Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/756,264

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — JP 2021-214489 +1 more
Examiner
HOWARD, RYAN D
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
819 granted / 1028 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1048
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1028 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 30 and 31, the limitation ‘set a second projection center of the virtual projection apparatus in the virtual projection surface in a case where the shift of the projection position is not performed, based on the disposition change data’ is indefinite inasmuch as the limitation sets a second projection center of the virtual projection apparatus based on the case where the shift of the projection position is both not performed and performed. That is, the ‘disposition change data’ includes changing a position of the virtual projection apparatus in the ‘acquire disposition change data’ step immediately prior to the set a second projection center step. For the purpose of examination the ‘based on the disposition change data’ at the end of the ‘set a second projection center’ step, will be interpreted as ‘based on the disposition data’ instead of the ‘disposition change data’. Examiner believes this interpretation is more consistent with the specification in paragraphs 0209-0214 (see USPGPub of this application). Claims 2-29 are rejected inasmuch as they depend from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 30 and 31 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, closest prior art is Nishizaki (JP 2014-56044A), which teaches a disposition data related to a disposition of a virtual projection surface (figure 12a and 12b) and a virtual projector (figures 13a-13b) in a space indicated by the first image; Acquiring disposition change data including data for giving an instruction to change a position of the virtual projection apparatus (figure 13). Nishizaki does not teach changing a position of the first projection center of the virtual projection apparatus on the virtual projection surface due to a shift of a projection position of the virtual projection apparatus; nor setting a second projection center of the virtual projection apparatus on the virtual projection surface in a case where the shift of the projection position is not performed…’ Claims 2-29 contain allowable subject matter at least inasmuch as they depend from claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN D HOWARD whose telephone number is (571)270-5358. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 5712722303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN D HOWARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882 7/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704772
PROJECTION METHOD AND PROJECTION SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699310
VIBRATION GENERATION DEVICE, VIBRATION REDUCTION DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689714
PROJECTION SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD FOR PROJECTION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681374
FLUORESCENCE EMITTING ELEMENT, FLUORESCENCE EMITTING MODULE, AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681319
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1028 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month