Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/762,489

ROBOT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 02, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0127144 +2 more
Examiner
HURLEY, KEVIN
Art Unit
3611
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
985 granted / 1144 resolved
+34.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1152
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§102
47.8%
+7.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1144 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of the restriction requirement in the reply filed on 2 September 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Groups I and III are not mutually exclusive and include similar structure. This is not found persuasive because as noted in the requirement, each group includes mutually exclusive limitations and there is two-way distinctness between them. Furthermore searching through thousands of references, and the subsequent patentability determination of four patentably distinct inventions does indeed present a serious burden on the examiner. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticpated by Watanabe et al JP 2005-28971. Watanabe et al. disclose a robot comprising: a rear joint motor 16,17 and a front joint motor 14,15installed to be spaced apart from each other at a lower portion of a body 1; a rear joint 8,9 configured to be rotated by the rear joint motor; a rear drive motor 12,13 disposed at a lower portion of the rear joint; a rear wheel 4,5 configured to be rotated by the rear drive motor; a front joint 6,7 configured to be rotated by the front joint motor; a front drive motor 10,11 disposed at a lower portion of the front joint; a front wheel 2,3 configured to be rotated by the front drive motor; and a processor 80 configured to control the rear joint motor, the front joint motor, the rear drive motor and front drive motor, wherein the rear joint motor and the front joint motor are configured to respectively rotate the rear joint and the front joint to change a wheel distance between the rear wheel and the front wheel in a front and rear direction according to a driving mode (as shown in Figs. 4A and 4B); wherein the wheel distance is set to a first distance for an indoor driving mode (Fig. 4A “normal driving 1”), wherein the wheel distance is set to a second distance for a terrain driving mode (Fig. 4B “normal driving 2”), and wherein the wheel distance is set to a third distance for an outdoor flat driving mode (Fig. 7c “step 6”), wherein the second distance is greater than the first distance, and wherein the third distance is greater than the second distance; wherein a height of a lower body of the body is positioned at a first height above a ground in the indoor driving mode, wherein the height of the lower body is positioned at a second height above the ground in the terrain driving mode, and wherein the second height is lower than the first height; wherein the height of the lower body is positioned at a third height above the ground in the outdoor flat driving mode, and wherein the third height is lower than the second height. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kevin Hurley whose telephone number is (571)272-6646. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9 am-5:30 pm Kevin.Hurley@USPTO.GOV. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Valentin Neacsu can be reached at 571-272-6265. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN HURLEY/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3611 September 18, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 02, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747000
COOLING AND HEATING SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC SNOWMOBILE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734851
Trailer Hitch and Trailer Hitch System
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735853
ICE SCRATCHER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735138
DYNAMICALLY BALANCED IN-LINE WHEEL VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728919
GROUND MILLING MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD MILLING MACHINE, STABILIZER OR RECYCLER, METHOD FOR MOVING A GROUND MILLING MACHINE IN A DIRECTION UP TO 90° TRANSVERSE TO A LONGITUDINAL MACHINE DIRECTION AND METHOD FOR POSITIONING A GROUND MILLING MACHINE FOR MAINTENANCE WORKS AND/OR FOR TRANSPORT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1144 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month