Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/756,638

EXTENDIBLE REAR SEAT ARMREST

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Examiner
ABRAHAM, TANIA
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 813 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
845
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: the word "plate" is misspelled, in line 4. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION. —The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the extension plate" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Consequently, it is unclear if this recitation is in error (and should have recited extension mechanism) or if this recitation was intended to further define the structure (with the inclusion of an extension plate). Claim 18 recites the limitation "the extension plate" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Consequently, it is unclear if this recitation is in error (and should have recited extension mechanism) or if this recitation was intended to further define the structure (with the inclusion of an extension plate). Claims 9-17 and 19-20, being dependent upon an indefinite claim in the above rejection(s), is/are indefinite. In light of the above rejections, the claims have been further treated on the merits as best understood. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8, 14 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hoge (DE 10-2006-011994). Claim 8, as best understood- Hoge shows an extendible armrest for a seat structure, comprising: a pivot mechanism (12, 28, 34) configured to be fixed to the seat structure (the figures show a bracket 12 fixed to the seat’s backrest 8 and including pivot points 28, 34); an extension mechanism (30) pivotally connected to the pivot mechanism (figs. 2-3); and an armrest (14) pivotally mounted to the pivot mechanism (via pivot point 18) and extendibly mounted to the extension mechanism (via pivot point 32); wherein the armrest (14) is pivotable from a stowed position (fig. 1) to a first deployed position (fig. 2) and extendible (via link 30) from the first deployed position to a second deployed position (fig. 3) forward of the first deployed position (fig. 3 shows that the forward end of the armrest 14 is closer to the forward end of the sitting cushion 6, than it is in fig. 2). Claim 14- Hoge shows the extendible armrest for a seat structure according to claim 8, wherein the seat structure includes a recess (10) in which the armrest is stowed (the figures show the seat structure includes a backrest 8 with the recess 10). Claim 18, as best understood- Hoge shows an extendible armrest for a seat structure, comprising: a pivot mechanism (12, 28, 34) configured to be fixed to the seat structure (the figures show a bracket 12 fixed to the seat’s backrest 8 and including pivot points 28, 34); an extension mechanism (30) pivotally connected to the pivot mechanism (figs. 2-3); and an armrest (14) pivotally mounted to the pivot mechanism (via pivot point 18) and extendibly mounted to the extension mechanism (via pivot point 32); wherein the armrest (14) is pivotable from a stowed position (fig. 1) to a first deployed position (fig. 2) and extendible (via link 30) from the first deployed position to a second deployed position (fig. 3) forward of the first deployed position (fig. 3 shows that the forward end of the armrest 14 is closer to the forward end of the sitting cushion 6, than it is in fig. 2); and wherein the seat structure includes a recess (10) in which the armrest is stowed (the figures show the seat structure includes a backrest 8 with the recess 10). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 4-7 are allowed. Claims 2 and 3 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the objection(s) set forth in this Office action. Claims 9-13, 15-17 and 19-20 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA ABRAHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-2635. The examiner can normally be reached 9 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID DUNN can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.A./Examiner, Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600280
SEAT SUPPORT ELEMENT COMPRISING AN ADJUSTABLE REST ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599249
ANTI-ROLLOVER STRUCTURE, CARRYING DEVICE AND BABY CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594864
DRAW-IN BAR FOR HOLDING A COVER, COVER FASTENING SYSTEM AND VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594865
ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576757
VEHICLE SEAT, FOR AT LEAST TWO USERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month