Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/756,319

JEWELRY MODULE IN WHICH A RIGID STRUCTURE WITH FEW PARTS IS OBTAINED

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2023 — TÜ 2023/012167 +1 more
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Can KOÇHISARLI)
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1176 granted / 1800 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1832
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1800 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: in line 5, “half-mon” should be “half-moon”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 12 and any claim that depends therefrom, lines 13-15, are misdescriptive. The claims are directed to two parts of a jewelry assembly comprising a first module (20) and a second module (11). The limitation that the “half-moon shaped projection abuts the end of the said second module body” is misdescriptive in the scope of the claim. The half-moon shaped projection (12.3), in the context of the claim, is located on an end of the first module opposite the end that comes into contact with the second module. Please see the annotated figure on the subsequent page. Therefore, it is misdescriptive to claim that “wherein the lock striker of said first module body is inserted into the lock slot of said second module body such that the half-moon shaped projection abuts the end of the said second module body”. PNG media_image1.png 424 778 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 13-17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Feb 13, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765649
Jewelry for binding and securing garment articles
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757981
Slider
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757983
CREATIVE ORNAMENT
1y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747746
BUCKLE, ROOF TENT, AND ROOF TRUNK
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740621
POLYESTER-BASED WOVEN HOOK-AND-LOOP FASTENER AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+28.2%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month