Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/758,090

DYNAMIC UPLINK TRANSMISSION ADAPTATION

Final Rejection §103§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Priority
Dec 17, 2019 — provisional 62/949,412 +2 more
Examiner
YOUNG, STEVE R
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
401 granted / 595 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
64.5%
+24.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 595 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-7, 12, 14-17, 19-21, 23, 25-26, 28, 30-40 are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-7, 12, 14-17, 19-21, 23, 25-26, 28, 30, 33-34, 39 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over various claims (See below for mapping) of U.S. Patent No. 11,627,569 and 12,058,653. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the instant claims are a slightly broader version of the ‘569 and ‘653 claims where the differences are not patentably distinct: Instant Claim 1 ‘569 Claim 37 + 46 ‘653 Claim 1 + 9 An apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories, configured to cause the UE to: receive, via radio resource control (RRC) signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; receive, from the network entity, downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication; A user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory; and one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to: Receive, from a network entity, an indication of a temporary resource change, (Claim 46) Receiving a radio resource control message indicating one or more parameters of the temporary resource change An apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory; and one or more processors, coupled to the memory configured to cause the UE to: receive an indication of a resource change, Select, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, wherein the resource change is associated with one or more of: a repetition configuration, or a dynamic change; and wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration; and Wherein the temporary resource change is associated with at least a repetition configuration; and Wherein the resource change is associated with at least one of a resource configuration or a repetition configuration, (Claim 9) Wherein the resource change is associated with the repetition configuration transmit an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change. Transmit, to the network entity, an uplink transmission in accordance with the temporary resource change. …transmit an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change. RE Claim 2, See ‘569 Claim 39 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 3, See ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 4, See ‘569 Claim 38 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 5, See ‘569 Claim 38 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 6, See ‘569 Claim 38 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 7, See ‘569 Claim 38 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 12, See ‘569 Claim 39 & ‘653 Claim 10. RE Claim 14, See ‘569 Claim 44 & ‘653 Claim 12. RE Claim 15, See ‘569 Claim 46 & ‘653 Claim 13. RE Claim 16, See ‘569 Claim 47 & ‘653 Claim 14. RE Claim 17, See ‘569 Claim 12 & ‘653 Claim 15. RE Claim 19, See ‘569 Claim 14 & ‘653 Claim 1. RE Claim 20, See ‘569 Claim 13 & ‘653 Claim 15. RE Claim 21, See ‘569 Claim 13 & ‘653 Claim 15. RE Claim 23, See ‘569 Claim 1 & ‘653 Claim 21. RE Claim 25, See ‘569 Claim 3 & ‘653 Claim 21. RE Claim 26, See ‘569 Claim 2 & ‘653 Claim 21. RE Claim 28, See ‘569 Claim 1 & ‘653 Claim 26. RE Claim 30, See ‘569 Claim 3 & ‘653 Claim 26. RE Claim 33, See ‘569 Claim 41 & ‘653 Claim 11. RE Claim 34, See ‘569 Claim 42 & ‘653 Claim 11. RE Claim 39, See ‘569 Claim 39 & ‘653 Claim 10. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-4, 15-17, 19-20, 23, 25-26, 28, 30-38, 40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US# 2020/0052811 hereinafter referred to as Li) in view of Ying et al. (US# 2018/0279327 hereinafter referred to as Ying). RE Claim 1, Li discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) (See Li FIG 7C - UE), comprising: one or more memories (See Li [0027]-[0028], [0288], [0290] – storage medium); and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories (See Li [0027]-[0028], [0288], [0290] – processors), configured to cause the UE to: receive, from a network entity, downlink control information (DCI) that includes the indication of the resource change (See Li [0044], [0102]-[0109] – receiving indication from BS where indication of resource change is in DCI), wherein the resource change is associated with one or more of: a repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission), or a dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic change); wherein the resource change is associated with the repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission); and transmit an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change (See Li [0107]-[0109] – UE transmitting UL transmission with new resource changes). Li does not specifically disclose Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration. However, Ying teaches of Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - the preconfigured resource may be determined by RRC configuration; the gNB 160 may transmit multiple configurations (e.g., multiple periodicities and multiple SPS resources) by using the RRC signal); Receiving, from the network entity, downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - while the mini-slot index/offset may be determined by SPS activation or dynamically allocated by the DCI grant; the gNB … may indicate one configuration (e.g., one periodicity and one SPS resource) by using the DCI format); Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] – selecting the resource change (from the plurality of temporary resource changes) based in part on the indication), Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116] – i.e. For URLLC UL transmission schemes (including repetition)…for a UE 102 configured with K repetitions for URLLC UL transmission…). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, comprising Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration, as taught in Ying. