Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/755,405

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Jun 30, 2023 — JP 2023-108515
Examiner
SIDDIQUI, KASHIF
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1129 granted / 1283 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1303
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
71.3%
+31.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1283 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 18/755,405 CTNF 86652 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claims 1-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the claim language comprises several ambiguities which render the claim indefinite: The limitation “receive a change request of an access point serving as a connection destination from an access point” appears to indicate that an access point is receiving a change request from an access point. It is unclear whether the first instance of “access point” is receiving from another access point or from itself. In the latter case, it is unclear how an access point receives a request from itself. The limitation “set processing based on the change request from the access point to enabled or disabled” does not render clear from which of the two previous instances of “an access point” is being enabled or disabled. The limitation “in response to the processing being set to disabled, perform control such that a connection to a connected access point is disconnected, the disconnected access point is notified of information indicating that the electronic apparatus does not support the change request, and a reconnection to the disconnected access point is established” identifies a third access point (i.e., a connected access point). It is unclear to what the connected access point is connected – the first instance of “an access point” or the second instance of “an access point” or the electronic apparatus. Further the claim indicates that there is notification that the electronic device does not support the change request; however, the change request is for an access point. This renders the claim unclear as to whether the electronic device is part of “an access point” or whether the electronic device is a distinct entity. In the latter case, it is unclear what is intended by the electronic device not supporting the change request when the change is performed by an access point. Similar rationale applies to independent claims 21-25. Claims 2-20 are similarly rejected due to their dependence upon claim 1. The Examiner notes that given the number of ambiguities present within the claims, the Examiner is unable to properly identity the scope of the claims in their current presentation. Upon correction of the aforementioned ambiguities, the Examiner would be able to properly determine said scope and perform an examination on the merits of the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KASHIF SIDDIQUI whose telephone number is (571)270-3188. The examiner can normally be reached on M-R 6:00 EST to 16:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Rutkowski can be reached on 571-270-1215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KASHIF SIDDIQUI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2415 Application/Control Number: 18/755,405 Page 2 Art Unit: 2415 Application/Control Number: 18/755,405 Page 3 Art Unit: 2415
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684619
TRANSMISSION NODE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684624
RANDOM ACCESS METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684625
RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL PREAMBLE ASSIGNMENTS FOR DUAL CONNECTIVITY
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677134
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZED IDENTITY TRANSLATION FLOW
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677319
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASUREMENT WEIGHT FACTORS IN A RADIO SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1283 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month