Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/757,485

GAS TURBINE PEAKING POWER PLANT WITH CO2 CAPTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Examiner
MALATEK, KATHERYN A
Art Unit
3741
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mitsubishi Power Americas Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
310 granted / 360 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
391
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.6%
-5.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 360 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9, line 2 recites “2-pressrue” and should recite “2-pressure”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6, 9-10, 13 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Nagafuchi et al. (US 2022/0136416) in view of Nigro (US 2009/0301099). Regarding claim 1, Nagafuchi discloses a power production facility (Figure 1) comprising: a gas turbine engine (Figure 1, 1) configured to combust a fuel (paragraph 8) in a combustion process to produce exhaust gas (flows through L1) that can be used to produce rotational shaft power (paragraph 30) for generating electricity (via generator G); a steam system (2) configured to produce steam (paragraph 31, steam flows through L4)) from water (paragraph 38 describes the water flowing in L5) with heat from the exhaust gas (heat from exhaust gas in L1); and an emissions capture system (3) configured to: receive the exhaust gas (via valve V3) to remove pollutants (carbon dioxide recovery device 3 removes carbon dioxide); receive at least some of the steam (from L4) from the steam system to provide heat to the emissions capture system (paragraph 38); and provide at least some of the water to the steam system (via L5). Nagafuchi is silent on provide steam for injection into the combustion process; wherein the steam system comprises a low-pressure stage and a high-pressure stage; and wherein the steam for the emissions capture system is drawn from the low-pressure stage and the steam for the gas turbine engine is drawn from the high-pressure stage. Nigro teaches provide steam (Figure 1, line 63) for injection into the combustion process (5); wherein the steam system comprises a low-pressure stage (Annotated figure 1) and a high-pressure stage (Annotated figure 1); and wherein the steam for the emissions capture system (29) is drawn from the low-pressure stage (along line 65) and the steam for the gas turbine engine is drawn from the high-pressure stage (along line 63). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify Nagafuchi’s invention to include provide steam for injection into the combustion process; wherein the steam system comprises a low-pressure stage and a high-pressure stage; and wherein the steam for the emissions capture system is drawn from the low-pressure stage and the steam for the gas turbine engine is drawn from the high-pressure stage in order to minimize the amount of nitrous oxides in the flue gas and augment the power produced by the gas turbine as suggested and taught by Nigro in paragraph 54. Regarding claim 2, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nagafuchi further teaches wherein the emissions capture system comprises a CO2 capture unit that removes CO2 from the exhaust gas (paragraph 32). Regarding claim 3, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nagafuchi further teaches wherein the CO2 capture unit comprises a monoethanolamine gas treating unit (paragraph 32 describes the absorption tower 31 of the carbon dioxide recovery unit using monoethanolamine). Regarding claim 4, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nigro further teaches wherein the emissions capture system comprises a gas cooler (31) configured to receive the exhaust gas (in line 19), the gas cooler configured to condense the steam (intended use, the steam in 19 condenses when cooled sufficiently) within the exhaust gas (gas from 19). Regarding claim 6, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nagafuchi further teaches wherein the steam system further comprises a deaerator (Figure 2, 61) configured to receive the water (paragraph 40) from the steam system and emissions capture system (Figure 2 shows the steam L4 from the steam system goes through the emissions capture system 3 and exits to deaerator 61). Regarding claim 9, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nigro further teaches wherein the low-pressure stage and the high-pressure stage of the steam system comprise a 2-pressrue stage heat recovery steam generator (27). Regarding claim 10, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nigro further teaches wherein the steam system further comprises: a high-pressure steam line (63) connecting the steam system (27) to the gas turbine engine (7); and a first low-pressure steam line (65) connecting the steam system (27) to the emissions capture system (29). Regarding claim 13, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nagafuchi further teaches a pump (Figure 2, 62) to provide the water from the deaerator to the steam system (Figure 2 shows the pump 62 receives the water from condenser 61 and provides it to the steam system). Regarding claim 21, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nigro further teaches wherein the low-pressure stage and the high-pressure stage of the steam system comprise at least a portion of a heat recovery steam generator (27) having two or more stages (Figure 1 shows at least two stages). Claims 5 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Nagafuchi et al. (US 2022/0136416) in view of Nigro (US 2009/0301099), and further in view of Deng (US 2022/0397057). Regarding claim 5, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach all the essential features of the invention as claimed and described above except further comprising a water extraction line to send at least a portion of the water condensed by the gas cooler to an external consumer of the water, wherein the external consumer of water comprises an electrolyzer. Deng teaches further comprising a water extraction line (Figure 1, labeled H2O after flowing through 50) to send at least a portion of the water condensed by the gas cooler (50) to an external consumer of the water (16), wherein the external consumer of water comprises an electrolyzer (16 is an electrolyzer). Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify Nagafuchi in view of Nigro’s invention to include further comprising a water extraction line to send at least a portion of the water condensed by the gas cooler to an external consumer of the water, wherein the external consumer of water comprises an electrolyzer in order to reduce emissions while improving efficiency of the system as suggested and taught by Deng in paragraph 5. Regarding claim 11, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro teach the all the essential features of the invention as claimed and described above except a letdown line connecting the high-pressure steam line to the first low pressure steam line; and a pressure and temperature control element in the letdown line to reduce a pressure and temperature of the steam. Deng teaches a letdown line (Annotated figure 1, shown by arrows) connecting the high-pressure steam line to the first low pressure steam line (Figure 1 shows the letdown line connects the high pressure steam line in the HP section to the low pressure steam line in the IP section); and a pressure and temperature control element (Annotated figure 1 shows a valve) in the letdown line to reduce a pressure and temperature of the steam (intended use, a valve affects the pressure, and thus the temperature, of the flow through it). PNG media_image1.png 540 822 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify Nagafuchi in view of Nigro’s invention to include a letdown line connecting the high-pressure steam line to the first low pressure steam line; and a pressure and temperature control element in the letdown line to reduce a pressure and temperature of the steam in order to improve efficiency of the system. Regarding claim 12, Nagafuchi in view of Nigro and Deng teach the invention as claimed and described above. Nigro further teaches further comprising a second low-pressure steam line (Figure 1, dashed lines) connecting the first low-pressure steam line and the deaerator (Figure 1, labeled DEAERATOR) to provide low-pressure steam to the deaerator (Figure 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Katheryn Malatek whose telephone number is (571)272-5689. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday, 9 am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devon Kramer can be reached at (571) 272-7118. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERYN A MALATEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3741
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595759
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING POWER AND THERMAL MANAGEMENT HAVING DUAL LOOP ARCHITECTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584448
GAS TURBINE OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577907
INTER-TURBINE BURNER IN RECUPERATION CYCLE ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12553604
Swirling Flow-Blurring Atomizer
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12535037
GAS TURBINE ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+45.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 360 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month