Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/755,817

COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — CN 202111622197.9 +1 more
Examiner
MASUR, PAUL H
Art Unit
2417
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
600 granted / 688 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
707
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 688 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-19 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9/4/2024 was filed. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 4/14/2025 was filed. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. NPL Reference #1 from this IDS does not appear in the file wrapper, so the examiner has crossed out the reference on the IDS. See MPEP 609.05(b). The examiner obtained a copy of the reference and has attached it to this correspondence and cited it on the PTO-892. Drawings The drawings were received on 7/8/2024. These drawings are accepted. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 9-16, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xu et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0037601). As per claim 1, Xu et al. teach a communication method, comprising: receiving first indication information from an access network device [Xu, ¶ 0077, “FIG. 6A is described first. FIG. 6A illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the BS 170. The BS 170 transmits a signal 605 (e.g., control signal, such as a radio resource control (RRC) signal and/or a downlink control information (DCI) message) to the assisted ED 110a, and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b, to indicate the mode of cooperation (e.g., relay mode or joint communication mode) to be used”, Fig. 6 shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 605 is received from the BS (see element 170, or network access device).], wherein the first indication information indicates to enable or disable aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0077, “If the joint communication mode is indicated, the signal 605 may further indicate whether data duplication or data splitting should be used. The BS 170 may, for example, determine which mode of cooperation to be used based on detected channel conditions (e.g., measured channel quality between the BS 170 and the assisted ED 110a and/or feedback information received from the EDs 110), detected mobility of the assisted ED 110a, or other factors. The BS 170 may further indicate which ED should be used as the cooperating ED 110b (e.g., based on which ED has better channel conditions) and may include indication of one or more preferred cooperating EDs 110b in the signal 605”, Messaging to indicate the cooperation mode may be seen as enabling/disabling (see ¶ 0049) the cooperation (aggregated) transmission.], the aggregated transmission comprises first data transmission performed with the access network device through a first terminal and a second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0081, “In joint communication mode, the shared data (either duplicated data or a portion of the split data) is transmitted UL, over the Uu interface, from the cooperating ED 110b to the BS 170 (620). A joint UL transmission of data (625) (either the duplicated data or another portion of the split data) is performed by the assisted ED 110a and/or optionally by another cooperating ED 110b (not shown). The BS 170 receives the jointly transmitted data and processes the data accordingly. For example, if data splitting was performed, the BS 170 may identify the portions of data (e.g., using information contained in headers associated with the data) and reassemble the portions in order to recover the complete data”, Messages 620 and 625 represent the split data used in joint communication mode. The assisted ED (first terminal) and the cooperating ED (second terminal) jointly perform data transmission (see also ¶s 0046 and 0071).], the first data comprises first sub-data and second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).], the first sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the first terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).], and the second sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).]; and enabling or disabling the aggregated transmission based on the first indication information [Xu, ¶ 0049, “the coordination of ED cooperation (e.g., enabling/disabling of cooperation mode and/or selection of the type of cooperation) may be via a control signal from the BS and/or the assisted ED. The control signal may be a lower layer signal (e.g., a physical layer or L1 signal) and/or a higher layer signal (e.g., a logical link control (LLC) signal)”, Control signalling is used to enable/disable cooperation mode signalling.]. As per claim 2, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 1. Xu et al. also teach wherein the first indication information further comprises first sub-indication information indicating a manner of distributing the first data into the first sub-data and/or the second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0139, “FIG. 12A shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the PDCP layer. Each portion is then separately processed in the radio link control (RLC), MAC and PHY layers. FIG. 12B shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the MAC layer. FIG. 12C shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the PHY layer. The method in which data is split may impact the ease of reassembling the data at the destination (e.g., at the BS 170). In some examples, the method for splitting data may be specified when the mode of cooperation is indicated (e.g., as part of the signal 605 or 655 described above), may be preconfigured (e.g., using RRC signaling, or defined in standards), may be selected by the data source (e.g., at the assisted ED 110a), may be selected dynamically”, Data splitting information used for cooperation mode be indicated in the network signal.]