Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/759,601

MILL CALIBRATION WITH SINGLE SCAN

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Examiner
KASENGE, CHARLES R
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1110 granted / 1321 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1347
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
41.3%
+1.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1321 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gerth U.S. PGPub 2023/0064331 (hereinafter “Gerth”). Regarding claims 1, 8 and 14, Gerth discloses a computer-implemented method of automated milling machine calibration (e.g. Fig. 1-6 and 12), comprising: receiving a 3D virtual calibration design (e.g. templates) comprising one or more designed indented regions (e.g. indentations on the top surface of dental bridge teeth) and a designed curved region (e.g. curved surface of the sides of the bridge teeth) (e.g. ¶93-94 and 124); milling the 3D virtual calibration design into a physical block to provide a 3D physical milled calibration block (e.g. ¶126, 175 and 191); receiving a 3D virtual calibration scan block (e.g. digital scan model) of the 3D physical milled calibration block (e.g. ¶127-128); and determining one or more calibration parameters (e.g. compensating deviations) from the 3D virtual calibration scan block (e.g. ¶132-135). Regarding claims 2, 9 and 15, Gerth discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a calibration alert from a milling machine, wherein the milling is performed by the calibration alert generating milling machine (e.g. ¶132-135). Regarding claims 3, 10 and 16, Gerth discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising updating milling production instructions with the one or more calibration parameters (e.g. ¶132-135). Regarding claims 4 and 17, Gerth discloses the method of claim 3, wherein the milling production instructions are updated automatically (e.g. ¶132-135). Regarding claims 5, 11 and 18, Gerth discloses the method of claim 1, wherein milling the 3D virtual calibration design into the physical block comprises milling a first section of a first surface region (e.g. top of the 1st tooth in bridge) and a second section of the first surface region (e.g. top of the 2nd tooth in bridge) into the physical block (e.g. ¶93-94, 126, 175 and 191). Regarding claims 6, 12 and 19, Gerth discloses the method of claim 5, wherein milling the 3D virtual calibration design comprises milling a curved region (e.g. sides of the bridge teeth) into the physical block to provide a milled curved region between the first section and the second section (e.g. ¶93-94, 126, 175 and 191). Regarding claims 7, 13 and 20, Gerth discloses the method of claim 5, wherein milling the 3D virtual calibration design comprises milling one or more designed indented regions into the first section and the second section to provide one or more milled indented regions (e.g. ¶93-94, 126, 175 and 191). Relevant Prior Art Bohm DE-102015121180-A1 discloses a computer-implemented method of automated milling machine calibration, comprising: receiving a 3D virtual calibration design comprising one or more designed indented regions and a designed curved region; milling the 3D virtual calibration design into a physical block to provide a 3D physical milled calibration block; receiving a 3D virtual calibration scan block of the 3D physical milled calibration block; and determining one or more calibration parameters from the 3D virtual calibration scan block (e.g. pg. 1-10). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES R KASENGE whose telephone number is (571)272-3743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CK June 2, 2026 /CHARLES R KASENGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750989
ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE TEMPERATURE OF DRIVE SYSTEM COMPONENTS OF SUCH AN ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12730423
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING AN OPERATION BASED ON SENSOR SIGNAL DATA
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730420
SOFTWARE ROBOT ORCHESTRATION ENGINE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727116
ZONED HEAT DISSIPATION CONTROL SYSTEM FOR WATER COOLING RADIATOR AND WATER COOLING HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM HAVING THE ZONED HEAT DISSIPATION CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715730
ELEVATOR AND ESCALATOR CONTROL NETWORK MANAGEMENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1321 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month