Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/753,914

Alignment of Medical Images in Augmented Reality Displays

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Examiner
GARCIA, GABRIEL I
Art Unit
2682
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Novarad Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
708 granted / 781 resolved
+28.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§102
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 781 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Part III DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. This application has been examined. This office action is in response to the amendment filed on 08/02/25. Claims 1-34 are pending in this application. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 2. Claims 1-34 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-34 of U.S. Patent No. 12,016,633. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1-34 of the instant application are anticipated recited by the limitations of claims 1-34 of ‘633, such as claim 1 of the instant application recites a method comprising: obtaining an image data set of a portion of a body of a person, wherein the image data set includes a marker to identify an anatomical location (reads on the obtaining step of ‘633); identifying a spatial location using a physical pointer object in a field of view of an optical sensor associated with an AR (augmented reality) headset (reads on the identifying step of ‘633); registering the spatial location for a visible anatomical feature as identified using the physical pointer object (reads on the registering step of ‘633); and aligning the image data set with the body of the person using the spatial location recorded for the visible anatomical feature as referenced to the marker in the image data set (reads on the aligning step of ‘633) . Clearly the features of independent claims 1, 27 and 32 of the instant application are covered by the limitations of claims are described in claims 1,27 and 32 of ‘633. With regard to claims 2-26, 27-31 and 32-34 of the instant application are covered by the limitations of claims are described in claims 2-26, 27-31 and 32-34 of ‘633 3. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gabriel I. Garcia whose telephone number is (571) 272-7434. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday from 7:30 AM-6:00 PM.. The fax phone number for this group is (571) 273-8600. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benny Tieu can be reached on (571) 272-7490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571- 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application should be directed to the Group receptionist whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. /Gabriel I Garcia/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2682 October 07, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Aug 02, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602945
REAL-TIME DOCUMENT FORGERY DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602749
PARAMETER OPTIMIZING METHOD OF NEURAL NETWORK AND COMPUTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593001
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR ASSOCIATING FRONT SIDE AND BACK SIDE OF SHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12568194
GAZE AND DEPTH BASED CAMERA FOCUSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561010
Device Orientation Detection
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 781 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month