Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/755,034

Connector

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Feb 21, 2022 — JP 2022-025079 +1 more
Examiner
TA, THO DAC
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1346 granted / 1555 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1565
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1555 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hitchcock et al. (US 11590852 B2), ( Appl. No. 17/237,675, Filed Apr. 22, 2021). In regard to claim 1, Hitchcock et al. discloses a connector 100 comprising: a housing 102 having an opening portion 120 having a tubular shape; a rotating cover 200 having a tubular portion 224 fitted into the opening portion 120 and rotatably attached to the housing 102; and an annular packing 228 disposed at a fitting portion of the opening portion and the tubular portion and configured to seal the fitting portion by being compressed in a direction intersecting a connector fitting direction, wherein: the annular packing 228 includes a first sealing portion (see annotated drawing below) and a second sealing portion (see annotated drawing below); the first sealing portion is provided at a position closer to a rotating shaft (adjacent 205) of the rotating cover 200 than the second sealing portion; and the second sealing portion is provided at a position farther away from the rotating shaft than the first sealing portion, and is compressed between the opening portion and the tubular portion 224 at the same timing (col. 4, lines 52-67, col. 5, lines 14-19, claims 10 and 18) as the first sealing portion when the rotating cover 200 is closed. In regard to claim 2, Hitchcock et al. discloses the annular packing 228 is provided so that the first sealing portion, the second sealing portion and a third sealing portion (between the first sealing portion and the second sealing portion) are positioned on a first plane inclined and intersecting with respect to the connector fitting direction of the tubular portion 224 and parallel to the rotating shaft when the rotating cover 200 is closed, and the second sealing portion is positioned on a second plane perpendicular to the connector fitting direction and including the rotating shaft when the rotating cover 200 is closed (see fig. 5). In regard to claim 3, Hitchcock et al. discloses the tubular portion 224 is fitted inside the opening portion 120, and the annular packing 228 is provided so that the first sealing portion and the second sealing portion are positioned on a first plane inclined and intersecting with respect to the connector fitting direction and parallel to the rotating shaft so that the second sealing portion is positioned on a front side of the connector fitting direction with respect to the first sealing portion when the rotating cover 200 is closed, and the second sealing portion is positioned on the second plane perpendicular to the connector fitting direction and including the rotating shaft when the rotating cover is closed (see fig. 5). [AltContent: textbox (1st sealing portion)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: textbox (2nd sealing portion)][AltContent: connector] PNG media_image1.png 810 432 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to provide, teach or suggest the tubular portion is fitted outside the opening portion, and the second sealing portion is positioned on a rear side of the connector fitting direction with respect to the first sealing portion when the rotating cover is closed, and the first sealing portion is positioned on the second plane perpendicular to the connector fitting direction and including the rotating shaft when the rotating cover is closed. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO D. TA whose telephone number is (571)272-2014. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-4:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdt 6/28/2026 /THO D TA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683325
CONNECTOR RETAINER CAP ASSEMBLY
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683303
CONDUCTOR TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683327
CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683322
Peripheral Seal with Sloped Ribs
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676433
CONNECTOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.0%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1555 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month