Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/760,909

METHOD AND APPARATUS TO PROCESS AND BOND LAYERS IN AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103§112§DP
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Priority
Jan 13, 2023 — continuation of 12/059,838
Examiner
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD
Art Unit
1754
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sakuu Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
630 granted / 939 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
987
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
76.7%
+36.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 939 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-10 in page 2, 3rd paragraph, the reply filed on 03/24/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group of the invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: Claim 1 recites “an energy source to cure the non-cured layer and bond the non-cured layer” which include a structural placeholder of “an energy source” plus functional limitation of “to cure the non-cured layer and bond the non-cured layer”. Specification defines “light forms, such as infra-red, or ultraviolet light, or ultrasound” as a corresponding structure for claimed “energy source”. Clarification is required. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-5, 9, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites “on a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media opposite a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media” which renders the claim vague and indefinite because it is not clear how “a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media” can be opposite of “a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media”. Does the claim in fact mean “on a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media opposite another side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media”? Clarification is requested. Claim 9 recites “a uniform pressure to an uppermost one of the cured layers in the stack” wherein the term “uniform” is a relative term and renders the claim vague and indefinite. The term “uniform” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “the amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media in 1st line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because prior to the cited limitation neither claims 1 and 10 define “an amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media”. Clarification is requested. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “a build platform drive mechanism configured to drive the build platform to increase the pressure or decrease the pressure based on the pressure measurement received by the control device” (see lines 6-8) that invokes 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. However, the written description fails to disclose the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the entire claimed function and to clearly link the structure, material, or acts to the function. Therefore, the claim is indefinite and is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Applicant may: (a) Amend the claim so that the claim limitation will no longer be interpreted as a limitation under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph; (b) Amend the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites what structure, material, or acts perform the entire claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (c) Amend the written description of the specification such that it clearly links the structure, material, or acts disclosed therein to the function recited in the claim, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)). If applicant is of the opinion that the written description of the specification already implicitly or inherently discloses the corresponding structure, material, or acts and clearly links them to the function so that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize what structure, material, or acts perform the claimed function, applicant should clarify the record by either: (a) Amending the written description of the specification such that it expressly recites the corresponding structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function and clearly links or associates the structure, material, or acts to the claimed function, without introducing any new matter (35 U.S.C. 132(a)); or (b) Stating on the record what the corresponding structure, material, or acts, which are implicitly or inherently set forth in the written description of the specification, perform the claimed function. For more information, see 37 CFR 1.75(d) and MPEP §§ 608.01(o) and 2181. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or non-obviousness. Claim(s) 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hull et al. (US 2008/0169586) in view of Rogen et al. (US 2021/0379820). Hull et al. (US 2008/0169586) disclose a method for bonding a non-cured layer to a cured layer, comprising: - mounting the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) on a first side of a substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]); - positioning the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) on the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) with the cured layer (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0066]); - bringing the cured layer (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0065]) and the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) into contact (see Figs 1B – 1C); [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (A flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (36))][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Energy source 22)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Substrate 42)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Non-cured layer 39)][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Cured layer 26)] PNG media_image1.png 442 645 media_image1.png Greyscale - applying energy through the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) to the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) from an energy source (¶ [0065]: a radiation source 22 provides focused solid imaging radiation 24 that is projected onto the build material-wetted surface 26 