Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/757,430

ANTI-DRIVING INTERFERENCE POWER MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Examiner
BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Metapwr Electronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
913 granted / 1150 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1187
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1150 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 2, line 3, “a bypass direction of a loop formed by the DC positive terminal, the first switch device, the second switch device and the DC negative terminal” has already been recited in claim 1, so both “a bypass” and “a loop” should have antecedent basis. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Xu (US 2018/0152113). With respect to claim 1, Xu discloses a power module capable of resisting driving interference, comprising at least one half-bridge power module (Fig. 4 60), wherein the at least one half-bridge power module comprises a first switch device (Fig. 1 11), a second switch device (Fig. 1 12), a DC positive terminal (Fig. 1 DC+) and a DC negative terminal (Fig. 1 DC-), the first switch device is electrically connected (Fig. 1 13) with the DC positive terminal, the second switch device is electrically connected (Fig. 1 14) with the DC negative terminal, the first switch device and the second switch device are connected in series to form a half-bridge arm (Fig. 1 11,12), and a middle point (Fig. 1 15) of the bridge arm is led out to be an SW terminal (Fig. 1 AC), wherein the first switch device and the second switch device are arranged on a substrate (Fig. 4 61), wherein the second switch device comprises a second switch body (Fig. 4 68), a second source terminal (Fig. 4 74) and a second gate terminal (Fig. 4 73), wherein a bypass direction of a loop (Fig. 4 counterclockwise loop) formed by the DC positive terminal (Fig. 4 DC+), the first switch device (Fig. 4 65), the second switch device (Fig. 4 68) and the DC negative terminal (Fig. 4 DC-) in sequence is the same as the bypass direction of a loop (Fig. 4 counterclockwise loop) formed by the second source terminal (Fig. 4 74) , the second switch body (Fig. 4 68) and the second gate terminal (Fig. 4 73). With respect to claim 2, Xu discloses the power module of claim 1, wherein the first switch device comprises a first switch body (Fig. 4 65), a first source terminal (Fig. 4 71) and a first gate terminal, wherein a bypass direction of a loop formed by the DC positive terminal, the first switch device, the second switch device and the DC negative terminal in sequence is opposite to a bypass direction of a loop (Fig. 4 clockwise loop) formed by the first source terminal (Fig. 4 71), the first switch body (Fig. 4 65) and the first gate terminal (Fig. 4 72). Claim(s) 1, 3-4 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Miyazaki (US 2020/0035656). With respect to claim 1, Miyazaki discloses a power module capable of resisting driving interference, comprising at least one half-bridge power module (Fig. 8 2), wherein the at least one half-bridge power module comprises a first switch device (Fig. 9 Q1), a second switch device (Fig. 9 Q4), a DC positive terminal (Fig. 9 P) and a DC negative terminal (Fig. 9 N), the first switch device is electrically connected with the DC positive terminal, the second switch device is electrically connected with the DC negative terminal, the first switch device and the second switch device are connected in series to form a half-bridge arm (Fig. 9 Q1,Q2), and a middle point (Fig. 9 O) of the bridge arm is led out to be an SW terminal (Fig. 9 O), wherein the first switch device and the second switch device are arranged on a substrate (Fig. 8 8), wherein the second switch device comprises a second switch body (Fig. 8 Q4), a second source terminal (Fig. 8 SW4) and a second gate terminal (Fig. 8 GW4), wherein a bypass direction of a loop (Fig. 8 counterclockwise loop) formed by the DC positive terminal (Fig. 8 P), the first switch device (Fig. 8 Q1), the second switch device (Fig. 8 Q4) and the DC negative terminal (Fig. 8 N) in sequence is the same as the bypass direction of a loop (Fig. 8 counterclockwise loop) formed by the second source terminal (Fig. 8 SW4) , the second switch body (Fig. 8 Q4) and the second gate terminal (Fig. 8 GW4). With respect to claim 3, Miyazaki discloses the power module of claim 1, wherein the at least one half-bridge power module further comprises a filter capacitor (Fig. 8 CPN), wherein the filter capacitor (Fig. 9 CPN) and the half-bridge arm (Fig. 9 Q1,Q4) are connected in parallel. With respect to claim 4, Miyazaki discloses the power module of claim 3, wherein the filter capacitor, the second switch body and the first switch body are sequentially arranged on the substrate in sequence (Fig. 8 sequence as shown in Figure 8), the DC positive terminal and the DC negative terminal are arranged on one side (Fig. 8 side P,N), close to the filter capacitor (Fig. 8 CPN), of the substrate, and the SW terminal is arranged on another side (Fig. 8 side O), close to the first switch body (Fig. 8 Q1), of the substrate. With respect to claim 7, Miyazaki discloses the power module of claim 1, wherein a number of the at least one half-bridge power module is at least two (Fig. 20A LPC,Q2,Q5) , and the at least two half-bridge power modules are electrically connected through the DC positive terminal to form a full-bridge module (Fig. 20A Q1,Q2,Q4,Q5). With respect to claim 8, Miyazaki discloses the power module of claim 1, wherein a number of the at least one half-bridge power module is at least three (Fig. 34A Q1-Q4, Q2-Q5,Q3-Q6), and the at least three half-bridge power modules form a three-phase bridge module by electrically connecting the DC positive terminals (Fig. 34A PL). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu (US 2018/0152113) in view of Tracy (US 2005/0265059). With respect to claim 9, Xu discloses the power module of claim 1, with at least one half-bridge module and remains silent as to implementing at least 4 half-bridge modules. Tracy discloses a power module (Fig. 1 100) wherein a number of the at least one half-bridge power modules is at least four (Fig. 1 shows 4 half bridges), and the at least four half-bridge power modules are electrically connected to form a four-phase bridge module, two full-bridge modules or a three-phase bridge module-half-bridge module assembly structure (Fig. 4 using the 4 phase outputs 130). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement wherein a number of the at least one half-bridge power modules is at least four, and the at least four half-bridge power modules are electrically connected to form a four-phase bridge module, two full-bridge modules or a three-phase bridge module-half-bridge module assembly structure, in order to reduce the size and cost by reducing the number of modules. Claim(s) 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu (US 2018/0152113) in view of Mao (US 2023/0308027). With respect to claim 10, Xu discloses the power module of claim 1, and remains silent as to the type of substrate. It was well known before the time of filing of the claimed invention to implement wherein the substrate is a copper-clad ceramic substrate. Mao discloses a power module (Fig. 1 6) wherein the substrate is a copper-clad ceramic substrate (Fig. 1 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement wherein the substrate is a copper-clad ceramic substrate, in order to improve the thermal and electrical conductivity. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to claim 5, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, in combination with the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, primarily, wherein the filter capacitor and the first switch device are electrically connected by an electrical connector bypassing a left side of the second switch body, a first source terminal and a first gate terminal of the first switch device are arranged on at least one side of the first switch body, the second source terminal and the second gate terminal are arranged on a right side and a lower side of the second switch body, and positions of the first gate terminal and the second gate terminal are closer to positions of the first source terminal and the second source terminal. With respect to claim 6, the prior art does not disclose or suggest, in combination with the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, primarily, wherein the filter capacitor and the first switch device are electrically connected by an electrical connector bypassing a right side of the second switch body, the first source terminal and the first gate terminal are arranged on at least one side of the first switch body, the second source terminal and the second gate terminal are arranged on a left side and a lower side of the second switch body, and positions of the first gate terminal and the second gate terminal are closer to positions of the first source terminal and the second source terminal. The aforementioned limitations in combination with all remaining limitations of the respective claims are believed to render the aforementioned indicated claim and any dependent claims thereof patentable over the art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Xu (US 2018/0056795) discloses a half bridge. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY RAYMOND BEHM whose telephone number is (571)272-8929. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY R BEHM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601768
MONITORING ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM HAVING A MONITORING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587102
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH OPTIMIZED AVAILABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567814
Method and Device for Calibrating a Time Base Signal in a Photovoltaic Inverter
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567733
FAULT PROTECTION APPARATUS AND PHOTOVOLTAIC INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562564
REDUCING INRUSH CURRENT TO A CAPACITOR BANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1150 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month