Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/756,706

PRINTER, FOOD PRODUCT SCALE AND ASSOCIATED LABEL CASSETTE WITH ADJUSTABLE LABEL STOCK EDGE GUIDE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Examiner
SHENDEROV, ALEXANDER D
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
790 granted / 875 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
890
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 875 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The references cited on a Form PTO 1449 have been considered. Specification The specification has been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. However, the applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 9-10 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (U.S. 2003/0159603 A1). Lee et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding independent Claim 1, a printer (§0006 and Fig. 1), comprising: a media path along which labels are movable (§0006 and Fig. 1); a printhead positioned along the media path; wherein at least a part of the media path includes a side structure (e.g. 6a, §§0006-0015 and Fig. 1) defining a first side of the part of the media path and a media edge guide (e.g. 7a, §§0006-0015 and Fig. 1) for defining a second side of the part of the media path, wherein the media edge guide is movable so as to adjust a spacing between the media edge guide and the side structure for accommodating different media widths; a guide adjustment assembly connected to the media edge guide for providing tool-free manual movement of a position of the media edge guide to adjust the spacing (e.g. 6-9, §§0006-0015 and Figs. 2-3). Regarding Claim 2, wherein the guide adjustment assembly comprises an arrangement that converts a rotation of an adjustment component into a linear movement of the media edge guide (§§0006-0015 and Figs. 2-3). Regarding Claim 9, wherein the guide adjustment assembly comprises a rotatable component (8, §§0007-0015 and Figs. 2-3) defining a helical drive path (8b, §§0007-0015 and Figs. 2-3), wherein the media edge guide includes an edge guide portion (7a, §§0007-0015 and Figs. 2-3) configured for guiding media and a follower portion (7b, §§0007-0015 and Figs. 2-3) engaged with the helical drive path to ride therealong during rotation of the rotatable component forcing the edge guide portion to move along a length of the rotatable component. Regarding Claim 10, wherein the guide adjustment assembly further comprises thumbwheel (9, §§0007-0015 and Figs. 2-3) that is rotatable and operatively connected to the rotatable component such that rotation of the thumbwheel causes rotation of the rotatable component. Regarding Claim 12, wherein the guide adjustment assembly is configured to prevent inadvertent movement of the media edge guide (§§0007-0015 and Figs. 1-3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (U.S. 2003/0159603 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Shiohara (U.S. 2022/0161579 A1). Lee et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 13, all limitations of Claim 1 (from which this Claim depends). Lee et al. do not disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 13, wherein the printer comprises a body with a removable media cassette, wherein the side structure, the media edge guide and the guide adjustment assembly are formed on the media cassette. Shiohara discloses the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 13, wherein the printer comprises a body with a removable media cassette (4, §0047 and Fig. 1), wherein the side structure, the media edge guide and the guide adjustment assembly (4d, 4f, §0097 and Fig. 17) are formed on the media cassette. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to apply the removable media cassette of Shiohara to the printer of Lee et al. to make media replacement more convenient for the user. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (U.S. 2003/0159603 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Monnier et al. (U.S. 2008/0191012 A1). Lee et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 14, all limitations of Claim 1 (from which this Claim depends). Lee et al. do not disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 14, wherein the printer takes the form of a scale that also includes a weigh station for receiving items to be weighed and a load cell for outputting a weight indicative signal. Monnier et al. disclose the following claimed limitations: Regarding Claim 14, wherein the printer takes the form of a scale (10, §0018 and Figs. 1-2) that also includes a weigh station (12, §0018 and Figs. 1-2) for receiving items to be weighed and a load cell for outputting a weight indicative signal (§0018). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to apply the scale of Monnier et al. to the printer of Lee et al. to provide an integrated product, e.g. food, packaging solution. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-17 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the primary reason for allowance of claims 15-17 is the inclusion of the limitations of a printer including a media cassette removable from the printer body, the media cassette comprising: a media path along which labels are movable; wherein at least a part of the media path includes a side structure defining a first side of the part of the media path and a media edge guide for defining a second side of the part of the media path, wherein the media edge guide is movable so as to adjust a spacing between the media edge guide and the side structure for accommodating different media widths; a guide adjustment assembly connected to the media edge guide for providing tool-free manual movement of a position of the media edge guide to adjust the spacing, wherein the guide adjustment assembly comprises a rotatable spring. It is these limitations found in the claims, as they are claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Claims 3-8 and 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claims 3-8 is the inclusion of the limitations of a printer including wherein the guide adjustment assembly comprises a rotatable spring, wherein the media edge guide includes an edge guide portion external of the spring and configured for guiding media and a follower portion engaged with the spring to ride along a length of the spring when the spring is rotated so as to cause movement of the edge guide portion along the length of the spring. It is these limitations found in the claims, as it is claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. The primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claim 11 is the inclusion of the limitations of a printer including wherein thumbwheel includes an axis of rotation offset from a rotation axis of the rotatable component, wherein the thumbwheel is operatively connected to the rotatable component by a further wheel that includes a rotation axis that is aligned with the rotation axis of the rotatable component. It is these limitations found in the claims, as it is claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV whose telephone number is (571)270-7049. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X Rodrigues can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER D SHENDEROV/ Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /JASON S UHLENHAKE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600143
CARTRIDGE AND PRINTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594776
ROLLED PAPER PRINTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594766
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583227
LIQUID CARTRIDGE HAVING STRUCTURE FOR SUPPRESSING LEAKAGE OF LIQUID DEPOSITED ON SEAL AND CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583219
DRIVE UNIT, LIQUID EJECTING HEAD UNIT, AND LIQUID EJECTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.0%)
1y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 875 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month