of a build 28 to cure selected portions of the fresh build material layer 39 in an image plane) to cure the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) and bond the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) to the cured layer (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0065]) to form a bonded cured multilayer stack; - positioning a flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) on a second side of the substrate to apply pressure to the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) while the energy is being applied, the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media having a contact portion (see Figs. 1A – 1C); and - creating relative movement between the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) and the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) to move the contact portion along the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) to exert pressure on the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) on the first side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]), wherein the contact portion is transparent (¶ [0067]: the image plane supporting plate will be made of transparent glass or suitably transmissive plastics) to the energy. However, Hull et al. (US ‘586) is silent on disclosing the transparent contact portion also comprises a window portion to allow passage of energy through a contact portion of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media, as claimed in claim 1. In the analogous art, Rogen et al. (US 2021/0379820) disclose a jetted material printer comprising a receiver device (204) to include a support frame (502) which provides mechanical support to permeable membrane (302). Support frame (502) exhibit a continuous sheet like structure which may be provided with apertures in which permeable membrane (302) may be installed. Further, support frame (502) is a discrete window frame like structure which surround permeable. Support frame (502) is a discrete window frame like structure which surround permeable membrane (302). Support frame (502) may be a separate structure or it may be affixed to permeable membrane (302). See ¶ [0043]. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (A window portion (502))] PNG media_image2.png 243 530 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, as to claim 1, Rogen et al. (US ‘820) disclose a three-dimensional (3D) inkjet printer comprises a contact portion between the surround permeable membrane (302) and the receiver device (204) includes window portion (502, ¶ [0043]). As to claim 8, Rogen et al. (US ‘820) disclose the energy source (¶ [0054]: the radiant energy can be IR radiation, UV radiation, electron beam, or other known radiation types) is configured to increase intensity of the energy applied through the window portion (502, ¶ [0043]) in the contact portion to increase from a first light level at a leading edge of the window portion (502, ¶ [0043]) to a second light level at a trailing edge of the window portion (502, ¶ [0043]) as the window portion (502, ¶ [0043]) is moved over the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the time of applicant’s invention, to modify the contact portion that is formed on the flexible compliant pressure media, as suggested by Hull et al. (US ‘586), so to form a window portion in order to preserve the fine resolution of inkjet technology, thus, improving speed of printing, as suggested by Rogen et al. (US ‘820): ¶ [0006]. As to claim 2, Hull et al. (US ‘586) discloses the contact portion is located between first and second leg portions (drive shafts 43, ¶ [0067]) on opposite sides of the contact portion, wherein the first and second legs (drive shafts 43, ¶ [0067]) of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) are held out of contact with the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]), and wherein the first and second legs (drive shafts 43, ¶ [0067]) of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) are opaque to the energy. As to claim 3, Hull et al. (US ‘586) teach separating the bonded cured multilayer stack from the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]). See ¶ [0065] and ¶ [0068]. As to claim 4, Hull et al. (US ‘586) disclose the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) further comprises a pressure chamber located on a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) opposite a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) that contacts the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]). As to claim 5, Hull et al. (US ‘586) teach the pressure chamber is inflatable to exert pressure on the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37). As to claim 6, Hull et al. (US ‘586) disclose the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) is comprised of a conforming layer mounted on a rigid plate, the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) being located between the rigid plate and the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]). As to claim 7, Hull et al. (US ‘586) teach the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) and the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) are flexible, and wherein the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]) and the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) are held out of contact with the cured layer (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0066]) until the contact portion presses the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) onto the cured layer (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0065]) as the contact portion is positioned along the second side of the substrate (an image plane supporting plane 42, ¶ [0067]). As to claim 9, Hull et al. (US ‘586) disclose a plurality of cured layers are mounted to form a stack of cured layers (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0065]), and an amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) is controlled to apply a uniform pressure to an uppermost one of the cured layers (the build surface 26 of a build 28, ¶ [0065]) in the stack regardless of how many of the cured layers are in the stack. As to claim 10, Hull et al. (US ‘586) teach the amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37) is controlled by