. As per claim 3, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 1. Xu et al. also teach wherein the first indication information comprises at least one of: aggregated-transmission enabling indication information, aggregated-transmission disabling indication information, information indicating to enable or disable the aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0106, “If 815 is performed and the joint communication mode is determined, then optionally 820 may be performed to label the data that is to be forwarded as part of a joint communication (and, if the data has been split, which portion of the split data is being forwarded by the cooperating ED 110b). Such labeling of the forwarded data may help the BS 170 to reassemble the data from the multiple joint communications. The ability of the cooperating ED 110b to label the data in this manner may require the cooperating ED 110b to be provided with information about the type of data in the joint communication (e.g., duplicated data or split data). Such information may be provided to the cooperating ED 110b by a control signal received from the BS 170 (e.g., the signal 605 in the data flow of FIG. 6A) or a signal received from the assisted ED 110a (e.g., the signal 655 in the data flow of FIG. 6B)”, Message 605 may include information to label (or indicate) that split data transmission occurs.], transmission proportion information, and transmitted data volume distribution information. As per claim 4, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 1. Xu et al. also teach further comprising: sending the second sub-data to the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).]. As per claim 5, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 1. Xu et al. also teach further comprising: sending response information of the first indication information to the access network device [Xu, ¶ 0077, “FIG. 6A illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the BS 170. The BS 170 transmits a signal 605 (e.g., control signal, such as a radio resource control (RRC) signal and/or a downlink control information (DCI) message) to the assisted ED 110a”, RRC messages work on a request-response basis, so the BS would receive a response from the UE.]. As per claim 6, Xu et al. teach a communication method, comprising: sending first indication information to a first terminal, wherein the first indication information indicates to enable or disable aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0077, “FIG. 6A is described first. FIG. 6A illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the BS 170. The BS 170 transmits a signal 605 (e.g., control signal, such as a radio resource control (RRC) signal and/or a downlink control information (DCI) message) to the assisted ED 110a, and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b, to indicate the mode of cooperation (e.g., relay mode or joint communication mode) to be used”, Fig. 6 shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 605 is received from the BS (see element 170, or network access device).], the aggregated transmission comprises first data transmission performed with an access network device through the first terminal and a second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0077, “If the joint communication mode is indicated, the signal 605 may further indicate whether data duplication or data splitting should be used. The BS 170 may, for example, determine which mode of cooperation to be used based on detected channel conditions (e.g., measured channel quality between the BS 170 and the assisted ED 110a and/or feedback information received from the EDs 110), detected mobility of the assisted ED 110a, or other factors. The BS 170 may further indicate which ED should be used as the cooperating ED 110b (e.g., based on which ED has better channel conditions) and may include indication of one or more preferred cooperating EDs 110b in the signal 605”, Messaging to indicate the cooperation mode may be seen as enabling/disabling (see ¶ 0049) the cooperation (aggregated) transmission.], the first data comprises first sub-data and second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).], the first sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the first terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).], and the second sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071).]; and receiving response information associated with the first indication information from the first terminal [Xu, ¶ 0049, “the coordination of ED cooperation (e.g., enabling/disabling of cooperation mode and/or selection of the type of cooperation) may be via a control signal from the BS and/or the assisted ED. The control signal may be a lower layer signal (e.g., a physical layer or L1 signal) and/or a higher layer signal (e.g., a logical link control (LLC) signal)”, Control signalling is used to enable/disable cooperation mode signalling.]