Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/759,038

RETRACTABLE COVER FOR IMMERSION COOLING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Examiner
MCKINNON, TERRELL L
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Liquidstack Holding B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
26%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
44%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 26% of cases
26%
Career Allow Rate
19 granted / 72 resolved
-25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 72 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Shah et al (US 2023/0080447). Reg. Cl. 1, Shah et al., discloses: A retractable cover sheet assembly for an immersion cooling system, the assembly comprising: a case (710) having side walls defining an opening (811); and a first retractable cover sheet (1010) located above the opening of the case, the first retractable cover sheet being movable from a first position to a second position to provide a sized opening smaller than the opening of the case ([0048]). Reg. Cl. 2, Shah et al., discloses: A condenser (719, 741) mounted to an interior surface of the case, the condenser configured to condense dielectric vapor at or near the sized opening, wherein the condenser is recessed from the sized opening to avoid interfering with objects being raised or lowered through the sized opening. Reg. Cl. 3, Shah et al., discloses: wherein the first retractable cover sheet is configured to mount within an interior volume of an immersion tank (Fig. 10 also [0048], [0049]). Reg. Cl. 4, Shah et al., discloses: wherein the first retractable cover sheet comprises a flexible material and is configured to spool around a rotatable cylinder when in a retracted position ([0049]). Reg. Cl. 5, Shah et al., discloses: wherein the retractable cover sheet assembly is configured to mount to an interior surface of an immersion tank. Reg. Cl. 6, Shah et al., discloses: wherein the first retractable cover sheet is configured to be stored along an interior wall of an immersion tank when in a retracted position. Reg. Cl. 7, Shah et al., discloses: further comprising a second retractable cover sheet that is coplanar with the first retractable cover sheet ([0048]). Reg. Cl. 8, Shah et al., discloses: further comprising a motorized assembly that moves the first retractable cover sheet to adjust a dimension of the sized opening ([0050]). Reg. Cl. 9, Shah et al., discloses: further comprising a motorized assembly comprising: a linear guide system (1020) attached to the case; and an electric motor coupled to the linear guide system, wherein the linear guide system is driven by the electric motor to displace both the first retractable cover sheet and the condenser ([0048, 0050]). Reg. Cl. 10, Shah et al., discloses: wherein the first retractable cover sheet is substantially impermeable to dielectric vapor ([0048, 0049]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shah et al (US 2023/0080447). Reg. Cl. 11, Shah et al discloses: A retractable cover sheet assembly for an immersion cooling system, the assembly comprising: an adjustable case having an opening (811); a condenser (719, 741) attached to an interior surface of the adjustable case; a retractable cover sheet (1010) having a first edge and a second edge, the first edge being attached to a rotatable cylinder and the second edge being attached to a top edge of the adjustable case; and a motorized assembly ([0050]) configured to displace the second edge of the retractable cover sheet to adjust a dimension of the opening. Shah discloses the need to replace or repair components associated with the immersion cooling system. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one before the effective filing date of the invention for Shah et al motorized assembly ([0050]) to be configured to displace both the condenser and the second edge of the retractable cover sheet to adjust a dimension of the opening. Doing so would allow the controller to automatically actuate the one or more roller coverings in the proper manner prior to the lid being opened for any reason, for example, maintenance, server failure, server change, etc, as disclosed by Shah et al. Claims 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Radtke et al in view of Shah et al (US 2023/0080447). Reg. Cl. 16, Radtke discloses: A retractable cover sheet assembly that can be used for an immersion cooling system, the assembly comprising: a spring-loaded cylinder assembly comprising: a first mounting bracket (59); a second mounting bracket; a fixed shaft having a first end fixedly attached to the first mounting bracket; a rotary shaft having a first end rotatably attached to the second mounting bracket, a second end of the rotary shaft being rotatably coupled to a second end of the fixed shaft; a torsion spring (abstract, 46 and 48) positioned around the fixed shaft, a first end of the torsion spring being attached to the first mounting bracket or the fixed shaft, a second end of the torsion spring being attached to the rotary shaft; and a cylinder positioned around the rotary shaft, the fixed shaft, and the torsion spring, the cylinder serving as a spring-loaded cylinder; and a cover sheet having a first edge attached to the cylinder, wherein the cover sheet is spooled around the cylinder when the torsion spring is in a relaxed state, and wherein unspooling the cover sheet from the cylinder serves to store energy in the torsion spring. Reg. Cl. 17, Radtke fails to discloses, however Shah et al teaches: a case having side walls defining an opening; and a condenser mounted to an interior surface of the case, the condenser configured to condense dielectric vapor at or near the opening, wherein a second edge of the cover sheet is attached to the case, wherein moving the case in a first direction causes the cover sheet to unspool from the cylinder and moving the case in a second direction opposite the first direction causes the cover sheet to spool around the cylinder. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Radtke invention to be used with Shah et al immersion cooling system. Doing so would provide a retractable coversheet for protecting heat generated devices with an immersion cooling system. Reg. Cl. 18, Radtke discloses the cover sheet connected to the cylinder. Wherein it would have been obvious to one at the effective filing date of the invention to have a press plate, wherein the first edge of the cover sheet is attached to the cylinder by the press plate. Doing so would provide an alternate means of attaching the cover sheet to the cylinder. Reg. Cl. 19, Radtke as modified by Shah et al discloses: a bushing located between the fixed shaft and the rotary shaft and a bearing located between the rotary shaft and the second mounting bracket. Reg. Cl. 20, Radtke as modified by Shah et al. discloses: wherein a position of the edge of the cover sheet is determined by a computer-controlled motorized assembly (Shah et al [0050] and Radtke (172)). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see the prior art listed on the PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRELL L MCKINNON whose telephone number is (571)272-4797. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8:00 am to 4:30 pm.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell L McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRELL L MCKINNON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12570022
HYBRID SAWHORSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569871
MOUNTING SYSTEM FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH PAINTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12459434
ACTUATOR, REAR VIEW DEVICE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Patent 12435918
INSTALLATION FOOT AND REFRIGERATOR HAVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 12422062
HINGE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
26%
Grant Probability
44%
With Interview (+18.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 72 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month