a feedback system comprised of a pressure sensor configured to provide a pressure measurement of the pressure applied to the non-cured layer (the fresh and uncured build material layer 39, ¶ [0066] - ¶ [0067]) by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (¶ [0066]: a build material transport surface 36 for conveying the build material layer-by-layer from a source thereof, reservoir 37), a control device (¶ [0150] - ¶ [0151]: a controller may be provided to control the exposure at the seams and for segmenting the projected image by the imager that produced the image segment) coupled to receive the pressure measurement from the pressure sensor, and a build platform drive mechanism configured to drive the build platform to increase the pressure or decrease the pressure based on the pressure measurement received by the control device (¶ [0150] - ¶ [0151]: a controller may be provided to control the exposure at the seams and for segmenting the projected image by the imager that produced the image segment). Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-10 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-18 and 19-26 of U.S. Patent No. 12,059,838. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. For instance, the claimed method for bonding a non-cured layer to a cured layer, as claimed in claim 1 of the instant application, is not identical to claimed method for bonding a non-cured layer to a cured layer, as claimed in claims 1 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. ‘838. However, they are not patentably distinct from each other as set forth below: As to claim 1 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose a method for bonding a non-cured layer (105) to a cured layer (110), comprising: - mounting the non-cured layer (105) on a first side of a substrate (120) (see claims 1 and 19: 3rd line); - positioning the non-cured layer (105) on the substrate (120) with the cured layer (110) (see claims 1 and 19: 3rd line); - bringing the cured layer (110) and the non-cured layer (105) into contact (see claims 1 and 19: 7th line); - applying energy through the substrate (120) to the non-cured layer (105) from an energy source to cure the non-cured layer (105) and bond the non-cured layer (105) to the cured layer (110) to form a bonded cured multilayer stack (see claims 1 and 19: lines 9-14); - positioning a flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (405) on a second side of the substrate (120) to apply pressure to the non-cured layer (105) while the energy is being applied, the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (405) having a contact portion (see claims 1 and 19: lines 20-32); and - creating relative movement between the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media (405) and the second side of the substrate (120) to move the contact portion along the second side of the substrate (120) to exert pressure on the non-cured layer (105) on the first side of the substrate (120), wherein the contact portion includes a window portion that is transparent to the energy (see claims 1 and 19: lines 33-43). As to claim 2 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose the contact portion is located between first and second leg portions on opposite sides of the contact portion, wherein the first and second legs of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media are held out of contact with the second side of the substrate, and wherein the first and second legs of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media are opaque to the energy. (see claims 1 and 19: lines 22-26) As to claim 3 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose separating the bonded cured multilayer stack from the substrate. (see claim 2) As to claim 4 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) teach the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media further comprises a pressure chamber located on a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media opposite a side of the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media that contacts the second side of the substrate. (see claim 10) As to claim 5 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose the pressure chamber is inflatable to exert pressure on the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media. (see claim 11) As to claim 6 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) teach the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media is comprised of a conforming layer mounted on a rigid plate, the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media being located between the rigid plate and the second side of the substrate. (see claim 12) As to claim 7 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose the substrate and the non-cured layer are flexible, and wherein the substrate and the non-cured layer are held out of contact with the cured layer until the contact portion presses the non-cured layer onto the cured layer as the contact portion is positioned along the second side of the substrate. (see claim 13) As to claim 8 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) teach the energy source is configured to increase intensity of the energy applied through the window portion in the contact portion to increase from a first light level at a leading edge of the window portion to a second light level at a trailing edge of the window portion as the window portion is moved over the second side of the substrate. (see claim 14) As to claim 9 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) disclose a plurality of cured layers are mounted to form a stack of cured layers, and an amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media is controlled to apply a uniform pressure to an uppermost one of the cured layers in the stack regardless of how many of the cured layers are in the stack. (see claim 16) As to claim 10 of the instant application, Vatani et al. (US ‘838) teach the amount of pressure applied by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media is controlled by a feedback system comprised of a pressure sensor configured to provide a pressure measurement of the pressure applied to the non-cured layer by the flexible compliant pressure conveyance media, a control device coupled to receive the pressure