. As per claim 9, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 6. Xu et al. also teach further comprising: receiving second indication information from a core network device [Xu, ¶ 0077, “If the joint communication mode is indicated, the signal 605 may further indicate whether data duplication or data splitting should be used. The BS 170 may, for example, determine which mode of cooperation to be used based on detected channel conditions (e.g., measured channel quality between the BS 170 and the assisted ED 110a and/or feedback information received from the EDs 110), detected mobility of the assisted ED 110a, or other factors. The BS 170 may further indicate which ED should be used as the cooperating ED 110b (e.g., based on which ED has better channel conditions) and may include indication of one or more preferred cooperating EDs 110b in the signal 605”, Messaging to indicate the cooperation mode may be seen as enabling/disabling (see ¶ 0049) the cooperation (aggregated) transmission. Enabling messaging is coupled with disabling messaging. The core network provides the EDs with services (see ¶ 0058).], wherein the second indication information indicates to enable or disable the aggregated transmission; and determining the first indication information based on the second indication information [Xu, ¶ 0077, “If the joint communication mode is indicated, the signal 605 may further indicate whether data duplication or data splitting should be used. The BS 170 may, for example, determine which mode of cooperation to be used based on detected channel conditions (e.g., measured channel quality between the BS 170 and the assisted ED 110a and/or feedback information received from the EDs 110), detected mobility of the assisted ED 110a, or other factors. The BS 170 may further indicate which ED should be used as the cooperating ED 110b (e.g., based on which ED has better channel conditions) and may include indication of one or more preferred cooperating EDs 110b in the signal 605”, Messaging to indicate the cooperation mode may be seen as enabling/disabling (see ¶ 0049) the cooperation (aggregated) transmission.]. As per claim 10, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 6. Xu et al. also teach wherein the first indication information further comprises first sub-indication information indicating a manner of distributing the first data into the first sub-data and the second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0139, “FIG. 12A shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the PDCP layer. Each portion is then separately processed in the radio link control (RLC), MAC and PHY layers. FIG. 12B shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the MAC layer. FIG. 12C shows an example in which data is split into two portions at the PHY layer. The method in which data is split may impact the ease of reassembling the data at the destination (e.g., at the BS 170). In some examples, the method for splitting data may be specified when the mode of cooperation is indicated (e.g., as part of the signal 605 or 655 described above), may be preconfigured (e.g., using RRC signaling, or defined in standards), may be selected by the data source (e.g., at the assisted ED 110a), may be selected dynamically”, Data splitting information used for cooperation mode be indicated in the network signal.]. As per claim 11, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 6. Xu et al. also teach further comprising: sending third indication information to the second terminal, wherein the third indication information indicates to enable or disable the aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0077, “FIG. 6A is described first. FIG. 6A illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the BS 170. The BS 170 transmits a signal 605 (e.g., control signal, such as a radio resource control (RRC) signal and/or a downlink control information (DCI) message) to the assisted ED 110a, and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b, to indicate the mode of cooperation (e.g., relay mode or joint communication mode) to be used”, Fig. 6 shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 605 is received from the BS (see element 170, or network access device). The third indication is message 605 to the cooperating ED (element 110b), where the first indication is to the assisted ED (element 110a).]. As per claim 12, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 11. Xu et al. also teach wherein the third indication information further comprises third sub-indication information indicating a manner of distributing the first data into the first sub-data and/or the second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0106, “If 815 is performed and the joint communication mode is determined, then optionally 820 may be performed to label the data that is to be forwarded as part of a joint communication (and, if the data has been split, which portion of the split data is being forwarded by the cooperating ED 110b). Such labeling of the forwarded data may help the BS 170 to reassemble the data from the multiple joint communications. The ability of the cooperating ED 110b to label the data in this manner may require the cooperating ED 110b to be provided with information about the type of data in the joint communication (e.g., duplicated data or split data). Such information may be provided to the cooperating ED 110b by a control signal received from the BS 170 (e.g., the signal 605 in the data flow of FIG. 6A) or a signal received from the assisted ED 110a (e.g., the signal 655 in the data flow of FIG. 6B)”, Message 605 may include information to label (or indicate) that split data transmission occurs. The third information to the cooperating ED informs it how to handle the split data from a PDCP perspective.]