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication flexibility and efficiency (See Ying Background; [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116]). RE Claim 2, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the resource change is for a threshold amount of time (See Li [0231] – changes can be temporary). RE Claim 3, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the resource change is for a threshold quantity of one or more symbols or slots (See Li [0044], [0057], [0064] – UL configuration for first number of slots (to account for interference [0044])). RE Claim 4, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the resource change is associated with the dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic resource changes). RE Claim 15, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive a radio resource control message that indicates one or more parameters of the resource change (See Li [0062] – UL resource change indication in RRC message). RE Claim 16, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: select, based at least in part on the indication, at least one of one or more parameters of the resource change (See Li [0044], [0057], [0064], [0102], [0107]-[0108] – UE applying (i.e. selecting) the different resource changes (i.e. one or more)). RE Claim 17, Li discloses a method for wireless communication performed at a user equipment (UE) (See Li FIG 7C - UE), comprising: receiving, from a network entity, downlink control information (DCI) that includes the indication of the resource change (See Li [0044], [0102]-[0109] – receiving indication from BS where indication of resource change is in DCI), wherein the resource change is associated with one or more of: a repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission), or a dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic change); wherein the resource change is associated with the repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission); and transmitting an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change (See Li [0107]-[0109] – UE transmitting UL transmission with new resource changes). Li does not specifically disclose Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration. However, Ying teaches of Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - the preconfigured resource may be determined by RRC configuration; the gNB 160 may transmit multiple configurations (e.g., multiple periodicities and multiple SPS resources) by using the RRC signal); Receiving, from the network entity, downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - while the mini-slot index/offset may be determined by SPS activation or dynamically allocated by the DCI grant; the gNB … may indicate one configuration (e.g., one periodicity and one SPS resource) by using the DCI format); Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] – selecting the resource change (from the plurality of temporary resource changes) based in part on the indication), Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116] – i.e. For URLLC UL transmission schemes (including repetition)…for a UE 102 configured with K repetitions for URLLC UL transmission…). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, comprising Receiving, via RRC signaling from a network entity, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration, as taught in Ying. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication flexibility and efficiency (See Ying Background; [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116]). RE Claim 19, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 17 above, wherein the resource change is for one of: a threshold amount of time (See Li [0231] – changes can be temporary), or a threshold quantity of one or more symbols or slots (See Li [0044], [0057], [0064] – UL configuration for first number of slots (to account for interference [0044])). RE Claim 20, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 17 above, wherein the resource change is associated with the dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic resource changes). RE Claim 23, Li discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a network entity (See Li FIG 7C - BS), comprising: one or more memories (See Li [0022], [0283], [0290] – storage medium); and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories (See Li [0022], [0283], [0290] – processors), configured to cause the network entity to: transmit, to a user equipment (UE), downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication that enables the UE to select a resource change (See Li [0044], [0102]-[0109] – receiving indication from BS where indication of resource change is in DCI), wherein the resource change is associated with one or more of: a repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission), or a dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic change); wherein the resource change is associated with the repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission); and receive, from the UE, an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change (See Li [0107]-[0109] – UE transmitting UL transmission with new resource changes). Li does not specifically disclose transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration. However, Ying teaches of transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - the preconfigured resource may be determined by RRC configuration; the gNB 160 may transmit multiple configurations (e.g., multiple periodicities and multiple SPS resources) by using the RRC signal); transmitting, to the UE, downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - while the mini-slot index/offset may be determined by SPS activation or dynamically allocated by the DCI grant; the gNB … may indicate one configuration (e.g., one periodicity and one SPS resource) by using the DCI format); Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] – selecting the resource change (from the plurality of temporary resource changes) based in part on the indication), Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116] – i.e. For URLLC UL transmission schemes (including repetition)…for a UE 102 configured with K repetitions for URLLC UL transmission…). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, comprising transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration, as taught in Ying. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication flexibility and efficiency (See Ying Background; [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116]). RE Claim 25, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 23 above, wherein the resource change is for one of: a threshold amount of time (See Li [0231] – changes can be temporary), or a threshold quantity of one or more symbols or slots (See Li [0044], [0057], [0064] – UL configuration for first number of slots (to account for interference [0044])). RE Claim 26, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 23 above, wherein the resource change is associated with the dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic resource changes). RE Claim 28, Li discloses a method for wireless communication performed at a network entity (See Li FIG 7C - BS), comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication that enables the UE to select a resource change (See Li [0044], [0102]-[0109] – receiving indication from BS where indication of resource change is in DCI), wherein the resource change is associated with one or more of: a repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission), or a dynamic change (See Li [0102] – dynamic change); wherein the resource change is associated with the repetition configuration (See Li [0064] – configuration for retransmission); and receiving, from the UE, an uplink transmission in accordance with the resource change (See Li [0107]-[0109] – UE transmitting UL transmission with new resource changes). Li does not specifically disclose transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration. However, Ying teaches of transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - the preconfigured resource may be determined by RRC configuration; the gNB 160 may transmit multiple configurations (e.g., multiple periodicities and multiple SPS resources) by using the RRC signal); transmitting, to the UE, downlink control information (DCI) that includes an indication (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] - while the mini-slot index/offset may be determined by SPS activation or dynamically allocated by the DCI grant; the gNB … may indicate one configuration (e.g., one periodicity and one SPS resource) by using the DCI format); Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089] – selecting the resource change (from the plurality of temporary resource changes) based in part on the indication), Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration (See Ying [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116] – i.e. For URLLC UL transmission schemes (including repetition)…for a UE 102 configured with K repetitions for URLLC UL transmission…). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, comprising transmitting, via RRC signaling to the UE, information that identifies a plurality of temporary resource changes; Selecting, based at least in part on the indication, a resource change from the plurality of temporary resource changes, Wherein the resource change selected from the plurality of temporary resource changes is associated with the repetition configuration, as taught in Ying. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication flexibility and efficiency (See Ying Background; [0028], [0057], [0065]-[0066], [0085], [0089], [0116]). RE Claim 30, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 28 above, wherein the resource change is for one of: a threshold amount of time (See Li [0231] – changes can be temporary), or a threshold quantity of one or more symbols or slots (See Li [0044], [0057], [0064] – UL configuration for first number of slots (to account for interference [0044])). RE Claim 31, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the repetition configuration indicates a quantity of repetitions of the uplink transmission to transmit (See Ying [0056] – The DCI carried by the PDCCH may include the number of PUSCH repetitions). RE Claim 32, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the indication includes an activation signal that indicates the UE is to use the resource change previously signaled to the UE (See Ying [0057], [0071], [0085], [0089], [0093] - In these cases, the DCI format may be the DCI format used for activating and/or deactivating UL transmission as mentioned above; the DCI (e.g., UL grant) may be used for the activation and/or the deactivation of the UL transmission (e.g., URLLC transmission) on the UL resource (e.g., the UL resource may be indicated by the DCI)). RE Claim 33, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the DCI is a UE-specific DCI (See Li [0177], [0187] – DCI change information can be UE-specific). RE Claim 34, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above, wherein the DCI is a group-common DCI (See Li [0177], [0187] – DCI change information can be common DCI). RE Claim 35, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 17 above, wherein the indication includes an activation signal that indicates the UE is to use the resource change previously signaled to the UE (See Ying [0057], [0071], [0085], [0089], [0093] - In these cases, the DCI format may be the DCI format used for activating and/or deactivating UL transmission as mentioned above; the DCI (e.g., UL grant) may be used for the activation and/or the deactivation of the UL transmission (e.g., URLLC transmission) on the UL resource (e.g., the UL resource may be indicated by the DCI)). RE Claim 36, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 17 above, wherein the repetition configuration indicates a quantity of repetitions of the uplink transmission to transmit (See Ying [0056] – The DCI carried by the PDCCH may include the number of PUSCH repetitions). RE Claim 37, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 23 above, wherein the indication includes an activation signal that indicates the UE is to use the resource change previously signaled to the UE (See Ying [0057], [0071], [0085], [0089], [0093] - In these cases, the DCI format may be the DCI format used for activating and/or deactivating UL transmission as mentioned above; the DCI (e.g., UL grant) may be used for the activation and/or the deactivation of the UL transmission (e.g., URLLC transmission) on the UL resource (e.g., the UL resource may be indicated by the DCI)). RE Claim 38, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 23 above, wherein the repetition configuration indicates a quantity of repetitions of the uplink transmission to transmit (See Ying [0056] – The DCI carried by the PDCCH may include the number of PUSCH repetitions). RE Claim 40, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 28 above, wherein the repetition configuration indicates a quantity of repetitions of the uplink transmission to transmit (See Ying [0056] – The DCI carried by the PDCCH may include the number of PUSCH repetitions). Claims 5 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US# 2020/0052811 hereinafter referred to as Li) in view of Ying et al. (US# 2018/0279327 hereinafter referred to as Ying) and Zhang et al. (US# 2015/0085716 hereinafter referred to as Zhang). RE Claim 5, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 4 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level. However, Zhang teaches of wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level (See Zhang [0083] – eNB adjusting UL signal power control parameter to change SINR). