caputo teaches a guide rail (Figs. 1 & 2) having a limited area (16a,17a) between its first end (at 21) and a free area (at 22), the limited area having a second width (d12) which is less than a first width of the free area (see Fig. 2). The guide rail also teaches a second end (at 23) having an opening limited area (16b,17b) between the second end and the free area having a third width (d13) which is less than the first width. It would have obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the guide rail of Darney by adding limited areas, such as is taught by Caputo, adjacent the first and second ends, to provide a locking/dampening mechanism with the hinge device when the door is in the open and closed positions. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claim 18, filed April 21, 2026, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As stated at the interview, the reference of Caputo (EP1561890) teaches plural limited areas on a curved guide rail. It would have obvious to modify the guide rail of Darney (GB2,439,328) by adding limited areas, such as is taught by Caputo, adjacent the first and second ends, to provide a locking/dampening mechanism with the hinge device when the door is in the open and closed positions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANET M WILKENS whose telephone number is 571-272-6869. The examiner can normally be reached Mon thru Thurs 7am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Wilkens May 7, 2026 /JANET M WILKENS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12628939
MULTIFUNCTIONAL FOLDING TABLE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617325
SUPPORT DEVICE FOR AN AIRCRAFT CABIN INTERIOR LAYOUT ASSEMBLY, RELATED ASSEMBLY AND METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616297
HARD AND FRANGIBLE MATERIAL TABLETOP SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612214
COMPOSITE MULTI-FUNCTIONAL LOAD-BEARING PALLET
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610486
CASING DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1251 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month