measurement from the pressure sensor, and a build platform drive mechanism configured to drive the build platform to increase the pressure or decrease the pressure based on the pressure measurement received by the control device. (see claim 17) Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Thompson et al. (US 2021/0046695) disclose a method of operating an additive manufacturing apparatus that includes a stage, a support structure, a foil that extends between the stage and the support structure and that defines a build surface, and a foil separation device. (see claim 27) Comb et al. (US 2020/0338825) disclose a selective deposition-based additive manufacturing system for printing a three-dimensional part, the additive manufacturing system comprising: an electro-statographic imaging engine configured to develop an imaged layer of a thermoplastic-based powder; a movable build platform; a transfer medium configured to receive the imaged layer from the imaging engine, and to convey the received imaged layer; a first heater configured to heat the imaged layer; and a transfusion element configured to transfer the heated imaged layer conveyed by the transfer medium onto the movable build platform by pressing the heated imaged layer between the transfer medium and the moveable build platform, the transfusion element comprising a compliant nip roller configured to deform when in contact with previously transferred layers of the part. (see claim 1) Rogren (US 2020/0298477) disclose a method of manufacturing a three-dimensional object comprising: repeatedly forming patterned single-layer objects according to a predetermined sequence and predetermined patterns; and assembling the sequence of the patterned single-layer objects into the three-dimensional object on an assembly plate; wherein forming each of the patterned single-layer objects comprises: dispensing fluidized particles onto a carrier substrate to form a material layer; compacting the material layer to a predetermined compaction range; printing a binder material on the material layer according to a predetermined pattern; selectively fusing the material layer according to the predetermined pattern; removing non-fused portions of the material layer to form one of the patterned single-layer objects; and transferring the one of the patterned single-layer objects from the carrier substrate to the assembly plate. Thresh et al. (US 10,086,558) disclose a three-dimensional (3-D) printing system comprising: an intermediate transfer belt (ITB); development stations positioned to electrostatically transfer build and support materials to said ITB; a transfer station adjacent said ITB; guides adjacent said transfer station; and platens moving on said guides, said guides are shaped to direct said platens to repeatedly pass said transfer station and come in contact with said ITB at said transfer station, said ITB transfers a layer of said build and support materials to said platens each time said platens contact said ITB at said transfer station to successively form layers of said build and support materials on said platens, said platens include first alignment projections, said ITB includes second alignment projections, said first alignment projections temporarily join with said second alignment projections at said transfer station, as said platens pass said transfer station, to align said platens with said ITB as said platens contact said ITB, and said platens include a height adjustment that moves a surface said platen away from said ITB as a stack of said layers on said platens becomes larger. Teicher et al. (US 2014/0265032) disclose a method for preparing three-dimensional layer of a three-dimensional printing of the object comprising receiving two-dimensional image data of a cross section of the three-dimensional object, the image including a body region and a support region, wherein the support region is distinct from the body region; selectively depositing, on a transparent substrate, a layer that includes at least a first liquid photopolymer body material which covers and encloses the body region, and a liquid support material that is different from the first liquid photopolymer body material and which covers and encloses the support region; and selectively solidifying the first liquid photopolymer body material by irradiating the layer with curing radiation through the transparent substrate according to the body region, such that some of the liquid body material remains uncured. Chillscyzn et al. (US 2013/0075013) disclose an additive manufacturing system for printing a three-dimensional part, the additive manufacturing system comprising: a rotatable multiple-layer belt configured to receive imaged layers of a thermoplastic-based powder from an imaging engine;a drive mechanism configured to rotate the multiple-layer belt at a rotational rate to transfer the received imaged layers;a build platform configured to receive the imaged layers from the multiple-layer belt in a layer-by-layer manner to print the three-dimensional part on the build platform; anda gantry configured to move the build platform in a reciprocating rectangular pattern that is synchronized with the rotational rate of the multiple-layer belt. Correspondence Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH whose telephone number is (571)272-6215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SUSAN D. LEONG can be reached at (571)270-1487. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1754 06/09/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679024
DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRINTING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS
5y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679034
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ARTICLE BY ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
5y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677838
FOOD PROCESSING DEVICE, COMPONENTRY, AND RELATED METHODS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667110
Porous Mould Drum For Poultry, Pork, Meat-Replacement and Vegetarian Food
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654386
Pouch Curl Prevention Apparatus
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 939 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month