Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/756,300

DEVICE FOR STORING EVERYDAY OBJECTS AND A MUSIC MODULE FOR AN EVERYDAY OBJECT

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Jul 03, 2023 — CN 202321721458.7
Examiner
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tradaris Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
171 granted / 575 resolved
-40.3% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
614
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.5%
+53.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3-8, 11-12 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Timm (US 8,309,831) in view of Vaught (US 5,345,153). Regarding claims 1 and 16, Timm (figs. 1-7) discloses a device (capable of storing everyday objects, in particular, a jewelry box or a treasure chest) comprising: a base body 26 comprising at least one storage space 46 and at least one base-body opening 26, a closure body 26 for closing the at least one base body-opening 26, at least one music module 24, the at least one music module 24 comprising at least one loudspeaker 94 on the base body, an electronic unit 76. Timm fails to disclose: the at least one loudspeaker 94 on the base body for converting audio signals of at least two music tracks into audible soundwaves, and the electronic unit 76 which providing audio signals of the at least two music tracks to the at least one loudspeaker, and a motor for actuating a toy figure, the motor arranged on or in the base body, wherein the electronic unit is designed to activate the motor when the closure body is at least partially distanced from the base-body opening, and wherein the motor causes the toy figure to rotate when the at least one loudspeaker emits audible soundwaves for one of the at least two music tracks. However, Vaught teaches a closure activating audio signals of at least two music tracks into audible soundwaves, and a motor for actuating a toy figure 46, the motor arranged in a base body, wherein an electronic unit is designed to activate the motor when the closure body is at least partially distanced from the base-body opening, and wherein the motor causes the toy figure to rotate when the at least one loudspeaker emits audible soundwaves for one of the at least two music tracks or melodies (fig. 1 and col. 1, lines 60-68). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to combine the electronic unit 76 of Timm with the lid-actuated pop-up display with at least two music tracks or melodies, as taught by Vaught, to provide enhancement in user experience. Regarding claims 3-4, Timm further discloses at least one light sensor 90 wherein, with the aid of least one sensor 90, the electronic unit detects that the closure body 28 is at least partially distanced from the base body opening(col. 5, lines 59-67). Regarding claim 5, Timm further discloses the closure body 28 being a hinged closure lid which is connected to the base body 26 on one side of the closure lid (fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, Timm further discloses a display or photograph being arranged on the closure lid (col. 3, lines15-17). Regarding claim 7, the modified Timm further discloses at least one storage device in which at least two music tracks can be stored, wherein at least one storage device is connected to the electronic unit for the exchange of music data (col. 1, lines 41-44 of Vaught). Regarding claim 8, Timm further discloses the at least one storage device comprises a memory-card receptacle for holding an external memory card (col. 6, lines 10-29). Regarding claim 11, Timm further discloses a power supply 64 which is connected to the electronic unit, wherein the power supply is capable of being connected to an external power supply (fig. 7). Regarding claim 12, it is noted that the power supply 64 of the modified Timm is capable of being connected to an external power supply by means of a USB port (fig. 7). Claims 1 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Song (US 2001/0011495) in view of Vaught (US 5,345,153). Regarding claim 1, Song (figs. 1-3) discloses a device (capable of storing everyday objects, in particular, a jewelry box or a treasure chest) comprising: a base body 14 comprising at least one storage space 18 and at least one base-body opening, a closure body 12 for closing the at least one base body-opening, at least one music module 100, the at least one music module 100 comprising at least one loudspeaker 120 on the base body, an electronic unit 112. Song fails to disclose: the at least one loudspeaker 94 on the base body for converting audio signals of at least two music tracks into audible soundwaves, and the electronic unit 76 which providing audio signals of the at least two music tracks to the at least one loudspeaker, and a motor for actuating a toy figure, the motor arranged on or in the base body, wherein the electronic unit is designed to activate the motor when the closure body is at least partially distanced from the base-body opening, and wherein the motor causes the toy figure to rotate when the at least one loudspeaker emits audible soundwaves for one of the at least two music tracks. However, Vaught teaches a closure activating audio signals of at least two music tracks into audible soundwaves, and a motor for actuating a toy figure 46, the motor arranged in a base body, wherein an electronic unit is designed to activate the motor when the closure body is at least partially distanced from the base-body opening, and wherein the motor causes the toy figure to rotate when the at least one loudspeaker emits audible soundwaves for one of the at least two music tracks or melodies (fig. 1 and col. 1, lines 60-68). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to combine the electronic unit 112 of Song with the lid-actuated pop-up display with at least two music tracks or melodies, as taught by Vaught, to provide enhancement in user experience. Regarding claim 9, Song further discloses an operating device 116 by means of which at least two pieces of music can be selected (fig. 2). Regarding claim 10, Song further discloses a button 114 used to adjust the volume (fig. 2). Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Timm (US 8,309,831) in view of Vaught (US 5,345,153) as applied to claim 1 above, further in view of Walker (US 2008/0247278). Regarding claims 13 and 14, the modified Timm discloses all elements of the claimed invention as applied to claim 1 above, but fails to disclose a WLAN module and a Bluetooth module which is connected to the electronic unit. However, Walker teaches a housing 200 having a having electrical and software components such as WLSN and Bluetooth (paragraph 0048). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to incorporate Bluethooth and WLAN into the jewelry box of the modified Timm, as taught by Walker, to enable wireless control and interacted with external devices. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. While Timm and Song do not teach the newly added limitation, newly applied reference Vaught teaches the limitation added by amendment. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BLAINE GIRMA NEWAY whose telephone number is (571)270-5275. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 AM- 5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at 571-272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BLAINE G NEWAY/Examiner, Art Unit 3735 /Anthony D Stashick/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623820
Container Cap and Method of Piercing a Seal Covering an Opening of a Container
6y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12359771
PRESSURE TANK
5y 12m to grant Granted Jul 15, 2025
Patent 12274669
ADMINISTRATION METHODS FOR ORAL MEDICATIONS
9y 1m to grant Granted Apr 15, 2025
Patent 12269673
FREIGHT CONTAINER INTENDED TO BE RECEIVED IN THE CARGO HOLD OF AN AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 08, 2025
Patent 12179963
GASKETLESS CLOSURE FOR OPEN-TOP PAILS
3y 2m to grant Granted Dec 31, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+40.6%)
4y 0m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month