. As per claim 13, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 11. Xu et al. also teach wherein the third indication information comprises at least one of: aggregated-transmission enabling indication information, aggregated-transmission disabling indication information, information indicating to enable or disable the aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0106, “If 815 is performed and the joint communication mode is determined, then optionally 820 may be performed to label the data that is to be forwarded as part of a joint communication (and, if the data has been split, which portion of the split data is being forwarded by the cooperating ED 110b). Such labeling of the forwarded data may help the BS 170 to reassemble the data from the multiple joint communications. The ability of the cooperating ED 110b to label the data in this manner may require the cooperating ED 110b to be provided with information about the type of data in the joint communication (e.g., duplicated data or split data). Such information may be provided to the cooperating ED 110b by a control signal received from the BS 170 (e.g., the signal 605 in the data flow of FIG. 6A) or a signal received from the assisted ED 110a (e.g., the signal 655 in the data flow of FIG. 6B)”, Message 605 may include information to label (or indicate) that split data transmission occurs.], transmission proportion information, and transmitted data volume distribution information. As per claim 14, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 11. Xu et al. also teach wherein determining the first indication information comprises: determining the first indication information and the third indication information [Xu, ¶ 0077, “FIG. 6A is described first. FIG. 6A illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the BS 170. The BS 170 transmits a signal 605 (e.g., control signal, such as a radio resource control (RRC) signal and/or a downlink control information (DCI) message) to the assisted ED 110a, and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b, to indicate the mode of cooperation (e.g., relay mode or joint communication mode) to be used”, Fig. 6 shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 605 is received from the BS (see element 170, or network access device). The third indication is message 605 to the cooperating ED (element 110b), where the first indication is to the assisted ED (element 110a). Message 605 is determined by the BS to include the first and third information.]. As per claim 15, Xu et al. teach a communication method, comprising: sending second indication information to an access network device [Xu, ¶ 0084, “FIG. 6B is now described. FIG. 6B illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the assisted ED 110a. FIG. 6B is similar to FIG. 6A, with the difference that instead of the BS 170 transmitting the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a instead transmits a signal 655 to indicate the mode of cooperation to the BS 170 and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b. The signal 655 to the cooperating ED 110b may be, for example, a sidelink control information (SCI) message and/or a sidelink physical layer (PC5) RRC signal, and/or in the form of a packet over the SL interface. The signal 655 to the BS 170 may be, for example, over a direct link to the BS 170 such as in a Uu RRC, a media access control (MAC) control element (CE), over the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or over the physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH)”, Fig. 6B shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 655 is received by the BS (see element 170, or network access device) and the cooperating ED (see element 110b). SCI includes the sub-information needed.], wherein the second indication information indicates to enable or disable aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0087, “Other signals shown in FIG. 6B are similar to those discussed with respect to FIG. 6A, and will not be repeated here. Similar to the example of FIG. 6A, in the example of FIG. 6B the scheduling signal 610 may be optional. If the scheduling signal 610 is not sent, the assisted ED 110a and the cooperating ED 110b may use a pre-configured grant (e.g., pre-configured scheduling information) to enable cooperation mode, including both the relay and joint communication modes. Similar to the data flow of FIG. 6A, the signal 655 may only need to be transmitted to enable and/or switch the mode of cooperation”, The access device (BS 170) responds with a schedule for UL transmission (see message 610). As noted, Fig. 6B may carry similar messaging as Fig. 6A. In addition, enabling/disabling messaging is used (see also ¶ 0049).], the aggregated transmission comprises first data transmission performed with the access network device through a first terminal and a second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0081, “In joint communication mode, the shared data (either duplicated data or a portion of the split data) is transmitted UL, over the Uu interface, from the cooperating ED 110b to the BS 170 (620). A joint UL transmission of data (625) (either the duplicated data or another portion of the split data) is performed by the assisted ED 110a and/or optionally by another cooperating ED 110b (not shown). The BS 170 receives the jointly transmitted data and processes the data accordingly. For example, if data splitting was performed, the BS 170 may identify the portions of data (e.g., using information contained in headers associated with the data) and reassemble the portions in order to recover the complete data”, Messages 620 and 625 represent the split data used in joint communication mode. The assisted ED (first terminal) and the cooperating ED (second terminal) jointly perform data transmission (see also ¶s 0046 and 0071). Paragraph [0087] notes that joint transmission messaging/procedures may be borrowed from Fig. 6A and used in Fig. 6B.], the first data comprises first sub-data and second sub-data [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071). Paragraph [0087] notes that joint transmission messaging/procedures