Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/756,229

COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 18, 2015 — RE 10-2015-0181747 +3 more
Examiner
LIAN, MANG TIN BIK
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
933 granted / 1330 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
1401
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
91.7%
+51.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1330 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species II, FIG. 5 and claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 05/13/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 15/228,511, filed on August 04, 2016. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/27/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings received on 06/27/2024 are acceptable. Claim Objections Claims 1-12 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1, the claim should end with a period, not a comma. Claims 2-12 are objected as being directly or indirectly dependent on claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ohkubo et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2016/0351316 A1, hereinafter “Ohkubo”). With respect to claim 1, Ohkubo teaches a coil component 1 (Figs. 1-6) comprising: a body part 10 including a magnetic material; a coil part 13 and 11 disposed in the body part; and an electrode part 30A and or 30B disposed on the body part, wherein the coil part includes: a supporting member 11, a coil conductor 14 disposed on at least one surface (upper and or lower surface) of the supporting member and having a conductor pattern 14A of a planar coil shape, and an insulating film 18, 40 and 41 filling a space surrounded by the conductor pattern, and covering outermost side surfaces (peripheral surfaces) and top surface (upper surface) of the conductor pattern, wherein the space surrounded by the conductor pattern has no magnetic material therein, and wherein H2/W2 is between 10 and 25, where H2 is a height of the insulating film and W2 is a width of the insulating film (paras. [0029], [0038], [0040] and [0046]).[[,]] PNG media_image1.png 494 469 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein H2 is 220 µm or more and 250 µm or less (para. [0040]). With respect to claim 3, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein H1/W1 is between 3 and 9, where H1 is a height of the conductor pattern and W1 is a width of the conductor pattern (para. [0040]). With respect to claim 4, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 3, wherein H1 is 200 µm or more and 260 µm or less (para. [0040]). With respect to claim 5, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein the conductor pattern has a side surface which is in contact with the insulating wall (para. [0038]). With respect to claim 6, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 5, wherein the insulating film extends to be in contact with at least one surface of the supporting member, and thickness of the insulating film in contact with the side surface of the conductor pattern is substantially same as thickness of the insulating film in contact with the supporting member (para. [0040]). With respect to claim 7, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein the conductor pattern includes a plurality of turns, the insulating film fills spaces between adjacent turns of the plurality of turns, respectively, and the spaces between adjacent turns of the plurality of turns have no magnetic material therein (para. [0040]). With respect to claim 8, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein the conductor pattern includes a seed layer 14a disposed on a surface of the supporting member, and a plating layer 14b formed on the seed layer (para. [0038]). With respect to claim 9, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1, wherein the supporting member includes a glass fiber and an insulating resin (para. [0031]). With respect to claim 10, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 3, wherein the coil part includes the supporting member 11, a first coil conductor (coil conductor 14 on upper side of the supporting member) disposed on a first surface of the supporting member and having a first conductor pattern 14A of a planar coil shape, a second coil conductor (coil conductor 14 on lower side of the supporting member) disposed on a second surface of the supporting member opposing the first surface thereof and having a second conductor pattern 14A of a planar coil shape, a first insulating film 18, 40 and 41 filling a space surrounded by the first conductor pattern, and covering outermost side surface and top surface of the first conductor pattern, a second insulating film 18, 40 and 41 filling a space surrounded by the second conductor pattern, and covering outermost side surface and top surface of the second conductor pattern, H11/W11 is between 3 to 9, where H11 is a height of the first conductor pattern and W11 is a width of the first conductor pattern, and H12/W12 is between 3 to 9, where H12 is a height of the second conductor pattern and W12 is a width of the second conductor pattern (paras. [0032], [0038] and [0040]). With respect to claim 11, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 10, wherein the coil part further includes a through via (“via” para. [0035]) penetrating through the supporting member and connecting the first and second coil conductors (para. [0035]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohkubo, as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Nakamura et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2015/0035634 A1, hereinafter “Nakamura”). With respect to claim 12, Ohkubo teaches the coil component of claim 1. Ohkubo does not expressly teach the insulating film includes at least one selected from the group consisting of an epoxy resin, a polyimide resin, and a liquid crystal crystalline polymer resin. Nakamura teaches a coil component 1 (FIGs. 1A-2), wherein the insulating film 41 includes at least one selected from the group consisting of an epoxy resin, a polyimide resin, and a liquid crystal crystalline polymer resin (para. [0053]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have use epoxy resin wall as taught by Nakamura to the coil component of Ohkubo to provide the desired bonding characteristics to meet design requirements. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANGTIN LIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 0800-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S. Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG TIN BIK LIAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683063
INDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665118
INDUCTOR COMPONENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12633450
INTEGRATED QUAD-CORE TRANSFORMER WITH ASYMMETRIC GAP DISTRIBUTION FOR MAGNETIC FLUX BALANCING
5y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626851
HIGH FREQUENCY INTEGRATED PLANAR MAGNETICS FOR A BIDIRECTIONAL AC TO DC CLLC RESONANT CONVERTER
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620521
Coil and Method for Producing A Coil
4y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month