Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/760,993

LAUNDRY APPLIANCE DOOR ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SUCH ASSEMBLIES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Examiner
CHAUDHRI, OMAIR
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Haier US Appliance Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
184 granted / 281 resolved
+0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
333
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 281 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-10, in the reply filed on 02/26/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious search burden. This is not found persuasive because the inventions require a different field of search and have acquired a separate status in the art in view of their different classification. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 11-20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 02/26/2026. Claim Interpretation Applicant utilizes the phrase “heat stake welding” in the application, such a phrase is understood to refer to the well-known process heat-staking. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bhandare (US20190145041A1) As to claim 1, Bhandare discloses a door of a laundry treating appliance (abstract), the door comprising: an inner frame (Fig.3 ref 130), a window (ref 132) in the inner frame [0053], a shield (combination of refs 104 & 102) outboard of the window, and an outer frame (ref 106) surrounding the shield, the door assembly configurated to be rotatably mounted to a cabinet of the laundry appliance (see Figs.1-2), wherein a cap is formed via coupling of the outer frame and the shield together via heat stake welding [0050-0052]. Thus, Bhandare teaches the method of heat stake welding the shield and outer frame to one another in order to form a cap. As to claims 2-8, Bhandare teaches the method of claim 1, wherein a cylindrical boss is passed through a passage to form the cap via heat stake welding (see Figs.10 & 12A-12B & [0050-0052]). Further, a distal end of the cylindrical boss is heated and a forming tool (Figs.12A-12B ref 154) is applied to said distal end in order to form the cylindrical boss into the cap (see Figs.12-A-12B). The heating of the distal end of the cylindrical boss includes heating of the forming tool [0052] and application of the heated forming tool to the distal end of the boss heats said distal end. A proximal portion of the boss remains cylindrical after forming of the cap on the distal end of the boss (see Fig.12B). The proximal portion of the boss defines an outer diameter, the passage defines an inner diameter, and the cap defines a major dimension at a shoulder of the boss (see Figs.12A-12B). The shoulder of the boss abuts a distal end of the passage (see Figs.12A-12B). The major dimension of the cap is greater than the inner diameter of the passage (see Figs.12A-12B). As to claims 9-10, Bhandare teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the shield and outer frame are comprised of a plastic material [0036-0037]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Buso (US20200063328A1) showcases a door construction having an inner frame, window, shield, and outer frame without the presence of multiple parts comprising an intermediate frame (see Figs.9-10). Li (US20200270794A1; see Fig.3), Kim (US20150000200A1; see Figs.3-4), Hill (US20090320371A1; see Fig.2), and Park (US20240229339A1; see Fig.2) all disclose similar Schuck (US20110023560A1) showcases a door having an inner frame (Figs.2A-2B ref 400A), a window (Figs.2A-2B ref 700A), a shield (Figs.2A-2B ref 300), and an outer frame surrounding the shield (Figs.2A-2B ref 200). Da Riol (US20120086315A1) showcases a protective cover (ref 150) for a door window (ref 220) disposed in, and surrounded by, an outer frame (ref 210). Mithal (US20160198875A1) discloses heat staking is a well-known means for attaching an element to a door [0062]. NPL1 and NPL2 both showcases that heat staking is a known process for joining of two elements (see attached NPL1 & NPL2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAIR CHAUDHRI whose telephone number is (571)272-4773. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:00am to 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at (571)272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMAIR CHAUDHRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12606127
Lens Cleaning System
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12601102
CLOTHING PROCESSING DEVICE INCLUDING HEAT DISSIPATION SHEET
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594910
APPARATUS FOR CLEANING A SENSOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593954
DISHWASHER
2y 3m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594583
SUBSTRATE CLEANING DEVICE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND MAINTENANCE METHOD FOR SUBSTRATE CLEANING DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.1%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 281 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month