may be borrowed from Fig. 6A and used in Fig. 6B.], the first sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the first terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071). Paragraph [0087] notes that joint transmission messaging/procedures may be borrowed from Fig. 6A and used in Fig. 6B.], and the second sub-data is transmitted to the access network device through the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0080, “Receipt of the signal 605 by the assisted ED 110a causes the assisted ED 110a to perform operations in accordance with the indicated mode of cooperation. If the joint communication mode is indicated by the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a may perform data duplication or data splitting, and share the duplicated or a portion of the split data with the cooperating ED 110b over a SL (615)”, Data splitting indication means that the assisted ED (first terminal) splits the first data into first sub-data and second sub-data. The first sub-data is transmitted through (from) the assisted ED over the Uu interface (message 625). The second sub-data is transmitted from the assisted ED to the cooperating ED via the SL interface, and the cooperating ED then sends the second sub-data to the BS via its own Uu interface (message 620). See also fig. 5A, ¶s 0046 and 0071). Paragraph [0087] notes that joint transmission messaging/procedures may be borrowed from Fig. 6A and used in Fig. 6B.]; and receiving response information of the second indication information from the access network device [Xu, ¶ 0087, “Other signals shown in FIG. 6B are similar to those discussed with respect to FIG. 6A, and will not be repeated here. Similar to the example of FIG. 6A, in the example of FIG. 6B the scheduling signal 610 may be optional. If the scheduling signal 610 is not sent, the assisted ED 110a and the cooperating ED 110b may use a pre-configured grant (e.g., pre-configured scheduling information) to enable cooperation mode, including both the relay and joint communication modes. Similar to the data flow of FIG. 6A, the signal 655 may only need to be transmitted to enable and/or switch the mode of cooperation”, The access device (BS 170) responds with a schedule for UL transmission (see message 610). As noted, Fig. 6B may carry similar messaging as Fig. 6A. In addition, enabling/disabling messaging is used (see also ¶ 0049).]. As per claim 16, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 15. Xu et al. also teach wherein the second indication information comprises at least one of: aggregated-transmission enabling indication information, aggregated-transmission disabling indication information, information indicating to enable or disable the aggregated transmission [Xu, ¶ 0106, “If 815 is performed and the joint communication mode is determined, then optionally 820 may be performed to label the data that is to be forwarded as part of a joint communication (and, if the data has been split, which portion of the split data is being forwarded by the cooperating ED 110b). Such labeling of the forwarded data may help the BS 170 to reassemble the data from the multiple joint communications. The ability of the cooperating ED 110b to label the data in this manner may require the cooperating ED 110b to be provided with information about the type of data in the joint communication (e.g., duplicated data or split data). Such information may be provided to the cooperating ED 110b by a control signal received from the BS 170 (e.g., the signal 605 in the data flow of FIG. 6A) or a signal received from the assisted ED 110a (e.g., the signal 655 in the data flow of FIG. 6B)”, Message 605 may include information to label (or indicate) that split data transmission occurs.], transmission proportion information, and transmitted data volume distribution information. As per claim 19, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 15. Xu et al. also teach wherein the second indication information further comprises second sub-indication information used to determine the first terminal and/or the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0084, “FIG. 6B is now described. FIG. 6B illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the assisted ED 110a. FIG. 6B is similar to FIG. 6A, with the difference that instead of the BS 170 transmitting the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a instead transmits a signal 655 to indicate the mode of cooperation to the BS 170 and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b. The signal 655 to the cooperating ED 110b may be, for example, a sidelink control information (SCI) message and/or a sidelink physical layer (PC5) RRC signal, and/or in the form of a packet over the SL interface. The signal 655 to the BS 170 may be, for example, over a direct link to the BS 170 such as in a Uu RRC, a media access control (MAC) control element (CE), over the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or over the physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH)”, Fig. 6B shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 655 is received by the BS (see element 170, or network access device) and the cooperating ED (see element 110b). SCI includes the sub-information needed.], and the second sub-indication information comprises a correspondence between the first terminal and the second terminal [Xu, ¶ 0084, “FIG. 6B is now described. FIG. 6B illustrates a set of data flows in which a mode of cooperation is initiated by the assisted ED 110a. FIG. 6B is similar to FIG. 6A, with the difference that instead of the BS 170 transmitting the signal 605, the assisted ED 110a instead transmits a signal 655 to indicate the mode of cooperation to the BS 170 and optionally to the cooperating ED 110b. The signal 655 to the cooperating ED 110b may be, for example, a sidelink control information (SCI) message and/or a sidelink physical layer (PC5) RRC signal, and/or in the form of a packet over the SL interface. The signal 655 to the BS 170 may be, for example, over a direct link to the BS 170 such as in a Uu RRC, a media access control (MAC) control element (CE), over the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or over the physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH)”, Fig. 6B shows a message flow for setup of a joint communication mode (see also fig. 5A, ¶ 0071). Message 655 is received by the BS (see element 170, or network access device) and the cooperating ED (see element 110b). SCI includes the sub-information needed.]