Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/754,670

NOVEL IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC MOLECULES AND USES THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 30, 2012 — AU 2012904780 +4 more
Examiner
ROONEY, NORA MAUREEN
Art Unit
1641
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Aravax Pty Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
447 granted / 739 resolved
+0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. 2. Applicant’s response filed on 11/17/2025 is acknowledged. 3. Claims 1-26 and 28-29 are pending and under consideration for their full scope. 4. The following rejections are necessitated by the amendment filed on 11/17/2025. 5. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claims 1-2, 20-26 and 28-29 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S Patent Application Publication 2003/235594 (PTO-892; Reference A) as evidenced by the attached sequence alignment. U.S Patent Application Publication 2003/235594 teaches an isolated nucleic acid sequence encoding an antigen presentation enhancing hybrid polypeptide comprising the following elements: a) an N-terminal element consisting essentially of 4- 16 residues of the mammalian Ii-Key peptide LRMKLPKPPKPVSKMR and non-N- terminal deletion modifications thereof that retain antigen presentation enhancing activity; b) a chemical structure covalently linking the N- terminal element of step a) to the MHC Class II- presented epitope of element c), the chemical structure being a covalently joined group of atoms which when arranged in a linear fashion forms a flexible chain which extends up to the length of 20 amino acids likewise arranged in a linear fashion, the chemical structure being selected from the group consisting of: i) immunologically neutral chemical structures; ii) a MHC Class I epitope or a portion thereof; and/or iii) an antibody-recognized determinant or a portion thereof; and c) an antigenic epitope in the form of a polypeptide or peptidomimetic structure which binds to the antigenic peptide binding site of an MHC class II molecule; wherein the C- terminal element further comprises an MHC Class I- presented epitope, or a portion thereof, the amino acid residues comprising the MHC Class I-presented epitope or portion thereof being constituent residues of the MHC Class II-presented epitope; and wherein the C- terminal element further comprises an antibody- recognized determinant, or a portion thereof, the amino acid residues comprising the antibody-recognized determinant or a portion thereof being constituent residues of the MHC Class II-presented epitope.(In particular, claims, whole document) The reference teaches the nucleic acids within a viral expression vector which also comprises nucleic acid encoding promoter and enhancer functions also may be included, for example, to provide for tissue-specific expression following in vivo administration. (In particular, paragraphs [0042]-[0055]). The reference teaches that the nucleic acids in viral vectors can be used to treat allergic disease to peanuts. (In particular, paragraph [0078]) The reference teaches the Ii-Key/Ara h 1 hybrids comprising peanut epitopes from Ara h 1 (In particular, Example 1, Table 1) which comprise at least SEQ ID Nos 1, 8, 9 and 12 of Ar h1 1-5-6 (22 amino acids), Ara h1 1-5-4 (13 amino acids), Ara h 1 1-3-5 (16 amino acids) and Ara h1 1-2-4 (9 amino acids). (In particular, tables 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5, paragraphs [0118]-[0125], whole document). The recitations in claims 20-24 are inherent in the reference vectors. Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties. A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. In re Spada 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). See MPEP 2112.01. From the combined teachings of the reference, it is apparent that one of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of success in producing the claimed invention. Therefore, the invention as a whole was prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made, as evidenced by the references, especially in the absence of evidence to the contrary. 7. No claim is allowed. 8. Claims 3-19 are objected to for dependence upon rejected base claims 1-2 but appear to be allowable if re-written in independent form. 9. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NORA MAUREEN ROONEY whose telephone number is (571)272-9937. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 8:00am to 4:30pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Misook Yu, can be reached at telephone number (571) 272-0839. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. March 7, 2026 /Nora M Rooney/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Jun 12, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631652
METHODS OF DETECTING MARKERS FOR INFLAMMATORY CONDITIONS AND FOOD SENSITIVITY IN COMPANION ANIMALS
4y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629414
Methods and Devices for the Treatment of Food Allergies
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630594
ALLERGY ANTIGEN AND EPITOPE FOR SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624099
POLYPEPTIDE IMPROVED IN PROTEIN PURITY AND AFFINITY FOR ANTIGEN, CONJUGATE THEREOF WITH ANTIBODY OR ANTIGEN-BINDING FRAGMENT, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
6y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624097
NUCLEIC ACIDS, VECTORS, AND CELLS THAT ENCODE ANTI-SP17 ANTIBODIES AND OTHER SP17 BINDING PROTEINS
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+23.2%)
3y 5m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month