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level, as taught in Zhang. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication quality (See Zhang Technical Problem; Solution). RE Claim 21, Li, modified by Ying, discloses a method, as set forth in claim 20 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level. However, Zhang teaches of wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level (See Zhang [0083] – eNB adjusting UL signal power control parameter to change SINR). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the dynamic change is to a noise level, as taught in Zhang. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication quality (See Zhang Technical Problem; Solution). Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US# 2020/0052811 hereinafter referred to as Li) in view of Ying et al. (US# 2018/0279327 hereinafter referred to as Ying) and Liang et al. (US# 2017/0250740 hereinafter referred to as Liang). RE Claim 6, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 4 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the dynamic change is to a channel coefficient. However, Liang teaches of wherein the dynamic change is to a channel coefficient (See Liang [0008], [0050] - the BS modifies the estimated channel coefficients and computes the effective channel vector for each UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the dynamic change is to a channel coefficient, as taught in Liang. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication performance and efficiency (See Liang Background; Summary). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US# 2020/0052811 hereinafter referred to as Li) in view of Ying et al. (US# 2018/0279327 hereinafter referred to as Ying) and Guan et al. (US# 2021/0067233 hereinafter referred to as Guan). RE Claim 7, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 4 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the dynamic change is to a gain. However, Guan teaches of wherein the dynamic change is to a gain (See Guan [0074], [0082] – BS sends UE UL gain adjustment in order to hit target received power). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the dynamic change is to a gain, as taught in Guan. One is motivated as such in order to improve communication quality and reduce interference (See Guan Background; Summary). Claim 12, 14, 39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (US# 2020/0052811 hereinafter referred to as Li) in view of Ying et al. (US# 2018/0279327 hereinafter referred to as Ying) and Lu et al. (US# 2019/0019488 hereinafter referred to as Lu). RE Claim 12, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply. However, Lu teaches of wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply (See Lu [0016], [0029], [0044] – terminal sets timer to interference control duration parameter during which settings are changed to help mitigate interference; restores original settings when timer expires). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply, as taught in Lu. One is motivated as such in order to help control interference and improve performance (See Lu Background; Summary). RE Claim 14, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 1 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive a radio resource control message that includes information to identify a time for an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply. However, Lu teaches of wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive a radio resource control message that includes information to identify a time for an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply (See Lu [0016], [0029], [0044] – terminal sets timer to interference control duration parameter during which settings are changed to help mitigate interference; restores original settings when timer expires). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive a radio resource control message that includes information to identify a time for an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply, as taught in Lu. One is motivated as such in order to help control interference and improve performance (See Lu Background; Summary). RE Claim 39, Li, modified by Ying, discloses an apparatus, as set forth in claim 23 above. Li, modified by Ying, does not specifically disclose wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply. However, Lu teaches of wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply (See Lu [0016], [0029], [0044] – terminal sets timer to interference control duration parameter during which settings are changed to help mitigate interference; restores original settings when timer expires). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the wireless communication system, as disclosed in Li, modified by Ying, wherein the indication includes information that identifies an expiration of an occurrence of cross-link interference for which the resource change is to apply, as taught in Lu. One is motivated as such in order to help control interference and improve performance (See Lu Background; Summary). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Xu et al. (US# 2020/0112420 – which teaches of configuring CLI measurement/reporting resources). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §DOUBLEPATENT
Jun 30, 2026
Interview Requested
Jul 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 07, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772223
HARMONIC CHANNEL DETECTION AND PREVENTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12750176
METHOD FOR DETERMINING REFERENCE SIGNAL OR REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCE OR REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCE SET, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745244
FLEXIBLE UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION (UCI) TRANSMISSION WITH PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PUSCH)
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726974
CROSS-CARRIER DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, TERMINAL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12672128
COMMUNICATION OF ASYNCHRONOUS ULTRA-LOW LATENCY TRANSMISSIONS WITHIN A SYNCHRONIZED TRANSMISSION OPPORTUNITY (S-TXOP)
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+19.2%)
3y 3m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 595 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month