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 7, 8, 17, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0037601) in view of Huawei (NPL, RWS-210451, see PTO-892). As per claim 7, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 6. Xu et al. do not explicitly teach further comprising: determining the first indication information based on first information, wherein the first information comprises one or more of: quality of service information, data transmission rate information, buffer status information, channel quality information, or terminal capability information. However, in an analogous art, Huawei teaches further comprising: determining the first indication information based on first information, wherein the first information comprises one or more of: quality of service information, data transmission rate information, buffer status information, channel quality information, or terminal capability information [Huawei, section 2, Observation 1, “Observation 1:One of the key factors for uplink performance is the transmit power limitation of the terminal. There could be different approaches to resolve the uplink power limitation problem. One way is to increase the max transmit power in uplink, for example from 23 dBm to 26 dBm. However that will bring more cost for the terminals. Another alternative would be to aggregate more terminals (UEs) together to harvest the aggregated capability including transmit power, MIMO, CA etc. The benefit for this approach as compared with the previous one is not only the cost, but also the flexibility, as the terminals could be aggregated on need basis. In normal circumstance”, Ther aggregation method is determined based on terminal power capability (or a threshold limitation to terminal capabilities). The aggregation method configures UE aggregation at the SUE and CUE (see fig. 1) using criteria and parameters (see pg. 3, Observation 3). The method further uses L2 functions to enable the data splitting for the Uu and SL paths (see pg. 3, Observation 3).]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include elements of the UE aggregation method of Huawei into Xu et al. One would have been motivated to do this because enabling UE aggregation based on terminal capabilities as taught by Huawei allows for improvement of aggregation and data splitting parameters (see Huawei, Proposal 1) with a reasonable expectation of success. As per claim 8, Xu et al. in view of Huawei teach the method according to claim 7. Xu et al. do not explicitly teach wherein determining the first indication information based on the first information comprises: determining the first indication information based on the first information and threshold information corresponding to the first information. However, in an analogous art, Huawei teaches wherein determining the first indication information based on the first information comprises: determining the first indication information based on the first information and threshold information corresponding to the first information [Huawei, section 2, Observation 1, “Observation 1:One of the key factors for uplink performance is the transmit power limitation of the terminal. There could be different approaches to resolve the uplink power limitation problem. One way is to increase the max transmit power in uplink, for example from 23 dBm to 26 dBm. However that will bring more cost for the terminals. Another alternative would be to aggregate more terminals (UEs) together to harvest the aggregated capability including transmit power, MIMO, CA etc. The benefit for this approach as compared with the previous one is not only the cost, but also the flexibility, as the terminals could be aggregated on need basis. In normal circumstance”, Ther aggregation method is determined based on terminal power capability (or a threshold limitation to terminal capabilities). The aggregation method configures UE aggregation at the SUE and CUE (see fig. 1) using criteria and parameters (see pg. 3, Observation 3). The method further uses L2 functions to enable the data splitting for the Uu and SL paths (see pg. 3, Observation 3).]