Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/758,823

CALCULATING AND UTILIZING POWER METRICS FOR CONNECTED NETWORK DEVICES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Examiner
YEN, PAUL JUEI-FU
Art Unit
2175
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Juniper Networks Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
311 granted / 407 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 407 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is sent in response to Applicant’s Communication received 06/28/24 for application number 18/758,823. The Office hereby acknowledges receipt of the following and placed of record in file: Specification, Drawings, Abstract, Oath/Declaration, IDS, Claims, and Certified Copy of Foreign Priority Application. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Step 1: Claims 1-7 recite a method, Claims 8-14 recite a network device, and Claims 15-20 recite a non-transitory computer readable medium. Therefore, Claims 1-7 are directed to a process, Claims 8-14 are directed to a machine, and Claims 15-20 are directed to a manufacture. With respect to Claims 1, 8, and 15: Step 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception: Determining…a bandwidth utilization and a power consumption by a network device; (mental process – evaluation or judgement) Determining…weights for the power consumption, the carbon emission value, and the electricity cost; (mental process – evaluation or judgement) Calculating…a unit power metric based on the bandwidth utilization, the power consumption, the carbon emission value, the electricity cost, and the weights. (mental process – evaluation or judgement) (claim 8) apply the weights to the power consumption, the carbon emission value, and the electricity cost to generate a weighted power consumption, a weighted carbon emission value, and a weighted electricity cost (mental process – mathematical calculation) Step 2A Prong 2: the judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application (claim 1) receiving, by the network device, a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; performing, by the network device, one or more actions based on the unit power metric (claim 8) receive a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; perform one or more actions based on the unit power metric (claim 15) receive a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; perform one or more actions based on the unit power metric (insignificant extra-solution activity – mere data gathering – MPEP 2106.05(g) Step 2B: The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception receiving, by the network device, a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; performing, by the network device, one or more actions based on the unit power metric (claim 8) receive a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; perform one or more actions based on the unit power metric (claim 15) receive a carbon emission value and an electricity cost associated with the network device; perform one or more actions based on the unit power metric (insignificant extra-solution activity – mere data gathering – MPEP 2106.05(g); WURC: receiving or transmitting data over a network -MPEP 2106.05(d)(ll)(i) With respect to Claims 2 and 9: 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception calculating a per link power metric based on the bandwidth utilization, the power consumption, the carbon emission value, the electricity cost, and the weights; (mental process – mathematical calculation) 2A Prong 2: the judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application performing one or more additional actions based on the per link power metric (mere instructions to apply an exception - MPEP 2106.05(f)) 2B: the claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception (claim 2) performing one or more additional actions based on the per link power metric (mere instructions to apply an exception - MPEP 2106.05(f)) (claim 9) performing one or more additional actions based on the per link power metric (mere instructions to apply an exception - MPEP 2106.05(f)) With respect to Claims 3, 6, 10, 12, 17, and 20 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception storing the per link power metric in a data structure; (mental process - evaluation, or mathematical calculations) or utilizing the per link power metric to calculate one or more paths for traffic forwarding by the network device(mental process - evaluation, or mathematical calculations) With respect to Claim 4, 7, 11, 13, and 18 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception determining, after expiration of a predetermined time period, an updated bandwidth utilization and an updated power consumption by the network device; (mental process – evaluation or judgement) and recalculating the per link power metric based on the updated bandwidth utilization, the updated power consumption, the carbon emission value, the electricity cost, and the weights (mental process - evaluation, or mathematical calculations) With respect to Claim 5, 14, and 19 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception calculating a per component power metric based on the bandwidth utilization, the power consumption, the carbon emission value, the electricity cost, and the weights; (mental process - evaluation, or mathematical calculations) Step 2A Prong 2: the judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application performing one or more additional actions based on the per component power metric (mere instructions to apply an exception - MPEP 2106.05(f)) Step 2B: The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception performing one or more additional actions based on the per component power metric (mere instructions to apply an exception - MPEP 2106.05(f)) With respect to Claim 16 2A Prong 1: the claim recites a judicial exception wherein the power metric includes one or more of a unit power metric, a per link power metric, a per component power metric, or a per device power metric (mathematical concept – mathematical relationships) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable once the outstanding rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 is overcome. Conclusion Applicant is reminded that in amending a response to a rejection of claims, the patentable novelty must be clearly shown in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited and the objections made. Applicant must also show how the amendments avoid such references and objections. See 37 CFR §1.111(c). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL J YEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5047. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kim Huynh can be reached at (571) 272-4147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Paul Yen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2175
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596489
MEMORY SYSTEM AND POWER SUPPLY CONTROL CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596425
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING CENTRAL-PROCESSING UNITS IN SLEEP MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596416
POWER OVER ETHERNET CARD WITH EXPANDED POWER FOR POWER SOURCING EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596418
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND POWER SUPPLY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591265
APPARATUS FOR TIMESTAMP PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 407 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month