Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/758,654

IMAGE PROCESSING CIRCUIT AND DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — CN 202111627015.7 +1 more
Examiner
BHUIYAN, FAYEZ A
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
482 granted / 573 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
582
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 573 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgements Applicants’ arguments filed on 05/19/2026 are acknowledged. Applicant elects Species I. Accordingly, claims 1-6, 7, 13, 14 and 19 remain pending and have been examined. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. CN202111627015.7, filed on 12/28/2021. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/10/2025 was compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 7, 13, 14 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Corcoran (US 2018/0330526 A1) hereinafter Corcoran. Regarding Claim 1, Corcoran teaches an image processing circuit (fig.1B: CCU; central control unit), wherein the image processing circuit comprises: an image sensor (camera 18); a processor chip (fig.1B; CCU), wherein the processor chip is communicatively connected to the image sensor (fig.1B: CCU; central control unit and camera unit 18 are connected), and the processor chip comprises a first camera serial interface and a first bus interface (Para.0096; camera and processor with serial interface 54); and an image processing chip, wherein the image processing chip comprises a second camera serial interface and a second bus interface (Para.0096; camera and processor with serial interface 54), the second camera serial interface is connected to the first camera serial interface (Para.0096; camera and processor with serial interface 54), and the second bus interface is connected to the first bus interface, wherein the image processing chip and the processor chip transmit image data through the second camera serial interface and the first camera serial interface (Para.0096; multiple camera 18 and processor 30 with serial interface 54 transmit image data), and transmit control instructions through the second bus interface and the first bus interface (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor with serial interface 54 transmit instruction using multi bus). Regarding Claim 2, Corcoran teaches the image processing circuit according to claim 1, wherein the processor chip further comprises a first display serial interface, the image processing chip comprises a second display serial interface (Para.0078; vision system 8), and the second display serial interface is connected to the first display serial interface (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; Para.0078; vision system 8; camera and processor is connected to display). Regarding Claim 3, Corcoran teaches the image processing circuit according to claim 2, wherein the processor chip further comprises an image signal processing module and a display synthesis service module, one end of the display synthesis service module is communicatively connected to the image sensor through the image signal processing module, and the other end of the display synthesis service module is connected to the first display serial interface (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; Para.0078; vision system 8; camera and processor is connected to display). Regarding Claim 4, Corcoran teaches the image processing circuit according to claim 1, wherein the processor chip further comprises a first storage module, and the first camera serial interface is communicatively connected to the first storage module (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor with storage 24M). Regarding Claim 5, Corcoran teaches the electronic device, comprising the image processing circuit according to claim 1 (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor). Regarding Claim 6, Corcoran teaches same reason as Claim 1. Regarding Claim 7, Corcoran teaches the method according to claim 6, wherein after the sending the second image data to the processor chip through the second camera serial interface, the method further comprises: receiving, through the second bus interface, a stream-off instruction sent by the processor chip; and in response to the stream-off instruction, stopping sending the second image data to the processor chip (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor with serial interface 54 transmit instruction using multi bus). Regarding Claim 13, Corcoran teaches an electronic device, comprising a processor and a memory (Para.0037; memory 24M), wherein the memory stores a program or instructions capable of running on the processor, wherein the program or the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electronic device to perform the steps of the data transmission method according to claim 6 (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor with serial interface 54 transmit instruction using multi bus). Regarding Claim 14, Corcoran teaches the electronic device according to claim 13, wherein after sending the second image data to the processor chip through the second camera serial interface, the program or the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electronic device to further perform: receiving, through the second bus interface, a stream-off instruction sent by the processor chip (Para.0039, 0096 and 0106); and in response to the stream-off instruction, stopping sending the second image data to the processor chip (fig.1B-1E; Para.0039, 0096 and 0106; camera and processor with serial interface 54 transmit instruction using multi bus). Regarding Claim 19, Corcoran teaches a non-transitory readable storage medium, wherein the non-transitory readable storage medium stores a program or instructions, and when the program or the instructions are executed by a processor, the steps of the data transmission method according to claim 6 are implemented (fig.1B-1E; Para.0012; 0039, 0096 and 0106). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAYEZ A BHUIYAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1562. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00 - 6:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached on 571-272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAYEZ BHUIYAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2639 /LIN YE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771936
METHOD OF DETECTING AND ACCOUNTING FOR TRUE MOTION OF IMAGERY SUBJECT TO ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12769190
IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS AND CAMERA SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765096
IMAGING APPARATUS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR IMAGING APPARATUS
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750607
IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739521
IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 573 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month