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include elements of the UE aggregation method of Huawei into Xu et al. One would have been motivated to do this because enabling UE aggregation based on terminal capabilities as taught by Huawei allows for improvement of aggregation and data splitting parameters (see Huawei, Proposal 1) with a reasonable expectation of success. As per claim 17, Xu et al. teach the method according to claim 15. Xu et al. do not explicitly teach further comprising: determining the second indication information based on second information, wherein the second information comprises one or more of: quality of service information, data transmission rate information, buffer status information, channel quality information, application layer feedback information, or terminal capability information. However, in an analogous art, Huawei teaches further comprising: determining the second indication information based on second information, wherein the second information comprises one or more of: quality of service information, data transmission rate information, buffer status information, channel quality information, application layer feedback information, or terminal capability information [Huawei, section 2, Observation 1, “Observation 1:One of the key factors for uplink performance is the transmit power limitation of the terminal. There could be different approaches to resolve the uplink power limitation problem. One way is to increase the max transmit power in uplink, for example from 23 dBm to 26 dBm. However that will bring more cost for the terminals. Another alternative would be to aggregate more terminals (UEs) together to harvest the aggregated capability including transmit power, MIMO, CA etc. The benefit for this approach as compared with the previous one is not only the cost, but also the flexibility, as the terminals could be aggregated on need basis. In normal circumstance”, Ther aggregation method is determined based on terminal power capability (or a threshold limitation to terminal capabilities). The aggregation method configures UE aggregation at the SUE and CUE (see fig. 1) using criteria and parameters (see pg. 3, Observation 3). The method further uses L2 functions to enable the data splitting for the Uu and SL paths (see pg. 3, Observation 3).]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include elements of the UE aggregation method of Huawei into Xu et al. One would have been motivated to do this because enabling UE aggregation based on terminal capabilities as taught by Huawei allows for improvement of aggregation and data splitting parameters (see Huawei, Proposal 1) with a reasonable expectation of success. As per claim 18, Xu et al. in view of Huawei teach the method according to claim 17. Xu et al. do not explicitly teach wherein determining the second indication information based on the second information comprises: determining the second indication information based on the second information and threshold information, wherein the threshold information comprises a threshold corresponding to the second information. However, in an analogous art, Huawei teaches wherein determining the first indication information based on the first information comprises: determining the first indication information based on the first information and threshold information corresponding to the first information [Huawei, section 2, Observation 1, “Observation 1:One of the key factors for uplink performance is the transmit power limitation of the terminal. There could be different approaches to resolve the uplink power limitation problem. One way is to increase the max transmit power in uplink, for example from 23 dBm to 26 dBm. However that will bring more cost for the terminals. Another alternative would be to aggregate more terminals (UEs) together to harvest the aggregated capability including transmit power, MIMO, CA etc. The benefit for this approach as compared with the previous one is not only the cost, but also the flexibility, as the terminals could be aggregated on need basis. In normal circumstance”, Ther aggregation method is determined based on terminal power capability (or a threshold limitation to terminal capabilities). The aggregation method configures UE aggregation at the SUE and CUE (see fig. 1) using criteria and parameters (see pg. 3, Observation 3). The method further uses L2 functions to enable the data splitting for the Uu and SL paths (see pg. 3, Observation 3).]. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include elements of the UE aggregation method of Huawei into Xu et al. One would have been motivated to do this because enabling UE aggregation based on terminal capabilities as taught by Huawei allows for improvement of aggregation and data splitting parameters (see Huawei, Proposal 1) with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The reference, Huawei et al. (NPL, RP-191011, see PTO-892), teaches NR SL assisted Uu communications/data transmission (see section 2.2). The reference, CMCC (NPL, RWS-210354, see PTO-892), outlines the goals of a UE aggregation study. The reference, CMCC (NPL, RWS-210355, see PTO-892), outlines the goals of a UE aggregation study. The reference, Cao et al. (US 20230164772), teaches joint scheduling of sidelink and a Uu link (see figs. 6 and 7). The reference, Xie et al. (WO 2023020378), teaches multi-UE data aggregation (see fig. 2). The reference, Liu (WO 2022057825), teaches an aggregation method using a sidelink (see fig. 2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Paul H. Masur whose telephone number is (571)270-7297. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 4:30 AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rebecca Song can be reached at (571) 270-3667. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Paul H. Masur/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2417
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763904
RADIO ACCESS NETWORK SPLITS FOR REDUCED RADIO UNIT COMPLEXITY
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750108
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CSI REPORTING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744585
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745296
SENSING SESSION ESTABLISHMENT METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744564
SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SCHEDULING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 688 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month