Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/762,828

TILE CLIP FOR WALL PANEL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Examiner
DEMUREN, BABAJIDE A
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Krueger International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
761 granted / 1032 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1052
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1032 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-7 in the reply filed on 02/09/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/03/2024 was considered by the examiner. Claim objection: Claim 1, line 6, “from outer end” should be “from the/said outer end” because an outer end was introduced at line 5. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wendt US4255910. Claim 1. Wendt discloses a tile clip (16) for use in retaining a tile on a support frame of a wall panel, the tile clip comprising: a base (20) extending between a first end (denoted 30 below) and a second end (denoted 32 below) and having first and second sides (denoted 33 and 35 below); an end wall (19) integrally formed with the base and extending from the second end (32 below) of the base to an outer end; an engagement tip (17) extending from outer end of the end wall; an attachment arm (23) extending from the base in a direction opposite the end wall (as illustrated in extract of Fig.4 below), wherein the attachment arm is configured to engage the support frame of the wall panel to securely hold the tile clip on the support frame. PNG media_image1.png 433 385 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2. Wendt discloses the end wall extends perpendicular from the base and the engagement tip (17) extends from the end wall (19) toward the first end (30) of the base (as illustrated in extract of Fig.4 above). Claim 5. Wendt discloses the attachment arm (23) includes a body that extends between a first end (denoted 36 above) and a second end (denoted 34 above), wherein the first end is attached to the base and the second end is spaced from the base (as illustrated in extract of Fig.4 above). Claim 6. Wendt discloses attachment of the body to the base is flexible to allow a spacing between the second end and the base to change (such that flange of 33 can be accommodated as shown in Fig.5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 4, and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wendt US4255910 as applied to claim 1 above. Claim 3-4. Wendt fails to disclose the tile clip is formed from a clear plastic material, however it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the instant invention to form the tile clip from a clear plastic material with the motivation of providing relatively cheaper yet equally rigid clips as those made from metal with it being clear for aesthetic feature since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. Claim 7. Wendt discloses the base includes a central opening (24) aligned with the attachment arm (23) but is silent that the attachment arm extends into the central opening when the tile clip is not installed on the support frame of the wall panel. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the instant invention to form the attachment arm such that it extends into the central opening to provide a spring like effect such that when installed the arm is pressed firmly against the flange of the stud (33, Fig.1). Furthermore, it has been held that a person with ordinary skill has good reason to pursue known options within his or her technical grasp. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to attached NOTICE OF REFERENCE CITED. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BABAJIDE A DEMUREN whose telephone number is (571)270-7017. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 5712726754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BABAJIDE A. DEMUREN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3633 /BABAJIDE A DEMUREN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601184
ARCHITECTURAL SIDING AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12571212
TRUSS ELEMENT, LADDER ELEMENT, COUPLING ELEMENT AND TRUSS SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565772
PRIVACY SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559952
DEVICE FOR LEVELING AND ALIGNING TILES AND METHOD FOR LEVELING AND ALIGNING TILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562673
SUPPORT ASSEMBLY FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES AND MOUNTING SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1032 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month