Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/754,720

RESIN PARTICLE, TONER, DEVELOPING AGENT, AND TONER ACCOMMODATING UNIT

Non-Final OA §102§103§Other
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 03, 2023 — JP 2023-109090
Examiner
KUIPERS, JENNA ANN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
28 granted / 39 resolved
+11.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 39 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2023-109090, filed on 7/3/2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sacripante (US PGP 2014-0134534). Sacripante teaches a toner which is composed of biodegradable and recycled materials (Abstract). The toner comprises a polyester binder resin, wherein the binder resin comprises recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) ([0005]). The amount of PET in the binder resin is from 5% to 70% by weight ([0019] line 3-5). The binder resin further comprises bio-based materials ([0019] line 6-8). Examples of polyols which may be used for the polyester include 1,2-propanediol (propylene glycol) ([0030] line 1-3), and Example 4 of a sustainable resin includes 1,2 propylene glycol as a monomer ([0143]). In this example the propylene glycol is approximately 10.3% by mass of the entire binder resin (117g/1,133g). The toner further comprises a wax ([0067]), which may be an ester wax ([0069]). The toner may have a core shell structure ([0104],[0116]). A toner particle having a shell would be expected to have a circumferential length occupied by the release agent of less than 5% of the entire circumferential length of the outermost surface of the toner particle, as most of the release agent present near the surface of the core particle would be covered by the shell layer. The toner may be mixed with a carrier to form a two-component developer ([0126]). The toner may be combined with an enclosure for a toner accommodating unit ([0131]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sacripante (US PGP 2014-0134534) in view of Yoko (WO 2022-202672). The entire discussion of Sacripante above is included herein. Although Sacripante teaches that the toner contains biomass-derived components, the origin of the propylene glycol used in the binder resin is not disclosed. Yoko teaches a polyester resin including a bio-mass derived polyhydric alcohol and polyethylene terephthalate (Abstract, [0014]), which may be used in toners ([0002]). The biomass-derived monomers are included in the resin in order to reduce the environmental impact of the resin ([0027]). Examples of the biomass-derived polyhydric alcohol components include propylene glycol ([0021]), and exemplary resins 5 and 7-11 include biomass-derived propylene glycol as one of the alcohol components (Table 1, [0066]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the toner of Sacripante to have used propylene glycol that is biomass-derived in order to further reduce the environmental impact of the toner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jenna Kuipers whose telephone number is (571)272-0161. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 5:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K./Examiner, Art Unit 1734 /PETER L VAJDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1737 08/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748357
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12704795
FINE PARTICLE CONTAINING SILICON AND TONER
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681403
ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675060
TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669760
SILICA PARTICLE, TONER FOR DEVELOPING ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE, ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPER, TONER CARTRIDGE, PROCESS CARTRIDGE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-6.1%)
3y 4m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 39 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month