Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/757,032

PACKAGING UNIT WITH LOCKABLE INNER CARRIER ELEMENT FOR PRODUCTS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Jul 01, 2023 — DE 102023002689.1
Examiner
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Koch Pac-Systeme GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
1121 granted / 1626 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1693
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1626 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12, 14, and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the length thereof" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim; therefore, the metes and bounds of the limitation are not readily understood. Claim 14 recites the limitation "said clamping and positioning sections" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim; therefore, the metes and bounds of the limitation are not readily understood. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the inserted position" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim; therefore, the metes and bounds of the limitation are not readily understood. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the length thereof" in line 11. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim; therefore, the metes and bounds of the limitation are not readily understood. Claim 19 fails to cure the deficiencies. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-8, 10, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Van Oycke et al. (FR 2876082 A1; hereinafter Van Oycke). Regarding claims 1-5, 8, and 17, Van Oycke discloses a container and blanks for making comprising an outer box (1) comprising a floor area (2), two side areas (3), two end faces (5), and two pairs of folding tabs (4), wherein one pair of folding tabs is disposed at each of said two end faces (see Fig. 1), and wherein each folding tab comprises two contact edges abutting a recess (11); and a carrier element (6) disposed in said outer box and configured to releasably hold at least one elongated product and comprising two end face ends (13), two longitudinal edges (8), a floor section (7), a roof section comprising two roof (9; Examiner considers 9 to be a “roof” insofar as it is positioned above the floor of the outer box and also the floor of the carrier element) areas disposed at an angle to one another and projecting away from said floor section (see Fig. 1; Examiner notes that element 9 extends at an obtuse angle relative to the floor), and two pairs of locking tabs (10) disposed one pair at each of said end face ends, wherein each of said locking tabs is engaged with said contact edges of a corresponding one of said folding tabs such that said carrier element is releasably secured to said outer box (see Figures 1-2). Examiner notes that each folding tab of the outer box comprising a plurality of contact edges to allow for an adjustable height for the inserted carrier element. Regarding claims 7 and 10, Van Oycke discloses a container and blanks for making wherein each pair of said locking tabs is connected to a corresponding one of said roof areas and to said floor section. Examiner notes that Van Oycke’s locking tabs are connected to the roof areas, and the roof areas are connected to the floor section. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6, 9, 11-16, and 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE whose telephone number is (571)270-1982. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 am - 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHAN J NEWHOUSE can be reached at (571)272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER R DEMEREE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679595
Container With Denesting Features
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679590
Container With Divider
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673811
A Thermally Insulative Liner for Use in Packaging
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673799
PACKAGING BOX FOR REDUCE VOLUME AND SAFE TRANSPORTATION FOR STORAGE CERAMIC
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668408
Carton For Containers
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month